Department of Animal Science, The Pennsylvania State University, University Park, Pennsylvania 16802, USA.
J Dairy Sci. 2013 Aug;96(8):5295-9. doi: 10.3168/jds.2012-6442. Epub 2013 Jun 5.
The objective of this experiment was to evaluate acid-insoluble ash (AIA) and indigestible NDF (iNDF) as intrinsic digestibility markers in comparison with total fecal collection (TC) in dairy cows fed corn silage- and alfalfa haylage-based diets. The experiment was part of a larger experiment, which involved 8 Holstein cows [102±28.4 d in milk, 26.4±0.27 kg/d of dry matter (DM) intake, and 43±5.3 kg/d milk yield]. The experimental design was a replicated 4×4 Latin square with the following treatments: metabolizable protein (MP)-adequate diet [15.6% crude protein (CP); high-CP], MP-deficient diet (14.0% CP; low-CP), and 2 other low-CP diets supplemented (top-dressed) with ruminally protected Lys or Lys and Met. Data for the 3 low-CP diets were combined for this analysis. Total feces were collected for 5 consecutive days during each period to estimate total-tract apparent digestibility. Digestibility was also estimated using AIA (digestion with 2 N HCl) and iNDF (12-d ruminal incubation in 25-μm-pore-size bags). Significant diet × digestibility method interactions were observed for fecal output of nutrients and digestibility. Fecal output of nutrients estimated using AIA or iNDF was lower compared with TC and fecal output of DM, organic matter, and CP tended to be higher for iNDF compared with AIA for the high-CP diet. For the low-CP diet, however, fecal output of all nutrients was lower for AIA compared with TC and was higher for iNDF compared with TC. Data from this experiment showed that, compared with TC, AIA underestimated fecal output and overestimated digestibility, particularly evident with the fiber fractions and the protein-deficient diet. Compared with TC, fecal output was overestimated and digestibility of the low-CP diet was underestimated when iNDF was used as a marker, although the magnitude of the difference was smaller compared with that for AIA. In the conditions of the current study, iNDF appeared to be a more reliable digestibility marker than AIA in terms of detecting dietary differences in apparent digestibility of some nutrients, but significant diet × marker interactions existed that need to be considered when estimating total-tract digestibility using intrinsic markers.
本实验旨在评估酸不溶灰分(AIA)和不可消化中性洗涤纤维(iNDF)作为奶牛采食玉米青贮和苜蓿干草青贮日粮时的内源性消化率标记物,与全粪收集(TC)相比的结果。该实验是更大规模实验的一部分,涉及 8 头荷斯坦奶牛[产奶天数 102±28.4d,干物质(DM)采食量 26.4±0.27kg/d,产奶量 43±5.3kg/d]。实验设计为复制的 4×4 拉丁方设计,处理如下:可代谢蛋白(MP)充足日粮[15.6%粗蛋白(CP);高蛋白]、MP 缺乏日粮(14.0%CP;低蛋白)和 2 种添加(表面添加)瘤胃保护性赖氨酸或赖氨酸和蛋氨酸的低蛋白日粮。本分析合并了 3 种低蛋白日粮的数据。每个时期连续收集 5 天的全粪,以估计全肠道表观消化率。还使用 AIA(2N HCl 消化)和 iNDF(12d 25μm 孔径袋瘤胃孵育)估计消化率。养分和消化率的粪便排泄量存在显著的日粮×消化率方法相互作用。与 TC 相比,使用 AIA 或 iNDF 估计的粪便排泄量较低,与高蛋白日粮相比,iNDF 估计的 DM、有机物和 CP 的粪便排泄量趋于较高,而对于低蛋白日粮,与 TC 相比,所有养分的 AIA 粪便排泄量均较低,而 iNDF 则较高。本实验数据表明,与 TC 相比,AIA 低估了粪便排泄量,高估了消化率,尤其是在纤维部分和蛋白质缺乏日粮中。与 TC 相比,当使用 iNDF 作为标记物时,低蛋白日粮的粪便排泄量被高估,消化率被低估,尽管与 AIA 相比,差异幅度较小。在本研究条件下,与 AIA 相比,iNDF 似乎是一种更可靠的消化率标记物,能够检测到某些养分表观消化率的日粮差异,但存在显著的日粮×标记物相互作用,在使用内源性标记物估计全肠道消化率时需要考虑这些相互作用。