Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
J Arthroplasty. 2013 Dec;28(10):1878-81. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2013.05.007. Epub 2013 Jun 6.
We compared perforation rates among operative staff who were randomly assigned either thick latex surgical gloves or conventional gloves for use in performing total knee arthroplasty. A total of 1120 gloves were assessed in 70 total knee arthroplasties. Additionally, the degree of tactile sensitivity provided by the gloves was compared using a two-point discrimination (TPD) test. Perforation occurred in 27 surgeries (38.5%) and in 48 gloves (4.29%). Binary logistic regression analysis revealed that the operator was a risk factor for perforation rate (Odds ratio 14.448, P < .0.01) and that the type of glove was not (P = .896). In the TPD test, tactile sensitivity was lower for a thick outer glove than the conventional double glove (P < .001 for each site). Not only did thick surgical gloves lower tactile sensitivity, they also offered no superior protective effect over conventional gloves.
我们比较了在全膝关节置换术中随机分配使用厚乳胶手术手套或常规手套的手术人员的穿孔率。在 70 例全膝关节置换术中评估了总共 1120 只手套。此外,使用两点辨别测试(TPD)比较了手套提供的触觉灵敏度。27 例手术(38.5%)和 48 只手套(4.29%)发生穿孔。二元逻辑回归分析显示,手术人员是穿孔率的危险因素(优势比 14.448,P <.01),而手套类型不是(P =.896)。在 TPD 测试中,厚外手套的触觉灵敏度低于常规双层手套(每个部位 P <.001)。厚手术手套不仅降低了触觉灵敏度,而且与常规手套相比,没有提供更好的保护效果。