Cay Nurdan, Unal Ozlem, Kartal Merve G, Ozdemir Mustafa, Tola Muharrem
aDepartment of Radiology, Ataturk Education and Research Hospital, Ankara bDepartment of Radiology, Derince Education and Research Hospital, Kocaeli cDepartment of Radiology, Yuksek Ihtisas Education and Research Hospital, Ankara, Turkey.
Blood Coagul Fibrinolysis. 2013 Oct;24(7):727-31. doi: 10.1097/MBC.0b013e32836261fe.
Previous studies have demonstrated a significant association between red blood cell distribution width (RDW) and acute pulmonary embolism. To the authors' knowledge no study has been reported in patients with deep venous thrombosis (DVT). A total of 431 lower extremity venous duplex examinations were included in the study. Of these, 216 examinations with the diagnosis of DVT were compared to 215 examinations with normal duplex findings with respect to RDW. The two groups were well matched. DVT group had a higher median value and the interquartile range (25th and 75th) of RDW (%) level [14.9 (14.2-16.7)] compared to control group [14.4 (13.6-15.2); P < 0.001], respectively. Patients were divided into tertiles based on RDW. DVT was detected in 42 patients (31.6%) in the lowest tertile, in 81 (53.3%) in the middle tertile, and in 93 (63.7%) in the highest tertile (P < 0.001). In multivariate analysis after adjustment for confounding variables, RDW was the only parameter to predict the presence of DVT [odds ratio (OR) 1.37; 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.21-1.55; P < 0.001]. After removing patients with chronic DVT, the interquartile range (25th and 75th) of the RDW (%) level was also higher in the DVT group [15.0 (14.2-16.7)] compared with the control group [14.4 (13.6-15.2); P < 0.001], respectively. In addition, in proximal DVT, the significant difference continued to be present, although this significance was lost in distal DVT [14.4% (13.6-15.2) vs. 16.1% (15.1-17.4), P < 0.001 and 14.4% (13.6-15.2) vs. 14.3% (14.2-14.7), P = 0.959]. In multivariate analysis, RDW was an independent predictor of risk of proximal DVT (OR 1.60; 95% CI 1.39-1.84; P < 0.001). RDW (%) level was significantly higher in patients with bilateral DVT than in patients with unilateral DVT [16.0 (14.8-17.1) vs. 14.4 (14.2-14.8), P < 0.001, respectively]. In receiver operating characteristics curve analysis, RDW more than 14.9% had 85% sensitivity and 73% specificity in predicting proximal DVT. RDW, an inexpensive and easily measurable laboratory variable, was independently and significantly associated with the presence and severity of DVT, especially nonchronic proximal DVT. The mechanism of association requires, however, further study.
既往研究已证实红细胞分布宽度(RDW)与急性肺栓塞之间存在显著关联。据作者所知,尚未有关于深静脉血栓形成(DVT)患者的相关研究报道。本研究共纳入431例下肢静脉双功超声检查。其中,将216例诊断为DVT的检查与215例双功超声检查结果正常的检查在RDW方面进行比较。两组匹配良好。DVT组的RDW(%)水平中位数及四分位数间距(第25和第75百分位数)[14.9(14.2 - 16.7)]高于对照组[14.4(13.6 - 15.2);P < 0.001]。根据RDW将患者分为三分位数。最低三分位数中有42例患者(31.6%)检测到DVT,中间三分位数中有81例(53.3%),最高三分位数中有93例(63.7%)(P < 0.001)。在对混杂变量进行校正后的多因素分析中,RDW是预测DVT存在的唯一参数[比值比(OR)1.37;95%置信区间(CI)1.21 - 1.55;P < 0.001]。排除慢性DVT患者后,DVT组的RDW(%)水平四分位数间距(第25和第75百分位数)[15.0(14.2 - 16.7)]也高于对照组[14.4(13.6 - 15.2);P < 0.001]。此外,在近端DVT中,差异仍然显著,尽管在远端DVT中这种显著性消失了[14.4%(13.6 - 15.2)对16.1%(15.1 - 17.4),P < 0.001;14.4%(13.6 - 15.2)对14.3%(14.2 - 14.7),P = 0.959]。在多因素分析中,RDW是近端DVT风险的独立预测因素(OR 1.60;95% CI 1.39 - 1.84;P < 0.0