Suppr超能文献

子宫内膜癌:与之前的国际妇产科联盟(FIGO)分期系统相比,新分期系统下的临床特征和生存率

Endometrial carcinoma: clinical characteristic and survival rates by the new compared to the prior FIGO staging systems.

作者信息

Tangjitgamol Siriwan, Srijaipracharoen Sunamchok, Manusirivithaya Sumonmal, Khunnarong Jakkapan, Pataradool Kamol, Thavaramara Thaovalai

机构信息

Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Faculty of Medicine, Vajira Hospital, University of Bangkok Metropolis, Bangkok, Thailand.

出版信息

J Med Assoc Thai. 2013 May;96(5):505-12.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To compare clinical characteristic features and survival rates of endometrial cancer (EMC) patients according to the new 2009 and prior 1988 FIGO staging systems.

MATERIAL AND METHOD

Clinico-pathological data of EMC patients who had primary surgical treatment between 1992 and 2008 were collected. The new FIGO staging was compared to the prior assigned staging. Survivals of patients according to prior and new staging were compared

RESULTS

Data from 259 patients was reviewed. Mean age was 55.4 +/- 9.9 years. Radiation was the most common adjuvant therapy after surgery, 95/106 patients (89.6%). Progression and recurrences occurred in 34 patients (16 with progression and 18 with recurrence) while 47 died (18.1%). Comparing the prior and current staging, early stage I-II was commonly found in both systems. Stages were the same in 81 patients (31.3%), lower in 177 (68.3%), and higher in one (0.4%). After a median follow-up of 57.5 months, 5-year progression-free, cancer-specific and overall survivals according to the prior and new systems were similar in stage III-IV. Survivals of new stage IA (from 16-prior stage IA, 124-IB, 12-IIA, and 1-IIIA) and stage IB (from 32-IC and 8-IIA) were worse than those of prior stage IA or IB. Survivals of the new stage II patients (11-IIB) were the same as prior stage IIB.

CONCLUSION

The "new" FIGO staging system for endometrial cancer patients resulted in lower stage in a large number of patients. Survival trends were worse in the new stage I and remained similar in the other stages.

摘要

目的

根据2009年新版和1988年以前的国际妇产科联盟(FIGO)分期系统,比较子宫内膜癌(EMC)患者的临床特征和生存率。

材料与方法

收集1992年至2008年间接受初次手术治疗的EMC患者的临床病理数据。将新版FIGO分期与先前指定的分期进行比较。比较患者根据先前分期和新分期的生存率。

结果

回顾了259例患者的数据。平均年龄为55.4±9.9岁。放疗是手术后最常见的辅助治疗,106例患者中有95例(89.6%)接受放疗。34例患者出现进展和复发(16例进展,18例复发),47例死亡(18.1%)。比较先前分期和当前分期,早期I-II期在两个系统中都很常见。81例患者(31.3%)分期相同,177例(68.3%)分期降低,1例(0.4%)分期升高。中位随访57.5个月后,III-IV期患者根据先前和新系统的5年无进展生存率、癌症特异性生存率和总生存率相似。新版IA期(先前IA期16例、IB期124例、IIA期12例和IIIA期1例)和IB期(先前IC期32例和IIA期8例)患者的生存率低于先前IA期或IB期。新版II期患者(IIB期11例)的生存率与先前IIB期相同。

结论

子宫内膜癌患者的“新”FIGO分期系统使大量患者分期降低。新版I期患者的生存趋势较差,其他期患者的生存趋势相似。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验