Ylmaz Kahraman Berkhan, Gurunluoglu Raffi, Bayramiçli Mehmet
From the *Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, Acibadem University, Istanbul, Turkey; †Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Denver Health Medical Center, University of Colorado Health Sciences Center, Denver, CO; and ‡Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, Marmara University, Istanbul, Turkey.
Ann Plast Surg. 2014 Oct;73(4):434-40. doi: 10.1097/SAP.0b013e31827fb346.
We conducted an experimental study to investigate if it would be possible to re-elevate a flap at a standard flap site if its vascular pedicle was mutilated previously and there was a preexisting scar formation at the pedicle site.
Thirty-five male Sprague-Dawley rats were divided into 3 groups. In the control group (n = 5), animals received a procedure in which unilateral axial pattern abdominal flap was elevated, and then sutured to its original place. The remaining 2 groups underwent 2-stage procedures. In the first stage, scar tissue was created with either a skin incision (group 2, n = 15) or excision (group 3, n = 15) at the prospective pedicle site of the abdominal flap. In the second stage, abdominal flap was raised in 5 rats as a scar-pedicled flap at day 7, day 21, and day 42. Flaps were sutured in their places. Seven days later, flap survival was evaluated.
Control flaps had complete survival (day 7, 95.5%; day 21, 94.8%; and day 42, 94.5%). Group 2 and group 3 flaps raised on day 7 (group 2, 65.4%; group 3, 63.9%) and on day 21 (group 2, 65.7%; group 3, 66.7%) showed decreased survival compared to control group flaps (P < 0.05). On day 42, group 1 flaps had better survival when compared to group 2 flaps (82.6% vs 70.0%, P < 0.05). Group 1 flaps showed progressive vascular network formation as evidenced by contrast medium first in the proximal two thirds of the flaps on day 7, and later via visualization of the axial pattern vascular tree on day 42. In group 3, approximately half of the flap was filled with barium contrast and no single pedicle was identified on day 42.
Preexisting scar tissue and pedicle division in the pedicle site of a standard flap diminished dimensions of surviving flap when compared to control flaps. Incision-scar-pedicled flaps achieved better survival compared to excision-group flaps, particularly in the late postoperative period. The study findings showed that it may be possible to raise a flap from previously mutilated site secondary to scar formation and pedicle injury.
我们进行了一项实验研究,以探讨如果标准皮瓣部位的血管蒂先前已被切断且蒂部存在瘢痕形成,是否有可能再次掀起该皮瓣。
35只雄性Sprague-Dawley大鼠被分为3组。对照组(n = 5)的动物接受单侧轴型腹部皮瓣掀起手术,然后缝合回原位。其余2组接受两阶段手术。在第一阶段,通过在腹部皮瓣预期的蒂部位置进行皮肤切口(第2组,n = 15)或切除(第3组,n = 15)来形成瘢痕组织。在第二阶段,分别于第7天、第21天和第42天在5只大鼠中掀起腹部皮瓣作为瘢痕蒂皮瓣。皮瓣缝合回原位。7天后,评估皮瓣存活情况。
对照组皮瓣完全存活(第7天,95.5%;第21天,94.8%;第42天,94.5%)。与对照组皮瓣相比,第2组和第3组在第7天(第2组,65.4%;第3组,63.9%)和第21天(第2组,65.7%;第3组,66.7%)掀起的皮瓣存活情况下降(P < 0.05)。在第42天,第1组皮瓣与第2组皮瓣相比存活情况更好(82.6%对70.0%,P < 0.05)。第1组皮瓣显示出逐渐形成的血管网络,第7天造影剂首先在皮瓣近端三分之二处显示,第42天可见轴型血管树。在第3组,约一半的皮瓣充满钡剂造影剂,第42天未发现单一的蒂。
与对照组皮瓣相比,标准皮瓣蒂部预先存在的瘢痕组织和蒂部切断会减小存活皮瓣的尺寸。与切除组皮瓣相比,切口瘢痕蒂皮瓣存活情况更好,尤其是在术后晚期。研究结果表明,继发于瘢痕形成和蒂部损伤的先前受损部位有可能掀起皮瓣。