Suppr超能文献

α受体阻滞剂对不同排尿体位下尿流率参数的影响。

The effect of alpha blockers on uroflowmetric parameters in different voiding positions.

作者信息

Koc Gokhan, Yilmaz Yuksel, Un Sitki, Akbay Kaan, Akdeniz Firat

机构信息

Tepecik Teaching and Research Hospital Urology Department, Yenisehir, Izmir, Turkey.

出版信息

Can Urol Assoc J. 2013 May-Jun;7(5-6):E329-32. doi: 10.5489/cuaj.12091. Epub 2013 May 13.

Abstract

INTRODUCTION

We assessed the effect of different voiding positions on uroflowmetric parameters and post-void residual (PVR) urine volume in symptomatic benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH) patients. We also evaluated the effect of alpha blockers on PVR in different voiding positions.

METHODS

The study was performed with 110 BPH patients over 50 years old. In total, 4 uroflowmetries were performed in all patients: 2 patients in the sitting position and 2 in the standing position. PVR was measured with transabdominal ultrasonography. Also, patients were divided into two groups according to the alpha adrenergic blocker treatment; the effect of this treatment on their uroflowmetric parameters in different positions was evaluated.

RESULTS

MAXIMUM FLOW RATE (QMAX) AND AVERAGE FLOW RATE (QAVE) WERE SIGNIFICANTLY HIGHER IN PATIENTS IN THE SITTING POSITION, BUT THERE WERE NO DIFFERENCES IN OTHER UROFLOWMETRIC PARAMETERS AND PVR VOLUME (QMAX: 15.5±5.9 mL/s vs. 13.7±5.2 mL/s, Qave: 11.4±4.6 mL/s vs. 10.7± 3.9 mL/s, respectively; p < 0.05). The Qmax and Qave were significantly higher in sitting position, compared to the standing position, in both alpha adrenergic treatment and non-treated groups; again, there were no differences in other uroflowmetric parameters and PVR volume.

CONCLUSION

Qmax and Qave values were significantly higher in the sitting position. Alpha blockers did not affect any change.

摘要

引言

我们评估了不同排尿姿势对有症状的良性前列腺增生(BPH)患者尿流率参数和排尿后残余(PVR)尿量的影响。我们还评估了α受体阻滞剂在不同排尿姿势下对PVR的影响。

方法

该研究对110名50岁以上的BPH患者进行。所有患者总共进行了4次尿流率测定:2次在坐位,2次在站位。通过经腹超声测量PVR。此外,根据α肾上腺素能阻滞剂治疗将患者分为两组;评估该治疗对他们在不同姿势下尿流率参数的影响。

结果

坐位患者的最大尿流率(QMAX)和平均尿流率(QAVE)显著更高,但其他尿流率参数和PVR尿量无差异(QMAX:分别为15.5±5.9 mL/s对13.7±5.2 mL/s,Qave:11.4±4.6 mL/s对10.7±3.9 mL/s;p<0.05)。在α肾上腺素能治疗组和未治疗组中,坐位的Qmax和Qave均显著高于站位;同样,其他尿流率参数和PVR尿量无差异。

结论

坐位时Qmax和Qave值显著更高。α受体阻滞剂未影响任何变化。

相似文献

6
Position-related changes in uroflowmetric parameters in healthy young men.
Neurourol Urodyn. 2006;25(3):249-251. doi: 10.1002/nau.20221.

本文引用的文献

4
Does position affect uroflowmetry parameters in women?体位会影响女性尿流率参数吗?
Urol Int. 2008;80(1):37-40. doi: 10.1159/000111727. Epub 2008 Jan 18.
7
Position-related changes in uroflowmetric parameters in healthy young men.
Neurourol Urodyn. 2006;25(3):249-251. doi: 10.1002/nau.20221.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验