• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

儿童心理健康结果的简短测量的心理计量学研究。

Psychometric investigation of a brief measure of outcomes in children's mental health.

机构信息

Community Care Behavioral Health Organization, 112 Washington Place, Suite 700, Pittsburgh, PA, 15219, USA,

出版信息

Community Ment Health J. 2014 Feb;50(2):204-8. doi: 10.1007/s10597-013-9627-1. Epub 2013 Jun 8.

DOI:10.1007/s10597-013-9627-1
PMID:23748555
Abstract

The current investigation sought to provide reliability and validity evidence for the Child Outcomes Survey (COS), a brief measure designed with a dual purpose to measure functioning and therapeutic relationship and to serve as a clinician-caregiver communication tool. Exploratory (EFA) and confirmatory factor analyses (CFA) were performed using a sample of 774 responses collected from 15 provider sites throughout the state of Pennsylvania. Results of the EFA (n = 387) uncovered a three factor structure (family functioning, child functioning, and therapeutic relationship) which was confirmed in the CFA (n = 387). The internal consistency reliability of the three subscales ranged from α = .76 to α = .91. There was a significant relationship between the therapeutic relationship subscale and the use of the COS as a communication aid (r s = .50, p < .001). Findings support the COS as an accurate measure of functioning and therapeutic relationship and its utility as a communication aid between clinician and caregiver.

摘要

本研究旨在为儿童结果调查(COS)提供信度和效度证据,该调查是一种简短的测量工具,具有双重目的,即测量功能和治疗关系,并作为临床医生-照顾者沟通工具。使用来自宾夕法尼亚州 15 个提供者站点的 774 个响应的样本进行了探索性(EFA)和验证性因子分析(CFA)。EFA(n = 387)的结果发现了一个三因素结构(家庭功能、儿童功能和治疗关系),在 CFA(n = 387)中得到了确认。三个分量表的内部一致性信度范围从α=.76 到α=.91。治疗关系分量表与 COS 作为沟通辅助工具的使用之间存在显著关系(rs =.50,p <.001)。研究结果支持 COS 作为功能和治疗关系的准确测量工具,以及其作为临床医生和照顾者之间沟通辅助工具的效用。

相似文献

1
Psychometric investigation of a brief measure of outcomes in children's mental health.儿童心理健康结果的简短测量的心理计量学研究。
Community Ment Health J. 2014 Feb;50(2):204-8. doi: 10.1007/s10597-013-9627-1. Epub 2013 Jun 8.
2
[Validation of the QFS measuring the frequency and satisfaction in social behaviours in psychiatric adult population].[用于评估成年精神病患者社交行为频率与满意度的QFS量表的验证]
Encephale. 2006 Jan-Feb;32(1 Pt 1):45-59. doi: 10.1016/s0013-7006(06)76136-x.
3
Reliability and validity of the Japanese version of the INSPIRE measure of staff support for personal recovery in community mental health service users in Japan.日本版 INSPIRE 量表评估社区精神卫生服务使用者个人康复中工作人员支持的信度和效度。
BMC Psychiatry. 2020 Feb 7;20(1):51. doi: 10.1186/s12888-020-2467-y.
4
Development and psychometric properties of a new brief scale for subjective personal agency (SPA-5) in people with schizophrenia.主观个人能动性新简式量表(SPA-5)在精神分裂症患者中的编制及心理测量学特性研究。
Epidemiol Psychiatr Sci. 2020 Apr 10;29:e111. doi: 10.1017/S2045796020000256.
5
Reliability and validity of a treatment adherence measure for child psychiatric rehabilitation.儿童精神康复治疗依从性测量的信度和效度。
Psychiatr Rehabil J. 2012 Sep;35(5):369-375. doi: 10.1037/h0094495.
6
Psychometric study of the Aberrant Behavior Checklist in Fragile X Syndrome and implications for targeted treatment.脆性 X 综合征的 Aberrant Behavior Checklist 的心理测量学研究及其对靶向治疗的意义。
J Autism Dev Disord. 2012 Jul;42(7):1377-92. doi: 10.1007/s10803-011-1370-2.
7
[Clinical Validation of the Caregiver-Child Socioemotional and Relationship Rating Scale (SIRS) for Child Behavior in a Preschool-Age Sample].[针对学龄前儿童样本中儿童行为的照顾者-儿童社会情感与关系评定量表(SIRS)的临床验证]
Prax Kinderpsychol Kinderpsychiatr. 2017 Mar;66(3):209-223. doi: 10.13109/prkk.2017.66.3.209.
8
Utility of the PedsQL™ family impact module: assessing the psychometric properties in a community sample.儿科生活质量问卷家庭影响模块的效用:在社区样本中评估心理测量特性。
Qual Life Res. 2013 Dec;22(10):2899-907. doi: 10.1007/s11136-013-0422-9. Epub 2013 Apr 27.
9
Development of a social inclusion index to capture subjective and objective life domains (Phase II): psychometric development study.发展一个社会包容指数来捕捉主观和客观的生活领域(第二阶段):心理测量发展研究。
Health Technol Assess. 2012;16(1):iii-vii, ix-xii, -1-241. doi: 10.3310/hta16010.
10
Parenting and Family Adjustment Scales (PAFAS): validation of a brief parent-report measure for use in assessment of parenting skills and family relationships.育儿与家庭适应量表(PAFAS):一种用于评估育儿技能和家庭关系的简短家长报告测量工具的效度验证
Child Psychiatry Hum Dev. 2014 Jun;45(3):255-72. doi: 10.1007/s10578-013-0397-3.

引用本文的文献

1
Key Issues in the First Year of Transition for a Large Medicaid-Funded Children's Service.大型医疗补助计划资助的儿童服务机构转制第一年的关键问题。
Community Ment Health J. 2024 Apr;60(3):504-514. doi: 10.1007/s10597-023-01201-2. Epub 2023 Oct 25.
2
Association of Therapeutic Alliance with Outcomes Over Two Years in Youth and Family Service.青少年及家庭服务中治疗联盟与两年治疗效果的关联
Community Ment Health J. 2018 Oct;54(7):935-943. doi: 10.1007/s10597-018-0275-3. Epub 2018 Apr 26.
3
A Pilot Evaluation of the Rapid Response Program: A Home Based Family Therapy.

本文引用的文献

1
Use of outcomes information in child mental health treatment: results from a pilot study.儿童心理健康治疗中结局信息的使用:一项试点研究的结果。
Psychiatr Serv. 2010 Dec;61(12):1211-6. doi: 10.1176/ps.2010.61.12.1211.
2
Systematic use of patient-rated depression severity monitoring: is it helpful and feasible in clinical psychiatry?系统使用患者自评抑郁严重程度监测:在临床精神病学中是否有用且可行?
Psychiatr Serv. 2008 Oct;59(10):1148-54. doi: 10.1176/ps.2008.59.10.1148.
3
Promoting the value and practice of shared decision-making in mental health care.
快速反应计划的初步评估:一种基于家庭的家庭治疗
Community Ment Health J. 2018 Apr;54(3):302-311. doi: 10.1007/s10597-018-0231-2. Epub 2018 Jan 16.
促进精神卫生保健中共同决策的价值与实践。
Psychiatr Rehabil J. 2007 Summer;31(1):54-61. doi: 10.2975/31.1.2007.54.61.
4
Monitoring patient improvement and treatment outcomes in managed behavioral health.监测管理式行为健康中的患者改善情况和治疗结果。
J Healthc Qual. 2007 Mar-Apr;29(2):4-12. doi: 10.1111/j.1945-1474.2007.tb00178.x.
5
The Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire: U.S. normative data and psychometric properties.长处与困难问卷:美国常模数据及心理测量特性。
J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry. 2005 Jun;44(6):557-64. doi: 10.1097/01.chi.0000159157.57075.c8.
6
Improving outcomes for poorly responding clients: the use of clinical support tools and feedback to clients.改善反应不佳客户的治疗效果:临床支持工具的使用及向客户提供反馈。
J Clin Psychol. 2005 Feb;61(2):175-85. doi: 10.1002/jclp.20109.
7
The Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire: a research note.优势与困难问卷:一篇研究笔记。
J Child Psychol Psychiatry. 1997 Jul;38(5):581-6. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-7610.1997.tb01545.x.
8
Effective physician-patient communication and health outcomes: a review.有效的医患沟通与健康结局:综述
CMAJ. 1995 May 1;152(9):1423-33.