• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

你是怎么猜到的?或者说,多项选择题衡量的是什么?

How did you guess? Or, what do multiple-choice questions measure?

作者信息

Cox K R

出版信息

Med J Aust. 1976 Jun 5;1(23):884-6.

PMID:967086
Abstract

Multiple-choice questions classified as requiring problem-solving skills have been interpreted as measuring problem-solving skills within students, with the implicit hypothesis that questions needing an increasingly complex intellectual process should present increasing difficulty to the student. This hypothesis was tested in a 150-question paper taken by 721 students in seven Australian medical schools. No correlation was observed between difficulty and assigned process. Consequently, the question-answering process was explored with a group of final-year students. Anecdotal recall by students gave heavy weight to knowledge rather than problem solving in answering these questions. Assignment of the 150 questions to the classification by three teachers and six students showed their congruence to be a little above random probability.

摘要

被归类为需要解决问题能力的多项选择题,被解读为是在衡量学生的解决问题能力,其隐含的假设是,需要越来越复杂智力过程的问题,应该会给学生带来越来越大的难度。这一假设在一份由澳大利亚七所医学院的721名学生作答的包含150道题的试卷中得到了检验。未观察到难度与指定的智力过程之间存在相关性。因此,对一组即将毕业的学生的答题过程进行了探究。学生们的轶事性回忆表明,在回答这些问题时,他们非常倚重知识而非解决问题的能力。由三位教师和六名学生将这150道题进行分类,结果显示他们分类的一致性略高于随机概率。

相似文献

1
How did you guess? Or, what do multiple-choice questions measure?你是怎么猜到的?或者说,多项选择题衡量的是什么?
Med J Aust. 1976 Jun 5;1(23):884-6.
2
Comparison of performance of final-year students from three Australian medical schools.澳大利亚三所医学院校最后一年学生的表现比较。
Med J Aust. 1987 Oct 19;147(8):385-8.
3
Comparison between Long-Menu and Open-Ended Questions in computerized medical assessments. A randomized controlled trial.计算机化医学评估中长菜单式问题与开放式问题的比较:一项随机对照试验。
BMC Med Educ. 2006 Oct 10;6:50. doi: 10.1186/1472-6920-6-50.
4
Learning in medical school: an approach to student responsibility.医学院校的学习:培养学生责任感的方法。
Surgery. 1972 May;71(5):645-9.
5
Teaching baroreflex physiology to medical students: a comparison of quiz-based and conventional teaching strategies in a laboratory exercise.向医学生传授压力感受性反射生理学:实验室练习中基于测验与传统教学策略的比较。
Adv Physiol Educ. 2012 Jun;36(2):147-53. doi: 10.1152/advan.00011.2012.
6
Do extended matching multiple-choice questions measure clinical reasoning?扩展匹配多项选择题能衡量临床推理能力吗?
Med Educ. 2005 Apr;39(4):410-7. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2929.2005.02089.x.
7
Peer instruction enhanced student performance on qualitative problem-solving questions.同伴教学提高了学生在定性解决问题类题目上的表现。
Adv Physiol Educ. 2006 Dec;30(4):168-73. doi: 10.1152/advan.00013.2006.
8
Validity of multiple-choice examinations in surgery.外科多选题考试的效度
Surgery. 1984 Jul;96(1):97-101.
9
Do medical students respond empathetically to a virtual patient?医学生对虚拟病人会做出共情反应吗?
Am J Surg. 2007 Jun;193(6):756-60. doi: 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2007.01.021.
10
Answering multiple-choice questions in high-stakes medical examinations.在高风险医学考试中回答多项选择题。
Med Educ. 2005 Sep;39(9):890-4. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2929.2005.02243.x.

引用本文的文献

1
The Generation and Use of Medical MCQs: A Narrative Review.医学多项选择题的生成与应用:一篇叙述性综述
Adv Med Educ Pract. 2025 Aug 5;16:1331-1340. doi: 10.2147/AMEP.S513119. eCollection 2025.
2
Test blueprints for psychiatry residency in-training written examinations in Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.沙特阿拉伯利雅得精神病学住院医师在职考试的测试蓝图。
Adv Med Educ Pract. 2012 May 24;3:31-46. doi: 10.2147/AMEP.S31045. Print 2012.
3
Academic commentary faculty development: some thoughts about the process and content.学术评论员的师资发展:对过程和内容的一些思考。
Can Fam Physician. 1979 May;25:631-4.