University of Pennsylvania.
Milbank Q. 2013 Jun;91(2):288-315. doi: 10.1111/milq.12014.
Adults aged sixty-five and over account for a large fraction of all surgeries performed in the United States each year. While historical growth in rates of surgery in this population is commonly attributed to financial incentives and technological innovations, the shifts in thought that underpinned the spread of surgery among the U.S. elderly remain largely unexplored. We examined changing perspectives on aging over time in American surgery through two case studies: the expansion of general surgical procedures among older U.S. adults between 1945 and 1965, and the spread of coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) among the U.S. elderly between 1975 and 1995.
For this article, we used close readings of historical journal articles, textbook excerpts, survey reports, and government documents related to surgery and aging.
Similar perspectives on aging informed the spread of both general surgical procedures among older adults after World War II and CABG in the elderly from the mid-1970s onward. In each case, surgeons argued against earlier views that surgery was contraindicated in old age using rhetoric that negated the relevance of age to medical decisions. Furthermore, surgeons elevated other types of information-such as the presence or absence of chronic diseases-to supplant age as an explanation for the high operative mortality rates seen among older patients. By stressing the modifiability of operative risk in the elderly, surgeons' arguments positioned old age itself as a new surgical "frontier."
Surgeons' arguments for the expansion of surgery among the U.S. elderly over time worked to negate the relevance of age to medical decisions and to portray the wider use of surgery in the elderly as uniformly beneficial. While potentially promoting broader access to surgical care, such perspectives may also have contributed to ongoing health policy challenges by normalizing surgery at any stage in the life-course, with implications for current patterns of surgical utilization and medical spending.
在美国,每年进行的所有手术中,65 岁及以上的成年人占很大比例。虽然这一人群中手术率的历史增长通常归因于经济激励和技术创新,但支撑美国老年人中手术普及的思维转变在很大程度上仍未得到探索。我们通过两个案例研究来考察美国外科手术中随时间推移对老龄化观念的变化:1945 年至 1965 年间美国老年人中普通外科手术的扩大,以及 1975 年至 1995 年间美国老年人中冠状动脉旁路移植术(CABG)的普及。
本文采用了对与外科和老龄化相关的历史期刊文章、教科书节选、调查报告和政府文件的深入阅读。
相似的老龄化观念推动了二战后普通外科手术在老年人中的普及,以及 20 世纪 70 年代中期以来 CABG 在老年人中的普及。在每种情况下,外科医生都用否定年龄对医疗决策的相关性的言论来反驳先前认为手术在老年时禁忌的观点。此外,外科医生还提升了其他类型的信息,如慢性病的存在与否,以取代年龄作为解释老年患者高手术死亡率的原因。通过强调老年患者手术风险的可改变性,外科医生的论点将老年本身定位为一个新的外科“前沿”。
随着时间的推移,外科医生为扩大美国老年人手术范围的论点努力否定了年龄对医疗决策的相关性,并将老年人中更广泛使用手术描绘为普遍有益。虽然这可能促进了更广泛地获得手术护理,但这种观点也可能通过将手术规范化到生命过程的任何阶段,对当前的手术利用和医疗支出模式产生影响,从而对持续的健康政策挑战做出贡献。