Ryu Gun-Chun
Korea Institute for Health and Social Affairs, Seoul, Korea.
J Prev Med Public Health. 2013 May;46(3):127-33. doi: 10.3961/jpmph.2013.46.3.127. Epub 2013 May 31.
This study investigated the German experience in the transition to a unified health care system and suggests the following implications for Korea. First, Germany could have made use of the unification process better if there had been a good road map. Therefore Korea must develop a well prepared road map that considers all possible situations. Second, Germany saw an opportunity for the improvement of the health care system in the early stage of unification but could not take advantage of it because the situation changed dramatically and they had not sufficiently prepared for it. Korea should take into account the opportunity for improvement of the present health care system, such as the roles of public health and traditional medicine. Thirdly, the conditions of North Korea seem to be far worse than those of former East Germany and also worse than even those of other transition countries [corrected].Therefore Korea should design a long-term road map taking as many variables into account as possible, including the different rigid way of thinking and the interrelationship among the social sectors. Fourthly, during the German reunification unexpected factors changed the direction of the events. Korea should have a separate plan for the unexpected factors.
本研究调查了德国向统一医疗体系过渡的经验,并对韩国提出了以下启示。首先,如果有一份完善的路线图,德国本可以更好地利用统一进程。因此,韩国必须制定一份充分准备的路线图,考虑到所有可能的情况。其次,德国在统一初期看到了改善医疗体系的机会,但由于形势急剧变化且准备不足,未能加以利用。韩国应考虑改善当前医疗体系的机会,如公共卫生和传统医学的作用。第三,朝鲜的情况似乎比前东德还要糟糕得多,甚至比其他转型国家还要差[已修正]。因此,韩国应设计一份长期路线图,尽可能考虑到更多变量,包括不同的僵化思维方式以及社会各部门之间的相互关系。第四,在德国统一期间,意外因素改变了事件的发展方向。韩国应对意外因素制定单独的计划。