Prezio Elizabeth A, Balasubramanian Bijal A, Shuval Kerem, Cheng Dunlei, Kendzor Darla E, Culica Dan
1University of Texas School of Public Health, Dallas, TX.
Am J Med Qual. 2014 Mar-Apr;29(2):124-34. doi: 10.1177/1062860613489165. Epub 2013 Jun 7.
The objective of this article is to quantify quality improvement using data from a randomized controlled trial that tested the effectiveness of a community health worker in the primary role of diabetes educator in a clinic serving uninsured Mexican Americans. The intervention group received 7 hours of diabetes education/case management in excess of usual medical care. Of 16 process and outcome measures evaluated, the intervention group was significantly more likely to have received a dilated retinal examination, and 53% achieved a hemoglobin A1c below 7% compared with 38% of the control group participants. Composite quality measures were similar in magnitude with published practice-based benchmarks at study conclusion. This suggests that the overall diabetes care delivered in this clinic serving uninsured patients was comparable to the levels of excellence achieved in other primary care settings. Quantitative measurements of quality improvement can inform health policy regarding the relative effectiveness of diabetes interventions.
本文的目的是利用一项随机对照试验的数据来量化质量改进情况。该试验测试了社区卫生工作者在一家为未参保墨西哥裔美国人服务的诊所中担任糖尿病教育主要角色的有效性。干预组除接受常规医疗护理外,还接受了7小时的糖尿病教育/病例管理。在评估的16项过程和结果指标中,干预组接受散瞳视网膜检查的可能性显著更高,53%的干预组患者糖化血红蛋白低于7%,而对照组参与者的这一比例为38%。在研究结束时,综合质量指标的幅度与已发表的基于实践的基准相似。这表明,这家为未参保患者服务的诊所提供的整体糖尿病护理与其他初级保健机构所达到的卓越水平相当。质量改进的定量测量可为有关糖尿病干预措施相对有效性的卫生政策提供参考。