Koc Gokhan, Yilmaz Yuksel, Un Sitki, Akbay Kaan, Akdeniz Firat
Tepecik Teaching and Research Hospital Urology Department, Yenisehir, Izmir, Turkey.
Can Urol Assoc J. 2013 May-Jun;7(5-6):E329-32. doi: 10.5489/cuaj.12091. Epub 2013 May 13.
We assessed the effect of different voiding positions on uroflowmetric parameters and post-void residual (PVR) urine volume in symptomatic benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH) patients. We also evaluated the effect of alpha blockers on PVR in different voiding positions.
The study was performed with 110 BPH patients over 50 years old. In total, 4 uroflowmetries were performed in all patients: 2 patients in the sitting position and 2 in the standing position. PVR was measured with transabdominal ultrasonography. Also, patients were divided into two groups according to the alpha adrenergic blocker treatment; the effect of this treatment on their uroflowmetric parameters in different positions was evaluated.
MAXIMUM FLOW RATE (QMAX) AND AVERAGE FLOW RATE (QAVE) WERE SIGNIFICANTLY HIGHER IN PATIENTS IN THE SITTING POSITION, BUT THERE WERE NO DIFFERENCES IN OTHER UROFLOWMETRIC PARAMETERS AND PVR VOLUME (QMAX: 15.5±5.9 mL/s vs. 13.7±5.2 mL/s, Qave: 11.4±4.6 mL/s vs. 10.7± 3.9 mL/s, respectively; p < 0.05). The Qmax and Qave were significantly higher in sitting position, compared to the standing position, in both alpha adrenergic treatment and non-treated groups; again, there were no differences in other uroflowmetric parameters and PVR volume.
Qmax and Qave values were significantly higher in the sitting position. Alpha blockers did not affect any change.
我们评估了不同排尿姿势对有症状的良性前列腺增生(BPH)患者尿流率参数和排尿后残余(PVR)尿量的影响。我们还评估了α受体阻滞剂在不同排尿姿势下对PVR的影响。
该研究对110名50岁以上的BPH患者进行。所有患者总共进行了4次尿流率测定:2次在坐位,2次在站位。通过经腹超声测量PVR。此外,根据α肾上腺素能阻滞剂治疗将患者分为两组;评估该治疗对他们在不同姿势下尿流率参数的影响。
坐位患者的最大尿流率(QMAX)和平均尿流率(QAVE)显著更高,但其他尿流率参数和PVR尿量无差异(QMAX:分别为15.5±5.9 mL/s对13.7±5.2 mL/s,Qave:11.4±4.6 mL/s对10.7±3.9 mL/s;p<0.05)。在α肾上腺素能治疗组和未治疗组中,坐位的Qmax和Qave均显著高于站位;同样,其他尿流率参数和PVR尿量无差异。
坐位时Qmax和Qave值显著更高。α受体阻滞剂未影响任何变化。