• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Test blueprints for psychiatry residency in-training written examinations in Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.沙特阿拉伯利雅得精神病学住院医师在职考试的测试蓝图。
Adv Med Educ Pract. 2012 May 24;3:31-46. doi: 10.2147/AMEP.S31045. Print 2012.
2
Blueprinting in assessment: A tool to increase the validity of undergraduate written examinations in pathology.评估中的蓝图设计:提高病理学本科笔试有效性的一种工具。
Int J Appl Basic Med Res. 2015 Aug;5(Suppl 1):S76-9. doi: 10.4103/2229-516X.162286.
3
Evaluation of the orthopedic residency training program in Saudi Arabia and comparison with a selected Canadian residency program.沙特阿拉伯骨科住院医师培训项目评估及与选定的加拿大住院医师培训项目比较。
Adv Med Educ Pract. 2014 Sep 19;5:315-21. doi: 10.2147/AMEP.S69217. eCollection 2014.
4
"What do Ayurveda Postgraduate Entrance Examinations actually assess?" - Results of a five-year period question-paper analysis based on Bloom's taxonomy.“阿育吠陀研究生入学考试究竟评估什么?”——基于布鲁姆分类法的五年期试卷分析结果
J Ayurveda Integr Med. 2016 Jul-Sep;7(3):167-172. doi: 10.1016/j.jaim.2016.06.005. Epub 2016 Sep 13.
5
Evaluation of Cognitive levels and Item writing flaws in Medical Pharmacology Internal Assessment Examinations.医学药理学内部评估考试中认知水平及试题编写缺陷的评估
Pak J Med Sci. 2017 Jul-Aug;33(4):866-870. doi: 10.12669/pjms.334.12887.
6
Blueprinting of summative theory assessment of undergraduate medical students in microbiology.本科医学生微生物学总结性理论评估的蓝图设计
Med J Armed Forces India. 2020 Apr;76(2):207-212. doi: 10.1016/j.mjafi.2018.12.012. Epub 2019 Mar 29.
7
Rapid Blueprinting: An Efficient Method for Designing Content of Assessments.快速蓝图绘制:一种设计评估内容的有效方法。
Med Sci Educ. 2024 Feb 28;34(2):471-475. doi: 10.1007/s40670-024-02006-y. eCollection 2024 Apr.
8
The cognitive context of examinations in psychiatry using Bloom's taxonomy.运用布鲁姆分类法对精神病学考试的认知情境分析
Med Educ. 1991 Nov;25(6):480-4. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2923.1991.tb00101.x.
9
Learning environment of the Saudi psychiatry board training program.沙特精神病学委员会培训项目的学习环境。
Saudi Med J. 2017 Jun;38(6):629-635. doi: 10.15537/smj.2017.6.18164.
10
Analysis of Physiology Theory Question Papers for Competency-Based Medical Education Implementation in Gujarat: A Pilot Study.古吉拉特邦基于胜任力医学教育实施的生理学理论试卷分析:一项试点研究
Cureus. 2024 Jul 29;16(7):e65642. doi: 10.7759/cureus.65642. eCollection 2024 Jul.

本文引用的文献

1
A comparison of formal consensus methods used for developing clinical guidelines.用于制定临床指南的正式共识方法比较。
J Health Serv Res Policy. 2006 Oct;11(4):218-24. doi: 10.1258/135581906778476553.
2
The criteria and analysis of good multiple choice questions in a health professional setting.健康专业背景下优质多项选择题的标准与分析
Saudi Med J. 2005 Oct;26(10):1505-10.
3
Using a modified nominal group technique as a curriculum evaluation tool.使用改良的名词组技术作为课程评估工具。
Fam Med. 2004 Jun;36(6):402-6.
4
Measurement practices: methods for developing content-valid student examinations.测量实践:开发具有内容效度的学生考试的方法。
Med Teach. 2003 Jul;25(4):414-21. doi: 10.1080/0142159031000100337.
5
Evaluating assessment: the missing link?评估评估:缺失的环节?
Med Educ. 1999 Apr;33(4):276-81. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2923.1999.00405.x.
6
Analysing clinical practice guidelines. A method of documentary analysis.
J Adv Nurs. 1997 May;25(5):1008-17. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2648.1997.19970251008.x.
7
Training directors' opinions about the psychiatry resident in-training examination (PRITE).培训主任对精神病学住院医师培训考试(PRITE)的看法。
Am J Psychiatry. 1992 Apr;149(4):521-4. doi: 10.1176/ajp.149.4.521.
8
How did you guess? Or, what do multiple-choice questions measure?你是怎么猜到的?或者说,多项选择题衡量的是什么?
Med J Aust. 1976 Jun 5;1(23):884-6.

沙特阿拉伯利雅得精神病学住院医师在职考试的测试蓝图。

Test blueprints for psychiatry residency in-training written examinations in Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.

作者信息

Gaffas Eisha M, Sequeira Reginald P, Namla Riyadh A Al, Al-Harbi Khalid S

机构信息

Al-Amal Complex for Mental Health, Riyadh, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia.

出版信息

Adv Med Educ Pract. 2012 May 24;3:31-46. doi: 10.2147/AMEP.S31045. Print 2012.

DOI:10.2147/AMEP.S31045
PMID:23762000
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3650869/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

The postgraduate training program in psychiatry in Saudi Arabia, which was established in 1997, is a 4-year residency program. Written exams comprising of multiple choice questions (MCQs) are used as a summative assessment of residents in order to determine their eligibility for promotion from one year to the next. Test blueprints are not used in preparing examinations.

OBJECTIVE

To develop test blueprints for the written examinations used in the psychiatry residency program.

METHODS

Based on the guidelines of four professional bodies, documentary analysis was used to develop global and detailed test blueprints for each year of the residency program. An expert panel participated during piloting and final modification of the test blueprints. Their opinion about the content, weightage for each content domain, and proportion of test items to be sampled in each cognitive category as defined by modified Bloom's taxonomy were elicited.

RESULTS

Eight global and detailed test blueprints, two for each year of the psychiatry residency program, were developed. The global test blueprints were reviewed by experts and piloted. Six experts participated in the final modification of test blueprints. Based on expert consensus, the content, total weightage for each content domain, and proportion of test items to be included in each cognitive category were determined for each global test blueprint. Experts also suggested progressively decreasing the weightage for recall test items and increasing problem solving test items in examinations, from year 1 to year 4 of the psychiatry residence program.

CONCLUSION

A systematic approach using a documentary and content analysis technique was used to develop test blueprints with additional input from an expert panel as appropriate. Test blueprinting is an important step to ensure the test validity in all residency programs.

摘要

背景

沙特阿拉伯的精神病学研究生培训项目于1997年设立,为期4年。由多项选择题(MCQ)组成的笔试用作住院医师的总结性评估,以确定他们是否有资格从一年晋升到下一年。编制考试时未使用测试蓝图。

目的

为精神病学住院医师培训项目中使用的笔试编制测试蓝图。

方法

根据四个专业机构的指导方针,采用文献分析为住院医师培训项目的每一年编制总体和详细的测试蓝图。一个专家小组参与了测试蓝图的试点和最终修改。征求了他们对内容、每个内容领域的权重以及根据修订后的布鲁姆分类法定义的每个认知类别中要抽取的测试项目比例的意见。

结果

编制了八个总体和详细的测试蓝图,精神病学住院医师培训项目的每年各两个。总体测试蓝图由专家进行了评审和试点。六名专家参与了测试蓝图的最终修改。根据专家共识,为每个总体测试蓝图确定了内容、每个内容领域的总权重以及每个认知类别中要包含的测试项目比例。专家们还建议,在精神病学住院医师培训项目的第1年到第4年期间,逐步降低回忆性测试项目的权重,增加考试中解决问题的测试项目。

结论

采用文献和内容分析技术的系统方法编制测试蓝图,并在适当的时候额外征求专家小组的意见。测试蓝图编制是确保所有住院医师培训项目测试有效性的重要一步。