Scientific Institute for Quality of Healthcare (IQ healthcare), Radboud University Nijmegen Medical Centre, PO Box 9101, Nijmegen 6500 HB, The Netherlands.
Implement Sci. 2013 Jun 14;8:67. doi: 10.1186/1748-5908-8-67.
To use intensive care unit (ICU) facilities efficiently and ensure high quality of care, an optimal patient flow is necessary. Discharging patients relieves the pressure on ICU beds but the risk of premature discharge must be managed carefully. Suboptimal patient discharge may result in ICU readmissions and in patients' death.The aim of this study is to obtain insight into the safety and efficiency of current ICU discharge practices and into barriers and facilitators to the implementation of effective ICU discharge interventions, and to develop an implementation strategy tailored to the barriers and facilitators identified.
METHODS/DESIGN: This study exists of five phases. Phase A: analysis of routinely registered data on variation in ICU readmissions and hospital mortality after ICU discharge of all ICUs participating in the Dutch National Intensive Care Evaluation registry (n=83). Phase B: systematic review of effective interventions aiming to improve the efficiency and safety of the ICU discharge process. Phase C: assessing the intervention adherence with a questionnaire survey among all Dutch ICUs (n=90). Phase D: assessing barriers and facilitators to the implementation of effective ICU discharge interventions with a questionnaire survey among all Dutch intensivists (n=700). The questionnaire will be based on barriers and facilitators identified by focus groups (n=4) and individual interviews with professionals of ICUs and general wards and adult discharged ICU patients (n=25 to 30). Phase E: systematic development of an implementation strategy based on the sampled data in phase A to D, and effective implementation strategies from the literature using the intervention mapping method.
Using theory and empirical data, an implementation strategy will be developed to improve the safety and efficiency of the ICU discharge process. The developed strategy will be evaluated in a subsequent study. The knowledge obtained in this study should be used for further implementation of ICU discharge interventions, and can be used for implementation of handover interventions in other healthcare transition settings.
为了高效利用重症监护病房(ICU)资源并确保高质量的护理,需要有一个最佳的患者流转流程。让患者出院可以减轻 ICU 床位的压力,但必须谨慎管理过早出院的风险。患者出院处理不当可能导致 ICU 再次入院和患者死亡。本研究旨在深入了解当前 ICU 出院实践的安全性和效率,以及实施有效的 ICU 出院干预措施的障碍和促进因素,并制定针对所确定的障碍和促进因素的实施策略。
方法/设计:本研究分为五个阶段。阶段 A:分析所有参与荷兰国家重症监护评估登记处的 ICU 中患者 ICU 出院后 ICU 再入院和医院死亡率的变化的常规登记数据(n=83)。阶段 B:系统回顾旨在提高 ICU 出院过程效率和安全性的有效干预措施。阶段 C:对所有荷兰 ICU 进行问卷调查以评估干预措施的依从性(n=90)。阶段 D:对所有荷兰重症监护医生进行问卷调查以评估实施有效的 ICU 出院干预措施的障碍和促进因素(n=700)。问卷将基于焦点小组(n=4)和 ICU 与普通病房及成年 ICU 出院患者的专业人员的个人访谈中确定的障碍和促进因素(n=25 至 30)。阶段 E:基于阶段 A 至 D 中的抽样数据以及文献中的有效实施策略,使用干预映射方法系统地制定实施策略。
使用理论和经验数据,将制定一项实施策略,以提高 ICU 出院流程的安全性和效率。在随后的研究中评估所开发的策略。本研究获得的知识应用于进一步实施 ICU 出院干预措施,并可用于其他医疗保健过渡环境中交接干预措施的实施。