Gaines R, Price-Williams D
Department of Psychiatry, University of California, Los Angeles 90024.
Psychiatr J Univ Ott. 1990 Jun;15(2):107-10.
A study is presented comparing the imaginative modes of American and Balinese artists. Strict survey comparison has not been possible owing to the lack of certain artistic types in the comparative culture and smallness of sample. By using an interview approach, a paradigmatic difference between the artistic members of the two cultures can be demonstrated. In American artists there is a more individualistic approach to creative imagery, with a stronger reliance on their dreams. In Balinese artists the creative endeavor is more collective, depending on more conscious imagery drawn from myths and common beliefs. The difference is correlated with the philosophical and cultural settings of each society in which the artist is embedded. Exemplar statements from interviews are presented to illustrate and support these propositions. Finally, it has been suggested that creative imagery should also be viewed in the perspective of differing concepts of self in the two societies.
本文呈现了一项对比美国和巴厘岛艺术家想象模式的研究。由于对比文化中缺乏某些艺术类型且样本规模较小,严格的调查对比无法实现。通过采用访谈方法,可以证明两种文化的艺术成员之间存在范式差异。美国艺术家在创作意象方面更具个人主义倾向,对自己的梦境依赖更强。巴厘岛艺术家的创作努力则更具集体性,依赖于从神话和共同信仰中提取的更有意识的意象。这种差异与艺术家所处的每个社会的哲学和文化背景相关。文中给出了访谈中的典型陈述以说明和支持这些观点。最后,有人提出还应从两个社会中不同的自我概念角度来看待创作意象。