Department of General Internal Medicine, UT MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX 77030, USA.
Drugs Aging. 2013 Sep;30(9):655-66. doi: 10.1007/s40266-013-0095-7.
Given the growing number of older adults with multimorbidity who are prescribed multiple medications, clinicians need to prioritize which medications are most likely to benefit and least likely to harm an individual patient. The concept of time to benefit (TTB) is increasingly discussed in addition to other measures of drug effectiveness in order to understand and contextualize the benefits and harms of a therapy to an individual patient. However, how to glean this information from available evidence is not well established. The lack of such information for clinicians highlights a critical need in the design and reporting of clinical trials to provide information most relevant to decision making for older adults with multimorbidity. We define TTB as the time until a statistically significant benefit is observed in trials of people taking a therapy compared to a control group not taking the therapy. Similarly, time to harm (TTH) is the time until a statistically significant adverse effect is seen in a trial for the treatment group compared to the control group. To determine both TTB and TTH, it is critical that we also clearly define the benefit or harm under consideration. Well-defined benefits or harms are clinically meaningful, measurable outcomes that are desired (or shunned) by patients. In this conceptual review, we illustrate concepts of TTB in randomized controlled trials (RCTs) of statins for the primary prevention of cardiovascular disease. Using published results, we estimate probable TTB for statins with the future goal of using such information to improve prescribing decisions for individual patients. Knowing the relative TTBs and TTHs associated with a patient's medications could be immensely useful to a clinician in decision making for their older patients with multimorbidity. We describe the challenges in defining and determining TTB and TTH, and discuss possible ways of analyzing and reporting trial results that would add more information about this aspect of drug effectiveness to the clinician's evidence base.
鉴于患有多种疾病且需要服用多种药物的老年人数量不断增加,临床医生需要确定哪些药物最有可能对患者产生益处,哪些药物最不可能对患者造成伤害。除了其他衡量药物有效性的指标外,时间效益(TTB)的概念越来越多地被讨论,以便了解和理解治疗对个体患者的益处和危害。然而,如何从现有证据中获取这些信息还没有得到很好的确定。临床医生缺乏这些信息,突出了在临床试验的设计和报告中需要提供与患有多种疾病的老年人决策最相关的信息的迫切需要。我们将 TTB 定义为接受治疗的人群与未接受治疗的对照组相比,观察到统计学显著益处所需的时间。同样,治疗组与对照组相比,在试验中观察到统计学显著不良事件所需的时间称为时间到危害(TTH)。为了确定 TTB 和 TTH,我们必须清楚地定义所考虑的益处或危害。定义明确的益处或危害是临床有意义、可衡量的、患者所期望(或回避)的结果。在本概念性综述中,我们以他汀类药物用于心血管疾病一级预防的随机对照试验(RCT)为例,说明了 TTB 的概念。使用已发表的结果,我们估计了他汀类药物的 TTB,未来的目标是利用这些信息来改善个体患者的处方决策。了解与患者药物相关的 TTB 和 TTH 的相对值,对于多病症老年患者的临床医生在决策方面可能非常有用。我们描述了定义和确定 TTB 和 TTH 的挑战,并讨论了分析和报告试验结果的可能方法,这些方法将为临床医生的证据基础增加有关药物有效性的这一方面的更多信息。