• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Confronting diversity in the production of clinical evidence goes beyond merely including under-represented groups in clinical trials.应对临床证据产生中的多样性,不仅仅是将代表性不足的群体纳入临床试验。
Trials. 2013 Jun 15;14:177. doi: 10.1186/1745-6215-14-177.
2
Diversity and Inclusion in Pancreatic Cancer Clinical Trials.胰腺癌临床试验中的多样性与包容性。
Gastroenterology. 2021 Dec;161(6):1741-1746.e3. doi: 10.1053/j.gastro.2021.06.079. Epub 2021 Aug 17.
3
Overcoming Lack of Diversity in Cardiovascular Clinical Trials: A New Challenge and Strategies for Success.克服心血管临床试验中缺乏多样性的问题:一项新挑战与成功策略。
Circulation. 2019 Nov 19;140(21):1690-1692. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.119.041728. Epub 2019 Nov 18.
4
An overview of EMPaCT and fundamental issues affecting minority participation in cancer clinical trials: enhancing minority participation in clinical trials (EMPaCT): laying the groundwork for improving minority clinical trial accrual.增强少数群体参与癌症临床试验(EMPaCT)概述及影响少数群体参与癌症临床试验的基本问题:增强少数群体参与临床试验(EMPaCT):为改善少数群体临床试验入组奠定基础。
Cancer. 2014 Apr 1;120 Suppl 7(0 7):1087-90. doi: 10.1002/cncr.28569.
5
Increasing Ancestral Diversity in Lupus Trials: Ways Forward.增加狼疮试验中的祖先多样性:前进的道路。
Rheum Dis Clin North Am. 2020 Nov;46(4):713-722. doi: 10.1016/j.rdc.2020.07.011. Epub 2020 Sep 9.
6
Racial and ethnic health disparities in healthcare settings.医疗环境中的种族和民族健康差异。
BMJ. 2021 Mar 8;372:n605. doi: 10.1136/bmj.n605.
7
Recruitment of racial and ethnic minorities to clinical trials conducted within specialty clinics: an intervention mapping approach.在专科诊所开展的临床试验中招募种族和少数族裔:一种干预映射方法。
Trials. 2018 Feb 17;19(1):115. doi: 10.1186/s13063-018-2507-9.
8
Underrepresentation of Minorities and Underreporting of Race and Ethnicity in Crohn's Disease Clinical Trials.克罗恩病临床试验中少数族裔代表性不足及种族和族裔报告不充分的情况。
Gastroenterology. 2022 Jan;162(1):338-340.e2. doi: 10.1053/j.gastro.2021.09.054. Epub 2021 Sep 27.
9
Increasing Diversity in Clinical Trials: Overcoming Critical Barriers.提高临床试验的多样性:克服关键障碍。
Curr Probl Cardiol. 2019 May;44(5):148-172. doi: 10.1016/j.cpcardiol.2018.11.002. Epub 2018 Nov 9.
10
Most important articles on cardiovascular disease among racial and ethnic minorities.关于少数种族和族裔群体中心血管疾病的最重要文章。
Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes. 2012 Jul 1;5(4):e33-41. doi: 10.1161/CIRCOUTCOMES.112.967638.

引用本文的文献

1
Participation of under-represented communities in an online cognitive ageing platform and predictors of willingness to be contacted for future research.代表性不足的群体参与在线认知衰老平台的情况以及未来研究中愿意被联系的预测因素。
BMJ Public Health. 2025 Jun 20;3(1):e001721. doi: 10.1136/bmjph-2024-001721. eCollection 2025.
2
Exploring the implicit meanings of 'cultural diversity': a critical conceptual analysis of commonly used approaches in medical education.探索“文化多样性”的隐含意义:对医学教育中常用方法的批判性概念分析。
Adv Health Sci Educ Theory Pract. 2025 Jun;30(3):859-877. doi: 10.1007/s10459-024-10371-x. Epub 2024 Sep 14.
3
Racial and ethnic diversity in global neuroscience clinical trials.全球神经科学临床试验中的种族和民族多样性。
Contemp Clin Trials Commun. 2024 Jan 4;37:101255. doi: 10.1016/j.conctc.2024.101255. eCollection 2024 Feb.
4
Association Between Primary Care Use Prior to Cancer Diagnosis and Subsequent Cancer Mortality in the Veterans Affairs Health System.在退伍军人事务部医疗体系中,癌症诊断前的初级保健使用与随后的癌症死亡率之间的关联。
JAMA Netw Open. 2022 Nov 1;5(11):e2242048. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2022.42048.
5
Clinical trial diversity: An opportunity for improved insight into the determinants of variability in drug response.临床试验多样性:提高对药物反应变异性决定因素的认识的机会。
Br J Clin Pharmacol. 2022 Jun;88(6):2700-2717. doi: 10.1111/bcp.15242. Epub 2022 Feb 17.
6
Evaluating Prostate-Specific Antigen Screening for Young African American Men With Cancer.评估前列腺特异性抗原筛查在患有癌症的年轻非裔美国男性中的应用。
J Natl Cancer Inst. 2022 Apr 11;114(4):592-599. doi: 10.1093/jnci/djab221.
7
Optimizing a digital intervention for managing blood pressure in stroke patients using a diverse sample: Integrating the person-based approach and patient and public involvement.利用多样化样本优化管理中风患者血压的数字干预措施:整合以人为本的方法和患者及公众参与。
Health Expect. 2021 Apr;24(2):327-340. doi: 10.1111/hex.13173. Epub 2020 Dec 14.
8
Enhancing diversity to reduce health information disparities and build an evidence base for genomic medicine.增强多样性以减少健康信息差距并为基因组医学建立证据基础。
Per Med. 2018 Sep;15(5):403-412. doi: 10.2217/pme-2018-0037. Epub 2018 Sep 13.
9
Beyond sex and gender difference in funding and reporting of health research.除了健康研究资金投入和报告方面的性别差异之外。
Res Integr Peer Rev. 2018 Aug 28;3:6. doi: 10.1186/s41073-018-0050-6. eCollection 2018.
10
How should we evaluate research on counselling and the treatment of depression? A case study on how the National Institute for Health and Care Excellence's draft 2018 guideline for depression considered what counts as best evidence.我们应如何评估关于抑郁症咨询与治疗的研究?以英国国家卫生与临床优化研究所2018年抑郁症指南草案如何考量最佳证据为例进行研究。
Couns Psychother Res. 2017 Dec;17(4):253-268. doi: 10.1002/capr.12141. Epub 2017 Sep 19.

本文引用的文献

1
Unravelling the impact of ethnicity on health in Europe: the HELIUS study.揭示欧洲族群对健康的影响:HELIUS 研究。
BMC Public Health. 2013 Apr 27;13:402. doi: 10.1186/1471-2458-13-402.
2
Causal inference in public health.公共卫生中的因果推断。
Annu Rev Public Health. 2013;34:61-75. doi: 10.1146/annurev-publhealth-031811-124606. Epub 2013 Jan 7.
3
Gender difference in long-term prognosis among patients with cardiovascular disease.心血管疾病患者长期预后的性别差异。
Eur J Prev Cardiol. 2014 Jan;21(1):81-9. doi: 10.1177/2047487312460519. Epub 2012 Sep 5.
4
Relationships of coronary heart disease with 27-hydroxycholesterol, low-density lipoprotein cholesterol, and menopausal hormone therapy.冠心病与 27-羟胆固醇、低密度脂蛋白胆固醇和绝经激素治疗的关系。
Circulation. 2012 Sep 25;126(13):1577-86. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.112.103218. Epub 2012 Aug 29.
5
Commentary: who will help the United States attain the goal of health equity?评论:谁来帮助美国实现健康公平的目标?
Acad Med. 2012 Jun;87(6):689-90. doi: 10.1097/ACM.0b013e318253a152.
6
Principles for research on ethnicity and health: the Leeds Consensus Statement.族群与健康研究的原则:利兹共识声明。
Eur J Public Health. 2013 Jun;23(3):504-10. doi: 10.1093/eurpub/cks028. Epub 2012 May 2.
7
Burden of disease, health indicators and challenges for epidemiology in North America.北美疾病负担、健康指标及流行病学面临的挑战。
Int J Epidemiol. 2012 Apr;41(2):540-56. doi: 10.1093/ije/dys018. Epub 2012 Mar 9.
8
Research agenda for tackling inequalities related to migration and ethnicity in Europe.解决欧洲与移民和种族有关的不平等问题的研究议程。
J Public Health (Oxf). 2012 Jun;34(2):167-73. doi: 10.1093/pubmed/fds004. Epub 2012 Feb 24.
9
Women's health, men's health, and gender and health: implications of intersectionality.女性健康、男性健康以及性别与健康:交叉性的影响。
Soc Sci Med. 2012 Jun;74(11):1712-20. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2011.11.029. Epub 2012 Jan 25.
10
Inclusion and exclusion in nutrigenetics clinical research: ethical and scientific challenges.营养遗传学临床研究中的纳入与排除:伦理和科学挑战
J Nutrigenet Nutrigenomics. 2011;4(6):322-43. doi: 10.1159/000334853. Epub 2012 Jan 31.

应对临床证据产生中的多样性,不仅仅是将代表性不足的群体纳入临床试验。

Confronting diversity in the production of clinical evidence goes beyond merely including under-represented groups in clinical trials.

机构信息

Department of Public Health, Academic Medical Center, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.

出版信息

Trials. 2013 Jun 15;14:177. doi: 10.1186/1745-6215-14-177.

DOI:10.1186/1745-6215-14-177
PMID:23768231
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3689626/
Abstract

There is increasing evidence that outcomes of health care differ by patient characteristics, such as gender and ethnicity. If evidence-based medicine is to improve quality of care for all patients, it is essential to take this diversity into account when designing clinical studies. So far, this notion has mainly been translated into recommendations for including minority populations in trials. We argue that a more comprehensive view of the production of diversity-sensitive clinical evidence is needed, one that takes heterogeneity as a starting point in research. We call for a mix of methodological approaches aimed at identifying diversity issues that matter and analysing the impact of these diversities on clinical outcomes. Institutional changes are necessary to support this methodological reform.

摘要

越来越多的证据表明,医疗保健的结果因患者特征(如性别和种族)而异。如果循证医学要改善所有患者的护理质量,在设计临床研究时就必须考虑到这种多样性。到目前为止,这一概念主要被转化为在试验中纳入少数人群的建议。我们认为,需要更全面地看待产生敏感多样性的临床证据,即把异质性作为研究的起点。我们呼吁采取一系列方法,旨在确定重要的多样性问题,并分析这些多样性对临床结果的影响。需要进行体制变革,以支持这种方法改革。