Manns Patricia J, Darrah Johanna
Department of Physical Therapy, Faculty of Rehabilitation Medicine, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Canada.
Adv Med Educ Pract. 2012 Nov 27;3:113-9. doi: 10.2147/AMEP.S37510. Print 2012.
Scenarios are used as the basis from which to evaluate the use of the components of evidence-based practice in decision making, yet there are few examples of a standardized process of scenario writing. The aim of this paper is to describe a step-by-step scenario writing method used in the context of the authors' curriculum research study.
Scenario writing teams included one physical therapy clinician and one academic staff member. There were four steps in the scenario development process: (1) identify prevalent condition and brainstorm interventions; (2) literature search; (3) develop scenario framework; and (4) write scenario.
Scenarios focused only on interventions, not diagnostic or prognostic problems. The process led to two types of scenarios - ones that provided an intervention with strong research evidence and others where the intervention had weak evidence to support its use. The end product of the process was a scenario that incorporates aspects of evidence-based decision making and can be used as the basis for evaluation.
The use of scenarios has been very helpful to capture therapists' reasoning processes. The scenario development process was applied in an education context as part of a final evaluation of graduating clinical physical therapy students.
案例被用作评估循证实践各要素在决策中应用情况的基础,但标准化案例编写流程的示例却很少。本文旨在描述作者在课程研究中所使用的逐步案例编写方法。
案例编写团队由一名物理治疗临床医生和一名学术人员组成。案例开发过程包括四个步骤:(1)确定常见病症并集思广益提出干预措施;(2)文献检索;(3)制定案例框架;(4)编写案例。
案例仅关注干预措施,而非诊断或预后问题。该流程产生了两种类型的案例——一种提供了有充分研究证据支持的干预措施,另一种则是干预措施的证据支持不足。该流程的最终成果是一个包含循证决策要素的案例,可作为评估的基础。
案例的使用对于捕捉治疗师的推理过程非常有帮助。案例开发过程被应用于教育环境中,作为对临床物理治疗专业毕业生的最终评估的一部分。