• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

一般认知能力与心理不应期:思维瓶颈的个体差异。

General cognitive ability and the psychological refractory period: individual differences in the mind's bottleneck.

机构信息

Harvard University, MA, USA.

出版信息

Psychol Sci. 2013 Jul 1;24(7):1226-33. doi: 10.1177/0956797612471540. Epub 2013 Jun 6.

DOI:10.1177/0956797612471540
PMID:23744874
Abstract

Identifying the precise locus of general cognitive ability (g) in the flow of information between perception and action is an important goal of differential psychology. To localize the negative correlation between g and reaction time to a specific processing stage, we administered a speeded number-comparison task to two groups differing in average g. The participants had to respond to two stimuli in each trial, which produced the well-known slowing of the second reaction time known as the psychological refractory period. The difference in the second reaction time favoring the high-g group doubled as the stimulus onsets became very close together. This finding affirms that the faster reaction times of higher-g individuals reflect an advantage exclusively in the serial bottleneck of central processing and not in the parallel peripheral stages.

摘要

确定一般认知能力(g)在感知和动作之间信息流中的精确位置是差异心理学的一个重要目标。为了将 g 与反应时之间的负相关定位到特定的加工阶段,我们对两组平均 g 值不同的个体进行了速度化的数字比较任务。参与者在每次试验中都必须对两个刺激做出反应,这会导致众所周知的第二个反应时变慢,即心理不应期。当刺激起始非常接近时,高 g 值组的第二个反应时的差异增加了一倍。这一发现证实,高 g 值个体的更快反应时间反映了他们在中央处理的串行瓶颈中具有优势,而不是在并行的外围阶段。

相似文献

1
General cognitive ability and the psychological refractory period: individual differences in the mind's bottleneck.一般认知能力与心理不应期:思维瓶颈的个体差异。
Psychol Sci. 2013 Jul 1;24(7):1226-33. doi: 10.1177/0956797612471540. Epub 2013 Jun 6.
2
Probing the cortical network underlying the psychological refractory period: a combined EEG-fMRI study.探究心理不应期的皮质网络:一项 EEG-fMRI 联合研究。
Neuroimage. 2011 Jun 1;56(3):1608-21. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2011.03.017. Epub 2011 Mar 21.
3
The source of execution-related dual-task interference: motor bottleneck or response monitoring?与执行相关的双重任务干扰源:运动瓶颈还是反应监测?
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 2009 Oct;35(5):1413-26. doi: 10.1037/a0015874.
4
Action-effect codes in and before the central bottleneck: evidence from the psychological refractory period paradigm.中枢瓶颈期及之前的动作-效应编码:来自心理不应期范式的证据
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 2007 Jun;33(3):627-44. doi: 10.1037/0096-1523.33.3.627.
5
Queuing network modeling of the psychological refractory period (PRP).心理不应期(PRP)的排队网络建模
Psychol Rev. 2008 Oct;115(4):913-54. doi: 10.1037/a0013123.
6
On the optimality of serial and parallel processing in the psychological refractory period paradigm: effects of the distribution of stimulus onset asynchronies.心理不应期范式中串行与并行加工的最优性:刺激起始异步分布的影响
Cogn Psychol. 2009 May;58(3):273-310. doi: 10.1016/j.cogpsych.2006.08.003. Epub 2009 Mar 17.
7
Stress improves task processing efficiency in dual-tasks.压力提高双任务中的任务处理效率。
Behav Brain Res. 2013 Sep 1;252:260-5. doi: 10.1016/j.bbr.2013.06.013. Epub 2013 Jun 13.
8
Dual-task performance with ideomotor-compatible tasks: is the central processing bottleneck intact, bypassed, or shifted in locus?与观念运动兼容任务的双任务表现:中枢处理瓶颈是保持不变、被绕过还是在位置上发生了转移?
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 2005 Feb;31(1):122-44. doi: 10.1037/0096-1523.31.1.122.
9
Determinants of central processing order in psychological refractory period paradigms: central arrival times, detection times, or preparation?心理不应期范式中中枢加工顺序的决定因素:中枢到达时间、检测时间还是准备状态?
Q J Exp Psychol (Hove). 2011 Oct;64(10):2012-43. doi: 10.1080/17470218.2011.573567. Epub 2011 Jun 15.
10
Viewer perspective affects central bottleneck requirements in spatial translation tasks.观察者视角会影响空间平移任务中的中央瓶颈要求。
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 2008 Apr;34(2):398-412. doi: 10.1037/0096-1523.34.2.398.

引用本文的文献

1
Comparing the performance of a large language model and naive human interviewers in interviewing children about a witnessed mock-event.比较大型语言模型与天真的人类面试官在就一起目睹的模拟事件询问儿童时的表现。
PLoS One. 2025 Feb 28;20(2):e0316317. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0316317. eCollection 2025.
2
The working memory costs of a central attentional bottleneck in multitasking.多任务处理中心注意瓶颈的工作记忆成本。
Psychol Res. 2022 Sep;86(6):1774-1791. doi: 10.1007/s00426-021-01615-1. Epub 2021 Nov 9.
3
Two separate, large cohorts reveal potential modifiers of age-associated variation in visual reaction time performance.
两项独立的大型队列研究揭示了视觉反应时间表现中与年龄相关变异的潜在调节因素。
NPJ Aging Mech Dis. 2021 Jul 1;7(1):14. doi: 10.1038/s41514-021-00067-6.