• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

两种潜入式牙种植体的边缘骨丧失和稳定性的临床评估。

Clinical evaluation of marginal bone loss and stability in two types of submerged dental implants.

机构信息

Department of Oral Implatology, Faculty of Dentistry, Istanbul University, Istanbul, Turkey.

出版信息

Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2013 May-Jun;28(3):815-23. doi: 10.11607/jomi.3087.

DOI:10.11607/jomi.3087
PMID:23748314
Abstract

PURPOSE

The aim of this prospective clinical trial was to compare the three-dimensional marginal bone level, implant stability, and peri-implant health of two types of submerged dental implants that were restored with matching or platform-switched abutments.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Twenty-five subjects were recruited (test group: 43 implants with internal conical connection and back-tapered collar carrying a platform-switched abutment; control group: 50 implants carrying a matched-platform abutment). Implant uncovering and conventional loading were performed after 3 months of healing, and the total observation time was 15 months. Marginal bone levels, resonance frequency analysis, insertion torque, and peri-implant health indices were recorded and analyzed statistically.

RESULTS

The cumulative implant survival rate was 100%. At the second-stage surgery, bone levels were similar between groups. One year after loading, mean crestal bone loss was 0.35 ± 0.13 mm for test implants and 0.83 ± 0.16 mm for control implants, a significant difference. Primary stability was significantly higher in the test group than in the control group, but this difference disappeared after 3 months of healing prior to loading. Between-group differences for peri-implant health indices were negligible.

CONCLUSIONS

Both implant systems had the same survival rates. Implants with a built-in platform switch and conical connection with back-tapered collar design achieved higher primary stability at insertion and less bone resorption after 15 months.

摘要

目的

本前瞻性临床试验旨在比较两种类型的潜入式牙种植体的三维边缘骨水平、种植体稳定性和种植体周围健康状况,这两种种植体分别使用匹配或平台转换基台进行修复。

材料和方法

共招募了 25 名受试者(试验组:43 个具有内部锥形连接和后锥形颈的种植体,带有平台转换基台;对照组:50 个带有匹配平台基台的种植体)。愈合 3 个月后进行种植体暴露和常规加载,总观察时间为 15 个月。记录和分析边缘骨水平、共振频率分析、插入扭矩和种植体周围健康指数。

结果

累积种植体存活率为 100%。在二期手术中,两组的骨水平相似。加载 1 年后,试验组种植体的平均颊侧骨吸收量为 0.35±0.13mm,对照组为 0.83±0.16mm,差异显著。试验组种植体的初始稳定性明显高于对照组,但在加载前愈合 3 个月后,这种差异消失。种植体周围健康指数的组间差异可以忽略不计。

结论

两种种植体系统的存活率相同。具有内置平台转换和后锥形颈设计的锥形连接种植体在植入时具有更高的初始稳定性,在 15 个月后吸收的骨质更少。

相似文献

1
Clinical evaluation of marginal bone loss and stability in two types of submerged dental implants.两种潜入式牙种植体的边缘骨丧失和稳定性的临床评估。
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2013 May-Jun;28(3):815-23. doi: 10.11607/jomi.3087.
2
Marginal bone response of implants with platform switching and non-platform switching abutments in posterior healed sites: a 1-year prospective study.后牙愈合部位采用平台转换和非平台转换基台的种植体边缘骨反应:一项为期1年的前瞻性研究。
Clin Oral Implants Res. 2015 Feb;26(2):220-7. doi: 10.1111/clr.12312. Epub 2014 Jan 3.
3
The influence of implant-abutment connection to peri-implant bone loss: A systematic review and meta-analysis.种植体-基台连接对种植体周围骨丧失的影响:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Clin Implant Dent Relat Res. 2018 Aug;20(4):653-664. doi: 10.1111/cid.12620. Epub 2018 May 15.
4
Peri-implant bone level around implants with platform-switched abutments: preliminary data from a prospective study.采用平台转换基台的种植体周围种植体周骨水平:一项前瞻性研究的初步数据。
J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2007 Jul;65(7 Suppl 1):33-9. doi: 10.1016/j.joms.2007.03.024.
5
The effect of healing abutment reconnection and disconnection on soft and hard peri-implant tissues: a short-term randomized controlled clinical trial.愈合基台再连接和断开对种植体周围软硬组织的影响:一项短期随机对照临床试验。
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2013 May-Jun;28(3):807-14. doi: 10.11607/jomi.3022.
6
Soft tissue and crestal bone changes around implants with platform-switched abutments placed nonsubmerged at subcrestal position: a 2-year clinical and radiographic evaluation.在非潜入式种植体平台转换基台位于牙槽嵴顶下方位置时,种植体周围软组织和牙槽嵴骨的变化:一项为期2年的临床和影像学评估
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2015 Nov-Dec;30(6):1369-77. doi: 10.11607/jomi.4017. Epub 2015 Oct 16.
7
A randomized prospective multicenter trial evaluating the platform-switching technique for the prevention of postrestorative crestal bone loss.一项评估平台转换技术预防修复后牙槽嵴骨吸收的随机前瞻性多中心试验。
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2009 Mar-Apr;24(2):299-308.
8
Influence of the size of the microgap on crestal bone levels in non-submerged dental implants: a radiographic study in the canine mandible.微间隙大小对非潜入式牙种植体嵴顶骨水平的影响:犬下颌骨的影像学研究
J Periodontol. 2002 Oct;73(10):1111-7. doi: 10.1902/jop.2002.73.10.1111.
9
A randomized controlled clinical trial to assess crestal bone remodeling of four different implant designs.一项评估四种不同种植体设计的种植体嵴顶骨重塑的随机对照临床试验。
Clin Implant Dent Relat Res. 2018 Aug;20(4):455-462. doi: 10.1111/cid.12604. Epub 2018 Mar 25.
10
Crestal bone changes around titanium implants. A histometric evaluation of unloaded non-submerged and submerged implants in the canine mandible.钛种植体周围的嵴顶骨变化。犬下颌骨中未加载的非潜入式和潜入式种植体的组织计量学评估。
J Periodontol. 2000 Sep;71(9):1412-24. doi: 10.1902/jop.2000.71.9.1412.

引用本文的文献

1
The influence of prosthetic designs on peri-implant bone loss: An AO/AAP systematic review and meta-analysis.修复体设计对种植体周围骨吸收的影响:一项AO/AAP系统评价与Meta分析
J Periodontol. 2025 Jun;96(6):634-651. doi: 10.1002/JPER.24-0144. Epub 2025 Jun 9.
2
Evaluation of Internal and External Hexagon Connections in Immediately Loaded Full-Arch Rehabilitations: A Multicenter Randomized Split-Mouth Controlled Trial With a 6-Year Follow-Up.即刻负重全牙弓修复中内外六角连接的评估:一项为期6年随访的多中心随机分口对照试验
Clin Implant Dent Relat Res. 2025 Feb;27(1):e13416. doi: 10.1111/cid.13416. Epub 2024 Nov 6.
3
Effect of vertical implant position on marginal bone loss: a randomized clinical trial.
垂直种植体位置对边缘骨丧失的影响:一项随机临床试验。
BMC Oral Health. 2024 Jun 24;24(1):727. doi: 10.1186/s12903-024-04480-7.
4
Analysis of Biomarkers and Marginal Bone Loss in Platform-Switched and Nonplatform-Switched Implants: A Randomized Clinical Trial.种植体平台转换与非平台转换对生物标志物及边缘骨吸收的影响:一项随机临床试验
Biomed Res Int. 2022 May 21;2022:2603287. doi: 10.1155/2022/2603287. eCollection 2022.
5
Clinical Performance of a Novel Two-Piece Abutment Concept: Results from a Prospective Study with a 1-Year Follow-Up.新型两件式基台概念的临床性能:一项为期1年随访的前瞻性研究结果
J Clin Med. 2021 Apr 9;10(8):1594. doi: 10.3390/jcm10081594.
6
The clinical significance of implant stability quotient (ISQ) measurements: A literature review.种植体稳定性商数(ISQ)测量的临床意义:文献综述。
J Oral Biol Craniofac Res. 2020 Oct-Dec;10(4):629-638. doi: 10.1016/j.jobcr.2020.07.004. Epub 2020 Aug 14.
7
Influence of marginal bone loss on peri-implantitis: Systematic review of literature.边缘骨丢失对种植体周围炎的影响:文献系统综述
J Clin Exp Dent. 2019 Nov 1;11(11):e1045-e1071. doi: 10.4317/jced.56202. eCollection 2019 Nov.
8
A prospective multicenter evaluation of immediately functionalized tapered conical connection implants for single restorations in maxillary anterior and premolar sites: 3-year results.一项前瞻性多中心研究评估在上颌前牙和前磨牙部位进行单颗修复时使用即刻功能性锥形连接种植体:3 年研究结果。
Clin Oral Investig. 2019 Apr;23(4):1877-1885. doi: 10.1007/s00784-018-2614-8. Epub 2018 Sep 17.
9
Clinical evaluation of the stability of implants placed at different supracrestal levels.不同龈上水平植入种植体稳定性的临床评估。
J Istanb Univ Fac Dent. 2016 Oct 1;50(3):21-31. doi: 10.17096/jiufd.96003. eCollection 2016.
10
An open prospective single cohort multicenter study evaluating the novel, tapered, conical connection implants supporting single crowns in the anterior and premolar maxilla: interim 1-year results.一项开放式前瞻性单队列多中心研究,评估新型锥形连接种植体在前牙和上颌前磨牙区支持单冠的 1 年中期结果。
Clin Oral Investig. 2017 Jul;21(6):2133-2142. doi: 10.1007/s00784-016-2003-0. Epub 2016 Nov 18.