The Institute of Translational Hepatology, Beijing 302 Hospital, Peking University, Beijing 100039, China.
World J Gastroenterol. 2013 Jun 7;19(21):3199-206. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v19.i21.3199.
Combination therapy with peginterferon (pegIFN)-α and ribavirin (RBV) has been the standard of care (SOC) for chronic hepatitis C. Unfortunately, not all patients can achieve a sustained virologic response (SVR) with this regimen. SVR rates are approximately 80% in patients with hepatitis C virus (HCV) genotype 2, 3, 5 and 6 and 40%-50% in patients with genotype 1 and 4. Therefore, strategies to improve SVR rates have been an important issue for clinical physicians. Several direct acting antiviral agents (DAAs) have significantly higher SVR rates when combined with pegIFN-α and RBV than pegIFN-α and RBV alone. Treatments containing DAAs have several advantages over the previous SOC, including higher specificity and efficacy, shorter treatment durations, fewer side effects, and oral administration. Based on these advantages, treatment with pegIFN-α and RBV plus telaprevir or boceprevir has become the current SOC for patients with genotype 1 HCV infection. However, many patients are either not eligible for therapy or decline treatment due to coexisting relative or absolute contraindications as well as an inability to tolerate the hematological side effects and adverse events caused by the new SOC. These factors have contributed to the advent of pegIFN-α-free regimens. The newest therapeutic regimens containing sofosbuvir and ABT-450 have shown promising results. In this review, we summarize the development of anti-HCV agents and the clinical efficacy of sofosbuvir and ABT-450-based therapies as well as the potential for future HCV studies.
聚乙二醇干扰素(pegIFN)-α与利巴韦林(RBV)联合治疗一直是慢性丙型肝炎的标准治疗方案(SOC)。遗憾的是,并非所有患者都能通过该方案实现持续病毒学应答(SVR)。HCV 基因型 2、3、5 和 6 的患者 SVR 率约为 80%,基因型 1 和 4 的患者 SVR 率约为 40%-50%。因此,提高 SVR 率的策略一直是临床医生关注的重要问题。与 pegIFN-α和 RBV 单独治疗相比,几种直接作用抗病毒药物(DAA)与 pegIFN-α和 RBV 联合治疗的 SVR 率显著提高。与之前的 SOC 相比,含 DAA 的治疗方案具有几个优势,包括更高的特异性和疗效、更短的治疗时间、更少的副作用和口服给药。基于这些优势,对于基因型 1 HCV 感染的患者,pegIFN-α和 RBV 联合特拉普韦或博赛匹韦治疗已成为当前的 SOC。然而,由于共存的相对或绝对禁忌症以及不能耐受新 SOC 引起的血液学副作用和不良事件,许多患者要么不适合治疗,要么拒绝治疗。这些因素促成了无 pegIFN-α方案的出现。基于索非布韦和 ABT-450 的最新治疗方案显示出了令人鼓舞的结果。在这篇综述中,我们总结了抗 HCV 药物的发展以及基于索非布韦和 ABT-450 的治疗方案的临床疗效,以及未来 HCV 研究的潜力。