Centre for Veterinary Epidemiology and Risk Analysis, UCD School of Veterinary Medicine, University College Dublin, Belfield, Dublin 4, Ireland.
Prev Vet Med. 2013 Sep 1;111(3-4):237-44. doi: 10.1016/j.prevetmed.2013.05.004. Epub 2013 Jun 6.
During the last several decades in Ireland, there has been substantial scientific progress in our understanding and related policy changes in the bovine tuberculosis (bTB) eradication programme. A range of performance measurements are routinely available, each highlighting a steadily improving situation in Ireland. However, recent research has highlighted an on-going problem of residual infection, contributing to recurrent breakdowns. In light of this general improvement, but also cognisant of residual infection, a critical evaluation of changes in effectiveness of managing recurrence is particularly valuable. Therefore, the objective of the study was to compare the herd-level risk of recurrence of bTB in Ireland between 1998 and 2008. A retrospective cohort study was carried out, using a Cox proportional-hazards model, to compare the risk of restriction recurrence in herds derestricted during 1998 and 2008. These herds were observed for up to 3 years from the end of the 'index restriction'. At the univariable level, 46.4% and 34.8% of study herds derestricted in 1998 and 2008, respectively, had a subsequent breakdown during the study period (χ(2)=70.6, P<0.001). In the multivariable analysis, there has been a significant reduction in bTB recurrence in Ireland, with 2008-derestricted herds being 0.74 times (95% confidence interval: 0.68-0.81) as likely to be restricted during the subsequent study period compared with 1998-derestricted herds. In the final Cox model, the rate of a future breakdown increased with increasing herd size, increasing number of standard reactors in the index restriction, increasing percentage of newly restricted herds within the District Electoral Division (DED) and if the herd had a previous bTB episode in the previous 5 years. The risk varied across herd type. The results from the current study provide further reassurance of an improved national situation, both in terms of limiting the establishment of new infection (bTB incidence) and in effectively clearing infection once detected (recurrence following derestriction). Recurrence of bTB requires effective implementation of multiple control strategies, focusing on identifying and removing residually infected cattle, and limiting environmental sources of infection, which in Ireland primarily relates to badgers.
在过去的几十年里,爱尔兰在理解牛结核病(bTB)根除计划方面取得了重大的科学进展,并相应地调整了相关政策。目前,有一系列常规的性能测量指标,每一个都强调了爱尔兰情况的稳步改善。然而,最近的研究凸显了持续存在的感染残余问题,这导致了反复的疫情爆发。鉴于这种普遍的改善,但也考虑到残余感染问题,对管理复发效果变化的批判性评估尤其有价值。因此,本研究的目的是比较 1998 年至 2008 年爱尔兰牛结核病复发的 herd-level 风险。进行了一项回顾性队列研究,使用 Cox 比例风险模型比较了 1998 年和 2008 年放宽限制的 herd 中 bTB 复发的风险。这些 herd 在“索引限制”结束后最多观察 3 年。在单变量水平上,分别有 46.4%和 34.8%的研究 herd 在 1998 年和 2008 年放宽限制后,在研究期间再次爆发疫情(χ(2)=70.6,P<0.001)。在多变量分析中,爱尔兰的 bTB 复发率显著降低,与 1998 年放宽限制的 herd 相比,2008 年放宽限制的 herd 在随后的研究期间再次被限制的可能性降低了 0.74 倍(95%置信区间:0.68-0.81)。在最终的 Cox 模型中,随着 herd 规模的增加、索引限制中标准反应牛的数量增加、在地区选举分区(DED)内新被限制 herd 的百分比增加以及 herd 在过去 5 年内是否有过 bTB 爆发,未来爆发的风险也随之增加。风险因 herd 类型而异。本研究的结果进一步证明了全国形势的改善,无论是在限制新感染的建立(bTB 发病率)方面,还是在一旦发现感染时有效清除感染(放宽限制后的复发)方面。bTB 的复发需要有效实施多种控制策略,重点是识别和清除残留感染的牛,并限制感染的环境来源,在爱尔兰这主要与獾有关。