• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

系统使用患者自评抑郁严重程度监测:在临床精神病学中是否有用且可行?

Systematic use of patient-rated depression severity monitoring: is it helpful and feasible in clinical psychiatry?

作者信息

Duffy Farifteh Firoozmand, Chung Henry, Trivedi Madhukar, Rae Donald S, Regier Darrel A, Katzelnick David J

机构信息

American Psychiatric Institutefor Research and Education, Arlington, VA 22209, USA.

出版信息

Psychiatr Serv. 2008 Oct;59(10):1148-54. doi: 10.1176/ps.2008.59.10.1148.

DOI:10.1176/ps.2008.59.10.1148
PMID:18832500
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

The gap between evidence-based treatments and routine care has been well established. Findings from the Sequenced Treatments Alternatives to Relieve Depression (STAR*D) emphasized the importance of measurement-based care for the treatment of depression as a key ingredient for achieving response and remission; yet measurement-based care approaches are not commonly used in clinical practice.

METHODS

The Nine-Item Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ-9) for monitoring depression severity was introduced in 19 diverse psychiatric practices. During the one-year course of the project the helpfulness and feasibility of implementation of PHQ-9 in these psychiatric practices were studied. The project was modeled after the Institute for Healthcare Improvement Breakthrough Series. Two of the 19 practices dropped out during the course of the project.

RESULTS

By the conclusion of the study, all remaining 17 practices had adopted PHQ-9 as a routine part of depression care in their practice. On the basis of responses from 17 psychiatrists from those practices, PHQ-9 scores influenced clinical decision making for 93% of 6,096 patient contacts. With the additional information gained from the PHQ-9 score, one or more treatment changes occurred during 40% of these clinical contacts. Changing the dosage of antidepressant medication and adding another medication were the most common treatment changes recorded by psychiatrists, followed by starting or increasing psychotherapy and by switching or initiating antidepressants. In 3% of the patient contacts, using the PHQ-9 led to additional suicide risk assessment.

CONCLUSIONS

The study findings suggest that adopting measurement-based care, such as using the PHQ-9, is achievable, even in practices with limited resources.

摘要

目的

循证治疗与常规护理之间的差距已得到充分证实。缓解抑郁症的序贯治疗替代方案(STAR*D)的研究结果强调了基于测量的护理对于抑郁症治疗的重要性,这是实现缓解和痊愈的关键因素;然而,基于测量的护理方法在临床实践中并不常用。

方法

在19个不同的精神科诊所引入了用于监测抑郁严重程度的九项患者健康问卷(PHQ - 9)。在该项目为期一年的过程中,研究了在这些精神科诊所实施PHQ - 9的有效性和可行性。该项目仿照医疗保健改进研究所的突破系列进行。在项目过程中,19个诊所中有2个退出。

结果

到研究结束时,所有剩余的17个诊所都已将PHQ - 9作为其抑郁症护理的常规组成部分。根据这些诊所的17位精神科医生的反馈,在6096次患者接触中,93%的接触中PHQ - 9评分影响了临床决策。利用从PHQ - 9评分中获得的额外信息,在40%的这些临床接触过程中发生了一项或多项治疗调整。精神科医生记录的最常见治疗调整是改变抗抑郁药物的剂量和添加另一种药物,其次是开始或增加心理治疗以及更换或开始使用抗抑郁药。在3%的患者接触中,使用PHQ - 9导致了额外的自杀风险评估。

结论

研究结果表明,即使在资源有限的诊所,采用基于测量的护理,如使用PHQ - 9,也是可行的。

相似文献

1
Systematic use of patient-rated depression severity monitoring: is it helpful and feasible in clinical psychiatry?系统使用患者自评抑郁严重程度监测:在临床精神病学中是否有用且可行?
Psychiatr Serv. 2008 Oct;59(10):1148-54. doi: 10.1176/ps.2008.59.10.1148.
2
Enhancing electronic health record measurement of depression severity and suicide ideation: a Distributed Ambulatory Research in Therapeutics Network (DARTNet) study.增强电子健康记录对抑郁严重程度和自杀意念的测量:分布式门诊研究治疗网络(DARTNet)研究。
J Am Board Fam Med. 2012 Sep-Oct;25(5):582-93. doi: 10.3122/jabfm.2012.05.110053.
3
Depression outcomes in psychiatric clinical practice: using a self-rated measure of depression severity.精神科临床实践中的抑郁结局:使用自评抑郁严重程度量表。
Psychiatr Serv. 2011 Aug;62(8):929-35. doi: 10.1176/ps.62.8.pss6208_0929.
4
The accuracy of Patient Health Questionnaire-9 in detecting depression and measuring depression severity in high-risk groups in primary care.患者健康问卷-9在基层医疗中高危人群抑郁检测及抑郁严重程度测量方面的准确性。
Gen Hosp Psychiatry. 2009 Sep-Oct;31(5):451-9. doi: 10.1016/j.genhosppsych.2009.06.001. Epub 2009 Jul 10.
5
Screening for depression and suicidality in a VA primary care setting: 2 items are better than 1 item.在退伍军人事务部(VA)初级保健机构中筛查抑郁症和自杀倾向:两项筛查比一项更好。
Am J Manag Care. 2004 Nov;10(11 Pt 2):839-45.
6
Double-disease management or one care manager for two chronic conditions: pilot feasibility study of nurse telephonic disease management for depression and congestive heart failure.双重疾病管理或一名护理经理负责两种慢性病:抑郁症和充血性心力衰竭的护士电话疾病管理试点可行性研究。
Dis Manag. 2006 Oct;9(5):266-76. doi: 10.1089/dis.2006.9.266.
7
Sustaining practice change one year after completion of the national depression management leadership initiative.全国抑郁症管理领导倡议完成一年后,持续实践变革。
Psychiatr Serv. 2013 Jul 1;64(7):703-6. doi: 10.1176/appi.ps.201200227.
8
Psychometric comparison of PHQ-9 and HADS for measuring depression severity in primary care.用于测量初级保健中抑郁严重程度的患者健康问卷-9(PHQ-9)与医院焦虑抑郁量表(HADS)的心理测量学比较
Br J Gen Pract. 2008 Jan;58(546):32-6. doi: 10.3399/bjgp08X263794.
9
Physician actions following a positive PHQ-2: implications for the implementation of depression screening in family medicine practice.PHQ-2呈阳性后医生的行为:对家庭医学实践中抑郁症筛查实施的影响
Fam Syst Health. 2015 Mar;33(1):18-27. doi: 10.1037/fsh0000089. Epub 2014 Dec 8.
10
The Patient Health Questionnaire-2: validity of a two-item depression screener.患者健康问卷-2:一项两项抑郁症筛查工具的效度
Med Care. 2003 Nov;41(11):1284-92. doi: 10.1097/01.MLR.0000093487.78664.3C.

引用本文的文献

1
Differences across race and ethnicity in the quality of antidepressant medication management.抗抑郁药物管理质量在种族和民族方面的差异。
Health Serv Res. 2024 Oct;59(5):e14347. doi: 10.1111/1475-6773.14347. Epub 2024 Jul 5.
2
Facilitators and barriers to implementation of suicide prevention interventions: Scoping review.自杀预防干预措施实施的促进因素和障碍:范围综述
Glob Ment Health (Camb). 2023 Mar 13;10:e15. doi: 10.1017/gmh.2023.9. eCollection 2023.
3
Differences in Center for Epidemiologic Studies Depression Scale, Generalized Anxiety Disorder-7 and Kessler Screening Scale for Psychological Distress Scores between Smartphone Version versus Paper Version Administration: Evidence of Equivalence.
智能手机版与纸质版在流行病学研究抑郁量表、广泛性焦虑症-7 量表和凯斯勒心理困扰筛查量表评分方面的差异:等效性证据。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2023 Mar 8;20(6):4773. doi: 10.3390/ijerph20064773.
4
Screening for Depression in Mobile Devices Using Patient Health Questionnaire-9 (PHQ-9) Data: A Diagnostic Meta-Analysis via Machine Learning Methods.使用患者健康问卷-9(PHQ-9)数据在移动设备中筛查抑郁症:通过机器学习方法进行的诊断性荟萃分析
Neuropsychiatr Dis Treat. 2021 Nov 20;17:3415-3430. doi: 10.2147/NDT.S339412. eCollection 2021.
5
Mental burden and its risk and protective factors during the early phase of the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic: systematic review and meta-analyses.SARS-CoV-2 大流行早期的精神负担及其风险和保护因素:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Global Health. 2021 Mar 29;17(1):34. doi: 10.1186/s12992-021-00670-y.
6
Variation In The Effectiveness Of Collaborative Care For Depression: Does It Matter Where You Get Your Care?抑郁症协作护理效果的差异:在哪里接受护理重要吗?
Health Aff (Millwood). 2020 Nov;39(11):1943-1950. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.2019.01714.
7
International Consortium on the Genetics of Electroconvulsive Therapy and Severe Depressive Disorders (Gen-ECT-ic).国际电休克与重度抑郁障碍遗传学研究联盟(Gen-ECT-ic)。
Eur Arch Psychiatry Clin Neurosci. 2020 Oct;270(7):921-932. doi: 10.1007/s00406-019-01087-w. Epub 2019 Dec 4.
8
Measurement-based Care in Psychiatry-Past, Present, and Future.精神病学中基于测量的治疗——过去、现在与未来
Innov Clin Neurosci. 2018 Nov 1;15(11-12):13-26.
9
Explication of a Behavioral Health-Primary Care Integration Learning Collaborative and Its Quality Improvement Implications.行为健康与初级保健整合学习协作组织的阐释及其对质量改进的启示。
Community Ment Health J. 2018 Nov;54(8):1109-1115. doi: 10.1007/s10597-017-0230-8. Epub 2018 Jan 11.
10
Establishing Clinical Cutoffs for Response and Remission on the Screen for Child Anxiety Related Emotional Disorders (SCARED).确定儿童焦虑相关情绪障碍筛查量表(SCARED)中反应和缓解的临床临界值。
J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry. 2017 Aug;56(8):696-702. doi: 10.1016/j.jaac.2017.05.018. Epub 2017 Jun 6.