Saiki T, Gyo K, Yanagihara N
Department of Otolaryngology, Ehime University School of Medicine.
Nihon Jibiinkoka Gakkai Kaiho. 1990 Apr;93(4):566-71. doi: 10.3950/jibiinkoka.93.566.
Speech discrimination scores under noise circumstances were studied by use of the middle ear implant (MEI) and the conventional hearing aid (HA, HA-33, RION, Co, Ltd). The studies were performed in 10 patients implanted with the MEI and in 12 adult volunteers with normal hearing as a control. The tests were carried out using Japanese monosyllabic lists from 57S-speech discrimination test list as a test sound and multi-talker noise as a noise source. A speaker was placed in front of a subject in one meter apart. Sound characteristics of HA were adjusted as far as possible to those of the MEI by use of a sound equalizer. The intensity of speech sound pressure was adjusted at 65dB SPL, while that of the noise was changed to 65, 70 and 75dB SPL in the position of patients. Audiological evaluation of the MEI, the HA and control obtained by percentages of correct answers to 50 words in speech discrimination test with and without noise (65, 70, 75dB SPL). When the test was performed without noise, speech discrimination scores by the MEI and the HA were either 96.8 +/- 3.6% and 94.8 +/- 4.1%. However, under noise circumstances (65dB SPL) that by both devices were either 81.6 +/- 9.1% and 66.8 +/- 10.6% (P less than 0.001). When the intensity of the noise increased to 70 and 75dB SPL, speech discrimination scores by both devices deprecated together with consistent difference (P less than 0.01). Moreover speech discrimination scores by the MEI were almost same as control.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)
利用中耳植入物(MEI)和传统助听器(HA,HA - 33,理音株式会社)对噪声环境下的言语辨别分数进行了研究。研究在10名植入MEI的患者和12名听力正常的成年志愿者(作为对照)中进行。测试使用来自57S言语辨别测试列表的日语单音节词表作为测试声音,以多说话者噪声作为噪声源。在距离受试者前方一米处放置一个扬声器。通过使用声音均衡器,尽可能将HA的声音特性调整到与MEI的相同。言语声压强度调整为65dB SPL,而在患者位置处,噪声强度分别设置为65、70和75dB SPL。通过在有无噪声(65、70、75dB SPL)情况下对50个单词的言语辨别测试中正确答案的百分比,对MEI、HA和对照组进行听力学评估。在无噪声情况下进行测试时,MEI和HA的言语辨别分数分别为96.8±3.6%和94.8±4.1%。然而,在噪声环境(65dB SPL)下,两种设备的分数分别为81.6±9.1%和66.8±10.6%(P小于0.001)。当噪声强度增加到70和75dB SPL时,两种设备的言语辨别分数均下降,且差异一致(P小于0.01)。此外,MEI的言语辨别分数与对照组几乎相同。(摘要截短于250字)