Centro Cardiologico Monzino, IRCCS, Milan, Italy.
JACC Cardiovasc Imaging. 2013 Jun;6(6):641-50. doi: 10.1016/j.jcmg.2013.01.015.
The aim of the study was to perform a comparison of the prognostic performance of computed tomography coronary angiography (CTA) and exercise electrocardiography (ex-ECG) in patients with suspected coronary artery disease (CAD).
CAD is a major cause of mortality and morbidity, and its management consumes a large proportion of the health care budget. Therefore, identification of patients at high risk of adverse events is crucial. Despite its limited accuracy, ex-ECG is the most commonly used noninvasive test in CAD evaluation. CTA was recently introduced as alternative test.
We enrolled 681 patients (age 61.3 ± 10.4 years, 461 men) with atypical or typical angina and no history of CAD. All patients underwent ex-ECG and CTA and were followed for 44 ±12 months. The endpoints were all cardiac events, defined as nonfatal myocardial infarction, cardiac death, and revascularization, and hard cardiac events, defined as all cardiac events excluding revascularization.
ex-ECG and CTA were rated as positive in 419 (61%) and 274 (40%) of 681 patients, respectively. In univariate analysis, both ex-ECG and CTA were predictors of all cardiac events (hazard ratio [HR]: 2.09, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.5 to 2.8; p < 0.0001 and HR: 21.1, 95% CI: 14.6 to 30.5; p < 0.0001, respectively) and hard cardiac events (HR: 1.9, 95% CI: 1.1 to 3.2; p = 0.02 and HR: 6.8, 95% CI: 3.9 to 11.0; p < 0.0001, respectively), whereas in a multivariate analysis, CAD with ≥50% stenoses detected by CTA was the only independent predictor of hard cardiac events. Stratifying our population by ex-ECG and CTA findings, Kaplan-Meier curves showed that ex-ECG provides only a further risk stratification in the subset of patients with positive findings on CTA and a low to intermediate likelihood of CAD. Moreover, positive findings on CTA identify a shorter event-free period, regardless the ex-ECG findings for both all cardiac events and hard cardiac events, respectively.
CTA may have a higher prognostic value compared with ex-ECG in patients with suspected CAD, mainly in those with a low to intermediate pre-test likelihood of CAD.
本研究旨在比较计算机断层冠状动脉造影(CTA)和运动心电图(ex-ECG)在疑似冠心病(CAD)患者中的预后表现。
CAD 是导致死亡率和发病率的主要原因,其管理消耗了大量的医疗保健预算。因此,识别高危不良事件的患者至关重要。尽管 ex-ECG 的准确性有限,但它仍是 CAD 评估中最常用的非侵入性检查。CTA 最近被引入作为替代检查。
我们纳入了 681 名(年龄 61.3±10.4 岁,461 名男性)有非典型或典型心绞痛且无 CAD 病史的患者。所有患者均接受 ex-ECG 和 CTA 检查,并随访 44±12 个月。终点是所有心脏事件,定义为非致命性心肌梗死、心脏死亡和血运重建,以及硬性心脏事件,定义为除血运重建外的所有心脏事件。
681 例患者中,ex-ECG 和 CTA 分别有 419 例(61%)和 274 例(40%)为阳性。单因素分析显示,ex-ECG 和 CTA 均为所有心脏事件(风险比[HR]:2.09,95%置信区间[CI]:1.5 至 2.8;p<0.0001 和 HR:21.1,95% CI:14.6 至 30.5;p<0.0001)和硬性心脏事件(HR:1.9,95% CI:1.1 至 3.2;p=0.02 和 HR:6.8,95% CI:3.9 至 11.0;p<0.0001)的预测因子,而在多因素分析中,CTA 检测到的≥50%狭窄的 CAD 是硬性心脏事件的唯一独立预测因子。根据 ex-ECG 和 CTA 结果对我们的人群进行分层,Kaplan-Meier 曲线显示,在 CTA 阳性且 CAD 低至中度可能性的患者亚组中,ex-ECG 仅提供进一步的风险分层。此外,无论 ex-ECG 的检查结果如何,CTA 的阳性结果都分别预示着较短的无事件期,适用于所有心脏事件和硬性心脏事件。
与 ex-ECG 相比,CTA 在疑似 CAD 患者中的预后价值可能更高,主要是在 CAD 低至中度预测可能性的患者中。