文献检索文档翻译深度研究
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
邀请有礼套餐&价格历史记录

新学期,新优惠

限时优惠:9月1日-9月22日

30天高级会员仅需29元

1天体验卡首发特惠仅需5.99元

了解详情
不再提醒
插件&应用
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
高级版
套餐订阅购买积分包
AI 工具
文献检索文档翻译深度研究
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2025

班夫国家公园野生动物通道结构中熊种群的人口连通性。

Demographic connectivity for ursid populations at wildlife crossing structures in Banff National Park.

机构信息

Western Transportation Institute and Department of Ecology, Montana State University, Bozeman, MT 59717, USA.

出版信息

Conserv Biol. 2013 Aug;27(4):721-30. doi: 10.1111/cobi.12075. Epub 2013 Jun 12.


DOI:10.1111/cobi.12075
PMID:23758532
Abstract

Wildlife crossing structures are one solution to mitigating the fragmentation of wildlife populations caused by roads, but their effectiveness in providing connectivity has only been superficially evaluated. Hundreds of grizzly (Ursus arctos) and black bear (Ursus americanus) passages through under and overpasses have been recorded in Banff National Park, Alberta, Canada. However, the ability of crossing structures to allow individual and population-level movements across road networks remains unknown. In April 2006, we initiated a 3-year investigation into whether crossing structures provide demographic connectivity for grizzly and black bears in Banff National Park. We collected hair with multiple noninvasive methods to obtain genetic samples from grizzly and black bears around the Bow Valley. Our objectives were to determine the number of male and female grizzly and black bears that use crossing structures; examine spatial and temporal patterns of crossings; and estimate the proportions of grizzly and black bear populations in the Bow Valley that use crossing structures. Fifteen grizzly (7 female, 8 male) and 17 black bears (8 female, 9 male) used wildlife crossing structures. The number of individuals detected at wildlife crossing structures was highly correlated with the number of passages in space and time. Grizzly bears used open crossing structures (e.g., overpasses) more often than constricted crossings (e.g., culverts). Peak use of crossing structures for both bear species occurred in July, when high rates of foraging activity coincide with mating season. We compared the number of bears that used crossings with estimates of population abundance from a related study and determined that substantial percentages of grizzly (15.0% in 2006, 19.8% in 2008) and black bear (17.6% in 2006, 11.0% in 2008) populations used crossing structures. On the basis of our results, we concluded wildlife crossing structures provide demographic connectivity for bear populations in Banff National Park.

摘要

野生动物穿越结构是缓解道路导致野生动物种群破碎化的一种解决方案,但它们在提供连通性方面的有效性只是表面上的评估。在加拿大艾伯塔省班夫国家公园,已经记录了数百只灰熊(Ursus arctos)和黑熊(Ursus americanus)通过地下通道和天桥的穿越。然而,穿越结构是否能够允许个体和种群水平在道路网络上进行移动仍然未知。2006 年 4 月,我们开始了一项为期 3 年的研究,以确定穿越结构是否为班夫国家公园的灰熊和黑熊提供了种群连通性。我们使用多种非侵入性方法收集毛发,以获取 Bow 谷周围灰熊和黑熊的遗传样本。我们的目标是确定使用穿越结构的雄性和雌性灰熊和黑熊的数量;检查穿越的时空模式;并估计使用穿越结构的 Bow 谷灰熊和黑熊种群的比例。有 15 只灰熊(7 只雌性,8 只雄性)和 17 只黑熊(8 只雌性,9 只雄性)使用了野生动物穿越结构。在野生动物穿越结构中检测到的个体数量与空间和时间上的穿越次数高度相关。灰熊比狭窄的穿越(例如涵洞)更频繁地使用开放的穿越结构(例如天桥)。两种熊类使用穿越结构的高峰期都出现在 7 月,此时觅食活动的高频率与交配季节相吻合。我们将使用穿越结构的熊的数量与相关研究中种群丰度的估计值进行了比较,并确定了大量的灰熊(2006 年为 15.0%,2008 年为 19.8%)和黑熊(2006 年为 17.6%,2008 年为 11.0%)种群使用了穿越结构。根据我们的结果,我们得出结论,野生动物穿越结构为班夫国家公园的熊种群提供了种群连通性。

相似文献

[1]
Demographic connectivity for ursid populations at wildlife crossing structures in Banff National Park.

Conserv Biol. 2013-6-12

[2]
Genetic connectivity for two bear species at wildlife crossing structures in Banff National Park.

Proc Biol Sci. 2014-2-19

[3]
Estimating grizzly and black bear population abundance and trend in Banff National Park using noninvasive genetic sampling.

PLoS One. 2012-5-2

[4]
Spatial patterns of breeding success of grizzly bears derived from hierarchical multistate models.

Conserv Biol. 2014-10

[5]
Grizzly Bear Noninvasive Genetic Tagging Surveys: Estimating the Magnitude of Missed Detections.

PLoS One. 2016-9-7

[6]
Seasonal and individual variation in the use of rail-associated food attractants by grizzly bears (Ursus arctos) in a national park.

PLoS One. 2017-5-24

[7]
Grizzly bear response to fine spatial and temporal scale spring snow cover in Western Alberta.

PLoS One. 2019-4-10

[8]
Evaluating density-weighted connectivity of black bears (Ursus americanus) in Glacier National Park with spatial capture-recapture models.

Mov Ecol. 2024-1-23

[9]
Prevalence of Trichinella spp. in black bears, grizzly bears, and wolves in the Dehcho Region, Northwest Territories, Canada, including the first report of T. nativa in a grizzly bear from Canada.

J Wildl Dis. 2011-7

[10]
First report of Taenia arctos (Cestoda: Taeniidae) from grizzly (Ursus arctos horribilis) and black bears (Ursus americanus) in North America.

Parasitol Int. 2014-4

引用本文的文献

[1]
Assessing the connectivity value of roadway structures for terrestrial mammals across the Northern Appalachian forest of Vermont.

PLoS One. 2025-9-4

[2]
Wildlife overpass structure size, distribution, effectiveness, and adherence to expert design recommendations.

PeerJ. 2022

[3]
Supplementing Environmental Assessments with Cumulative Effects Scenario Modeling for Grizzly Bear Connectivity in the Bow Valley, Alberta, Canada.

Environ Manage. 2022-12

[4]
Modeling connectivity to identify current and future anthropogenic barriers to movement of large carnivores: A case study in the American Southwest.

Ecol Evol. 2017-4-18

[5]
A Comparison of Grizzly Bear Demographic Parameters Estimated from Non-Spatial and Spatial Open Population Capture-Recapture Models.

PLoS One. 2015-7-31

[6]
Stable isotopes reveal rail-associated behavior in a threatened carnivore.

Isotopes Environ Health Stud. 2014

[7]
Genetic connectivity for two bear species at wildlife crossing structures in Banff National Park.

Proc Biol Sci. 2014-2-19

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

推荐工具

医学文档翻译智能文献检索