Zanting Albertine, Frambach Janneke M, Meershoek Agnes, Krumeich Anja
Department of Health, Ethics and Society, School of Health Professions Education, Faculty of Health, Medicine and Life Sciences, Maastricht University, Maastricht, The Netherlands.
School of Health Professions Education, Faculty of Health, Medicine and Life Sciences, Maastricht University, Maastricht, The Netherlands.
Adv Health Sci Educ Theory Pract. 2025 Jun;30(3):859-877. doi: 10.1007/s10459-024-10371-x. Epub 2024 Sep 14.
Existing approaches to cultural diversity in medical education may be implicitly based on different conceptualisations of culture. Research has demonstrated that such interpretations matter to practices and people concerned. We therefore sought to identify the different conceptualisations espoused by these approaches and investigated their implications for education. We critically reviewed 52 articles from eight top medical education journals and subjected these to a conceptual analysis. Via open coding, we looked for references to approaches, their objectives, implicit notions of culture, and to implementation practices. We iteratively developed themes from the collected findings. We identified several approaches to cultural diversity teaching that used four different ways to conceptualise cultural diversity: culture as 'fixed patient characteristic', as 'multiple fixed characteristics', as 'dynamic outcome impacting social interactions', and as 'power dynamics'. We discussed the assumptions underlying these different notions, and reflected upon limitations and implications for educational practice. The notion of 'cultural diversity' challenges learners' communication skills, touches upon inherent inequalities and impacts how the field constructs knowledge. This study adds insights into how inherent inequalities in biomedical knowledge construction are rooted in methodological, ontological, and epistemological principles. Although these insights carry laborious implications for educational implementation, educators can learn from first initiatives, such as: standardly include information on patients' multiple identities and lived experiences in case descriptions, stimulate more reflection on teachers' and students' own values and hierarchical position, acknowledge Western epistemological hegemony, explicitly include literature from diverse sources, and monitor diversity-integrated topics in the curriculum.
医学教育中现有的文化多样性方法可能隐含地基于不同的文化概念。研究表明,这些解释对相关实践和人员很重要。因此,我们试图确定这些方法所支持的不同概念,并研究它们对教育的影响。我们批判性地回顾了八家顶级医学教育期刊的52篇文章,并对其进行了概念分析。通过开放式编码,我们寻找对方法、其目标、隐含的文化概念以及实施实践的提及。我们从收集到的研究结果中反复提炼出主题。我们确定了几种文化多样性教学方法,这些方法采用了四种不同的方式来概念化文化多样性:文化作为“固定的患者特征”、作为“多种固定特征”、作为“影响社会互动的动态结果”以及作为“权力动态”。我们讨论了这些不同概念背后的假设,并反思了其局限性以及对教育实践的影响。“文化多样性”这一概念挑战了学习者的沟通技巧,涉及到内在的不平等,并影响该领域构建知识的方式。本研究深入探讨了生物医学知识构建中的内在不平等如何植根于方法论、本体论和认识论原则。尽管这些见解对教育实施具有艰巨的影响,但教育工作者可以从最初的举措中学习,例如:在病例描述中标准地纳入患者多种身份和生活经历的信息,激发对教师和学生自身价值观及等级地位的更多反思,承认西方认识论的霸权,明确纳入来自不同来源的文献,并监测课程中与多样性相关的主题。