Jefferson Medical College, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
Postgrad Med. 2013 May;125(3):162-71. doi: 10.3810/pgm.2013.05.2669.
To compare excessive sleepiness and quality of life (QoL) scores in shift workers who report having a diagnosis of shift work disorder (SWD) with those who report having no such diagnosis.
An Internet-based survey was conducted between March and April 2009 that included shift workers with or without a self-reported diagnosis of SWD. Participation required working ≥ 21 hours/week for 2 weeks prior, a diagnosis of SWD or a score of ≥ 10 on the Epworth Sleepiness Scale, and a score of ≥ 5 on any subscale of the Sheehan Disability Scale.
Surveys included 260 shift workers (103 with an SWD diagnosis and 157 without an SWD diagnosis). Diagnosed and undiagnosed respondents demonstrated similar Epworth Sleepiness Scale (13.7 vs 13.6, respectively) and Karolinska Sleepiness Scale (6.0 vs 5.5, respectively) scores. Sheehan Disability Scale social life and family life scores were similar between the 2 groups, although diagnosed respondents had a greater mean Sheehan Disability Scale work disability score compared with undiagnosed respondents (6.7 vs 5.5; P < 0.0001). Quality of life was more impaired in diagnosed patients in terms of ability to drive safely, propensity for accidents, work performance, and anxiety (P ≤ 0.039 vs undiagnosed). Work-related accidents (16% vs 5%; P = 0.0076) and injuries at work (17% vs 7%; P = 0.0233) were also reported by more diagnosed respondents than by undiagnosed respondents. Many respondents used caffeine and 57% of diagnosed respondents received prescription medication to treat symptoms of SWD.
Individuals with diagnosed SWD demonstrated impairment in QoL and reported more work-related accidents and injuries, although many measures of QoL and prescription drug use were similar between groups. Shift work disorder is underrecognized by clinicians and patients, resulting in undertreatment, despite the availability of several behavioral and therapeutic treatment options.
比较报告患有轮班工作障碍(SWD)诊断的轮班工作者与未报告此类诊断的轮班工作者的过度嗜睡和生活质量(QoL)评分。
2009 年 3 月至 4 月期间进行了一项基于互联网的调查,其中包括报告患有或未报告患有 SWD 的轮班工作者。参与调查需要在过去两周内每周工作≥21 小时,并且Epworth 嗜睡量表的评分为≥10,Sheehan 残疾量表的任何子量表的评分为≥5。
调查包括 260 名轮班工作者(103 名患有 SWD 诊断,157 名未患有 SWD 诊断)。诊断和未诊断的受访者的 Epworth 嗜睡量表(分别为 13.7 和 13.6)和 Karolinska 嗜睡量表(分别为 6.0 和 5.5)评分相似。两组的 Sheehan 残疾量表社会生活和家庭生活评分相似,但与未诊断的受访者相比,诊断的受访者的 Sheehan 残疾量表工作障碍评分更高(6.7 对 5.5;P<0.0001)。在安全驾驶能力、发生事故的倾向、工作表现和焦虑方面,诊断患者的生活质量受损更为严重(P≤0.039 对未诊断)。与未诊断的受访者相比,更多的诊断受访者报告了工作相关事故(16%对 5%;P=0.0076)和工作中受伤(17%对 7%;P=0.0233)。许多受访者使用咖啡因,57%的诊断受访者接受处方药物治疗 SWD 症状。
尽管有几种行为和治疗选择,但患有确诊的 SWD 的个体的 QoL 受损,并报告了更多的工作相关事故和伤害,尽管两组之间的许多 QoL 措施和处方药使用情况相似。SWD 并未得到临床医生和患者的充分认识,导致治疗不足。