Deacon Robert M J
Department of Experimental Psychology, University of Oxford.
J Vis Exp. 2013 May 29(75):e2609. doi: 10.3791/2609.
Mice are increasingly being used in behavioral neuroscience, largely replacing rats as the behaviorist's animal of choice. Before aspects of behavior such as emotionality or cognition can be assessed, however, it is vital to determine whether the motor capabilities of e.g. a mutant or lesioned mouse allow such an assessment. Performance on a maze task requiring strength and coordination, such as the Morris water maze, might well be impaired in a mouse by motor, rather than cognitive, impairments, so it is essential to selectively dissect the latter from the former. For example, sensorimotor impairments caused by NMDA antagonists have been shown to impair water maze performance(2). Motor coordination has traditionally been assessed in mice and rats by the rotarod test, in which the animal is placed on a horizontal rod that rotates about its long axis; the animal must walk forwards to remain upright and not fall off. Both set speed and accelerating versions of the rotarod are available. The other three tests described in this article (horizontal bar, static rods and parallel bars) all measure coordination on static apparatus. The horizontal bar also requires strength for adequate performance, particularly of the forelimbs as the mouse initially grips the bar just with the front paws. Adult rats do not perform well on tests such as the static rods and parallel bars (personal observations); they appear less well coordinated than mice. I have only tested male rats, however, and male mice seem generally less well coordinated than females. Mice appear to have a higher strength:weight ratio than rats; the Latin name, Mus musculus, seems entirely appropriate. The rotarod, the variations of the foot fault test(12) or the Catwalk (Noldus)(15) apparatus are generally used to assess motor coordination in rats.
小鼠在行为神经科学中的应用越来越广泛,在很大程度上取代了大鼠,成为行为学家首选的实验动物。然而,在评估诸如情绪或认知等行为方面之前,至关重要的是要确定例如突变小鼠或脑损伤小鼠的运动能力是否允许进行这样的评估。在需要力量和协调性的迷宫任务(如莫里斯水迷宫)中的表现,很可能会因运动障碍而非认知障碍而在小鼠中受损,所以有必要将后者与前者区分开来。例如,已证明NMDA拮抗剂引起的感觉运动障碍会损害水迷宫表现(2)。传统上,小鼠和大鼠的运动协调性是通过转棒试验来评估的,即将动物放在一根绕其长轴旋转的水平杆上;动物必须向前走以保持直立不掉落。转棒试验有设定速度和加速两种版本。本文描述的其他三项测试(单杠、静态杆和平行杆)均测量在静态器械上的协调性。单杠测试也需要力量才能有良好表现,特别是前肢力量,因为小鼠最初只用前爪抓住单杠。成年大鼠在诸如静态杆和平行杆等测试中表现不佳(个人观察);它们看起来比小鼠协调性差。然而,我只测试过雄性大鼠,而且雄性小鼠似乎总体上比雌性小鼠协调性差。小鼠的力量与体重比似乎比大鼠更高;其拉丁名Mus musculus似乎非常贴切。转棒试验、足部失误测试(12)的变体或Catwalk(Noldus)仪器通常用于评估大鼠的运动协调性。