Silva Esther Pereira da, Lima Roberto Teixeira, Costa Maria José de Carvalho, Batista Filho Malaquias
Centro de Ciências da Saúde, Universidade Federal da Paraíba, João Pessoa, PB, Brazil.
Rev Panam Salud Publica. 2013 May;33(5):356-62. doi: 10.1590/s1020-49892013000500007.
To develop and apply a new instrument to evaluate prenatal care based on the guidelines of the Brazilian Humanization Program for Prenatal Care and Birth, including quantitative and qualitative elements distributed according to the evaluation triad of structure, process, and outcomes.
An analytic, descriptive, quantitative cross-sectional study was carried out with 238 women receiving care in 44 primary care services in the city of João Pessoa, Northeast Brazil, between November 2010 and December 2011. Physicians and nurses involved in prenatal care were also interviewed. The instrument developed by the investigators contains 23 questions relating to structure, process and outcomes of pre-natal care. Based on the information collected, pre-natal care was classified according to an IPR/Pre-Natal index (Índice IPR/Pré-Natal, where I stands for infrastructure, P for work process and R for results). A value of 1 is attributed to each question if it complies with the criteria established for quality, or 2 if it does not comply. The percent of adequate answers in relation to the 23 total questions is used to classify prenatal care as: upper adequate (100% adequate answers); adequate (>75%); intermediate (51 to 74%); and inadequate (<50%). The classification categories for the Pre-Natal/IPR index were compared to those of the Kessner and Adequacy of Prenatal Care Utilization (APNCU) indices.
Questions relating to the work process contributed significantly to the classification of prenatal care as intermediate according to the IPR/Pre-Natal. IPR/Pre-Natal classification categories were consistent to detect prematurity, insufficient weight at birth and absence of exclusive breastfeeding.
The IPR/Pre-Natal index effectively incorporated quantitative and qualitative elements for the assessment of pre-natal care.
根据巴西产前护理与分娩人性化计划指南,开发并应用一种新工具来评估产前护理,该工具包括根据结构、过程和结果的评估三元组分布的定量和定性要素。
2010年11月至2011年12月期间,在巴西东北部若昂佩索阿市的44个初级保健服务机构中,对238名接受护理的妇女进行了一项分析性、描述性、定量横断面研究。还对参与产前护理的医生和护士进行了访谈。研究人员开发的工具包含23个与产前护理的结构、过程和结果相关的问题。根据收集到的信息,产前护理根据IPR/产前指数(IPR/Pré-Natal指数,其中I代表基础设施,P代表工作流程,R代表结果)进行分类。如果每个问题符合既定的质量标准,则赋值为1;如果不符合,则赋值为2。用23个问题中充分回答的百分比将产前护理分类为:高度充分(100%充分回答);充分(>75%);中等(51%至74%);不充分(<50%)。将产前/IPR指数的分类类别与凯斯纳指数和产前护理利用充分性(APNCU)指数的分类类别进行比较。
根据IPR/产前指数,与工作流程相关的问题对产前护理分类为中等有显著贡献。IPR/产前分类类别在检测早产、出生体重不足和无纯母乳喂养方面是一致的。
IPR/产前指数有效地纳入了定量和定性要素,用于评估产前护理。