• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

我们通过实施机器人直肠切除术获得了什么?对64例连续接受腹腔镜或机器人低位前切除术治疗直肠腺癌的患者进行评估。

What have we gained by performing robotic rectal resection? Evaluation of 64 consecutive patients who underwent laparoscopic or robotic low anterior resection for rectal adenocarcinoma.

作者信息

Erguner Ilknur, Aytac Erman, Boler Deniz Eren, Atalar Banu, Baca Bilgi, Karahasanoglu Tayfun, Hamzaoglu Ismail, Uras Cihan

机构信息

Department of Surgery, Acibadem University School of Medicine, Istanbul, Turkey.

出版信息

Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech. 2013 Jun;23(3):316-9. doi: 10.1097/SLE.0b013e31828e3697.

DOI:10.1097/SLE.0b013e31828e3697
PMID:23752000
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Robotic surgery is thought to be a solution to overcome the limitations of laparoscopy in sphincter-saving resections. In this study, we present our results on patients undergoing robotic and laparoscopic low anterior resection (LAR) consecutively for rectal adenocarcinoma.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Between February 2008 and June 2011, consecutive patients who underwent laparoscopic or robotic LAR by a single surgical team for rectal cancer were evaluated. The patients' demographic, operative, postoperative short-term follow-up, and histopathologic data were analyzed.

RESULTS

Twenty-seven patients underwent robotic LAR, whereas 37 patients underwent laparoscopic LAR. The operation time of the laparoscopy group was significantly shorter than that of the robotic group (P=0.02). The complete total mesorectal excision rate was significantly higher in the robotic group (P=0.02). The overall complication rates were 11.11% and 21.62% in the robotic and laparoscopy groups, respectively (P=0.45).

CONCLUSIONS

Good quality of resected specimens could be achieved with robotic LAR. Further prospective studies including long-term oncologic outcomes and costs with higher patient number are definitely needed to assess the benefits of robotic resection in rectal cancer treatment.

摘要

背景

机器人手术被认为是克服腹腔镜保肛切除术局限性的一种解决方案。在本研究中,我们展示了连续接受机器人辅助和腹腔镜低位前切除术(LAR)治疗直肠腺癌患者的结果。

材料与方法

对2008年2月至2011年6月期间由同一手术团队连续接受腹腔镜或机器人辅助LAR治疗直肠癌的患者进行评估。分析患者的人口统计学、手术、术后短期随访及组织病理学数据。

结果

27例患者接受机器人辅助LAR,37例患者接受腹腔镜LAR。腹腔镜组的手术时间显著短于机器人组(P = 0.02)。机器人组的完整直肠系膜全切除率显著更高(P = 0.02)。机器人组和腹腔镜组的总体并发症发生率分别为11.11%和21.62%(P = 0.45)。

结论

机器人辅助LAR可获得高质量的切除标本。绝对需要进一步开展前瞻性研究,纳入更多患者,包括长期肿瘤学结局和成本,以评估机器人切除术在直肠癌治疗中的益处。

相似文献

1
What have we gained by performing robotic rectal resection? Evaluation of 64 consecutive patients who underwent laparoscopic or robotic low anterior resection for rectal adenocarcinoma.我们通过实施机器人直肠切除术获得了什么?对64例连续接受腹腔镜或机器人低位前切除术治疗直肠腺癌的患者进行评估。
Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech. 2013 Jun;23(3):316-9. doi: 10.1097/SLE.0b013e31828e3697.
2
Results of laparoscopic anterior resection for rectal adenocarcinoma: retrospective analysis of 157 cases.直肠腺癌腹腔镜前切除术的结果:157例回顾性分析
Am J Surg. 2008 Feb;195(2):233-8. doi: 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2007.02.020.
3
Long-term oncologic outcomes of robotic low anterior resection for rectal cancer: a comparative study with laparoscopic surgery.机器人辅助直肠癌低位前切除术的长期肿瘤学结局:与腹腔镜手术的比较研究
Ann Surg. 2015 Jan;261(1):129-37. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000000613.
4
Multicentre study of robotic intersphincteric resection for low rectal cancer.机器人经肛门内括约肌间切除术治疗低位直肠癌的多中心研究。
Br J Surg. 2015 Nov;102(12):1567-73. doi: 10.1002/bjs.9914. Epub 2015 Aug 27.
5
Robotic coloanal anastomosis with or without intersphincteric resection for low rectal cancer: starting with the perianal approach followed by robotic procedure.经肛门入路机器人辅助吻合术联合或不联合经肛门内外括约肌间切除术治疗低位直肠癌:先经肛门入路,再行机器人手术。
Ann Surg Oncol. 2012 Jan;19(1):154-5. doi: 10.1245/s10434-011-1952-4. Epub 2011 Aug 6.
6
Robotic surgery for rectal cancer: a single center experience of 100 consecutive cases.直肠癌的机器人手术:连续100例的单中心经验
Chirurgia (Bucur). 2013 Mar-Apr;108(2):143-51.
7
Laparoscopic surgery in rectal cancer: a prospective analysis of patient survival and outcomes.直肠癌的腹腔镜手术:患者生存率和结局的前瞻性分析。
Dis Colon Rectum. 2007 Dec;50(12):2047-53. doi: 10.1007/s10350-007-9055-9. Epub 2007 Sep 29.
8
Robotic versus laparoscopic intersphincteric resection for low rectal cancer: comparison of the operative, oncological, and functional outcomes.机器人辅助与腹腔镜下低位直肠癌括约肌间切除术:手术、肿瘤学及功能结局的比较
Ann Surg Oncol. 2015 Apr;22(4):1219-25. doi: 10.1245/s10434-014-4177-5. Epub 2014 Oct 18.
9
Robotic versus open total mesorectal excision for rectal cancer: comparative study of short and long-term outcomes.机器人辅助与开放全直肠系膜切除术治疗直肠癌:短期和长期结果的比较研究
Eur J Surg Oncol. 2014 Sep;40(9):1072-9. doi: 10.1016/j.ejso.2014.02.235. Epub 2014 Feb 26.
10
Robotic Resection is a Good Prognostic Factor in Rectal Cancer Compared with Laparoscopic Resection: Long-term Survival Analysis Using Propensity Score Matching.与腹腔镜切除术相比,机器人切除术是直肠癌的一个良好预后因素:使用倾向评分匹配的长期生存分析
Dis Colon Rectum. 2017 Mar;60(3):266-273. doi: 10.1097/DCR.0000000000000770.

引用本文的文献

1
Proficient surgeons enhance conversion rates and sphincter preservation in robotic rectal cancer surgery with comparable long-term outcomes: a comparative study with laparoscopy in a large-volume center in China.熟练的外科医生在机器人直肠癌手术中提高了中转率和括约肌保留率,且长期结果相当:在中国一个大容量中心与腹腔镜手术的比较研究。
BMC Cancer. 2025 Mar 26;25(1):545. doi: 10.1186/s12885-024-13407-y.
2
Comparison of Non-Oncological Postoperative Outcomes Following Robotic and Laparoscopic Colorectal Resection for Colorectal Malignancy: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.机器人手术与腹腔镜手术治疗结直肠癌的非肿瘤学术后结局比较:一项系统评价与荟萃分析
Cureus. 2022 Jul 19;14(7):e27015. doi: 10.7759/cureus.27015. eCollection 2022 Jul.
3
Difference in surgical outcomes of rectal cancer by study design: meta-analyses of randomized clinical trials, case-matched studies, and cohort studies.研究设计对直肠癌手术结果的影响差异:随机临床试验、病例匹配研究和队列研究的荟萃分析。
BJS Open. 2021 Mar 5;5(2). doi: 10.1093/bjsopen/zraa067.
4
Robotic Versus Conventional Laparoscopic Surgery for Colorectal Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis with Trial Sequential Analysis.机器人手术与传统腹腔镜手术治疗结直肠癌:一项采用序贯试验分析的系统评价和Meta分析
World J Surg. 2019 Apr;43(4):1146-1161. doi: 10.1007/s00268-018-04896-7.
5
Totally robotic complete mesocolic excision for right-sided colon cancer.全机器人完整结肠系膜切除术治疗右侧结肠癌。
J Robot Surg. 2019 Feb;13(1):107-114. doi: 10.1007/s11701-018-0817-2. Epub 2018 May 17.
6
Transanal Endoscopic and Transabdominal Robotic Total Mesorectal Excision for Mid-to-Low Rectal Cancer: Comparison of Short-term Postoperative and Oncologic Outcomes by Using a Case-Matched Analysis.经肛门内镜与经腹机器人全直肠系膜切除术治疗中低位直肠癌:采用病例匹配分析比较术后短期及肿瘤学结局
Ann Coloproctol. 2018 Feb;34(1):29-35. doi: 10.3393/ac.2018.34.1.29. Epub 2018 Feb 28.
7
Robot-assisted versus conventional laparoscopic operation in anus-preserving rectal cancer: a meta-analysis.机器人辅助与传统腹腔镜手术治疗保留肛门直肠癌的Meta分析
Ther Clin Risk Manag. 2017 Sep 22;13:1247-1257. doi: 10.2147/TCRM.S142758. eCollection 2017.
8
Robotic versus laparoscopic surgery for rectal cancer: a comparative study of clinical outcomes and costs.机器人手术与腹腔镜手术治疗直肠癌:临床结局和成本的比较研究
Int J Colorectal Dis. 2017 Oct;32(10):1423-1429. doi: 10.1007/s00384-017-2876-7. Epub 2017 Aug 8.
9
Critical analysis of the literature investigating urogenital function preservation following robotic rectal cancer surgery.对机器人直肠癌手术后泌尿生殖功能保留相关文献的批判性分析。
World J Gastrointest Surg. 2016 Nov 27;8(11):744-754. doi: 10.4240/wjgs.v8.i11.744.
10
Robotic rectal surgery: State of the art.机器人直肠手术:当前技术水平
World J Gastrointest Oncol. 2016 Nov 15;8(11):757-771. doi: 10.4251/wjgo.v8.i11.757.