Marinovic Welber, Arnold Derek H
Perception Laboratory, School of Psychology, The University of Queensland, Australia.
Vision Res. 2013 Aug 9;88:47-54. doi: 10.1016/j.visres.2013.05.009. Epub 2013 Jun 6.
Many visual processes integrate information over protracted periods, a process known as temporal integration. One consequence of this is that objects that cast images that move across the retinal surfaces can generate blurred form signals, similar to the motion blur that can be captured in photographs taken with slow shutter speeds. Subjectively, retinal motion blur signals are suppressed from awareness, such that moving objects seem sharply defined. One suggestion has been that this subjective impression is due to humans not being able to distinguish between focussed and blurred moving objects. Contrary to this suggestion, here we report a novel illusion, and consequent experiments, that implicate a suppressive mechanism. We find that the apparent shape of circular moving objects can be distorted when their rear edges lag leading edges by ∼60 ms. Moreover, we find that sensitivity for detecting blur, and for discriminating between blur intensities, is uniformly worse for physical blurs added behind moving objects, as opposed to in-front. Also, it was easier to differentiate between slight and slightly greater physical blurs than it was to differentiate between slight blur and the absence of blur, both behind and in-front of moving edges. These 'dipper' functions suggest that blur signals must reach a threshold intensity before they can be detected, and that the relevant threshold is effectively elevated for blur signals trailing behind moving contours. In combination, these data suggest moving objects look sharply defined, at least in part, because of a functional adaptation that actively suppresses motion blur signals from awareness.
许多视觉过程会在较长时间内整合信息,这一过程被称为时间整合。其结果之一是,在视网膜表面投射移动图像的物体能够产生模糊的形状信号,类似于用慢快门速度拍摄的照片中出现的运动模糊。主观上,视网膜运动模糊信号会从意识中被抑制,以至于移动的物体看起来轮廓清晰。有一种观点认为,这种主观印象是由于人类无法区分聚焦的和模糊的移动物体。与这一观点相反,我们在此报告一种新的错觉及后续实验,这些表明存在一种抑制机制。我们发现,当圆形移动物体的后边缘比前边缘滞后约60毫秒时,其表观形状会发生扭曲。此外,我们发现,对于检测模糊以及区分模糊强度而言,在移动物体后面添加的物理模糊的敏感度,相较于在物体前面添加的情况,总体上更差。而且,区分轻微和稍大的物理模糊,比区分轻微模糊和无模糊更容易,无论是在移动边缘的后面还是前面。这些“勺状”函数表明,模糊信号在被检测到之前必须达到阈值强度,并且对于跟随在移动轮廓后面的模糊信号,相关阈值实际上会提高。综合来看,这些数据表明移动物体看起来轮廓清晰,至少部分原因是一种功能性适应,它能主动抑制意识中的运动模糊信号。