• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

经皮冠状动脉介入治疗中动脉入路选择对结果的影响:随机临床试验的结果能否在临床实践中实现?

Influence of arterial access site selection on outcomes in primary percutaneous coronary intervention: are the results of randomized trials achievable in clinical practice?

机构信息

Manchester Heart Centre, Manchester Royal Infirmary, Manchester, United Kingdom.

出版信息

JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2013 Jul;6(7):698-706. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2013.03.011. Epub 2013 Jun 14.

DOI:10.1016/j.jcin.2013.03.011
PMID:23769648
Abstract

OBJECTIVES

This study sought to investigate the influence of access site utilization on mortality, major adverse cardiac and cardiovascular events (MACCE), bleeding, and vascular complications in a large number of patients treated by primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PPCI) in the United Kingdom over a 5-year period, through analysis of the British Cardiovascular Intervention Society database.

BACKGROUND

Despite advances in antithrombotic and antiplatelet therapy, bleeding complications remain an important cause of morbidity and mortality in patients with acute ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) undergoing PPCI. A significant proportion of such bleeding complications are related to the access site, and adoption of radial access may reduce these complications. These benefits have not previously been studied in a large unselected national population of PPCI patients.

METHODS

Mortality (30-day), MACCE (a composite of 30-day mortality and in-hospital myocardial re-infarction, target vessel revascularization, and cerebrovascular events), and bleeding and access site complications were studied based on transfemoral access (TFA) and transradial access (TRA) site utilization in PPCI STEMI patients. The influence of access site selection was studied in 46,128 PPCI patients; TFA was used in 28,091 patients and TRA in 18,037. Data were adjusted for potential confounders using Cox regression that accounted for the propensity to undergo radial or femoral approach.

RESULTS

TRA was independently associated with a lower 30-day mortality (hazard ratio [HR]: 0.71, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.52 to 0.97; p < 0.05), in-hospital MACCE (HR: 0.73, 95% CI: 0.57 to 0.93; p < 0.05), major bleeding (HR: 0.37, 95% CI: 0.18 to 0.74; p < 0.01), and access site complications (HR: 0.38, 95% CI: 0.19 to 0.75; p < 0.01).

CONCLUSIONS

This analysis of a large number of PPCI procedures demonstrates that utilization of TRA is independently associated with major reductions in mortality, MACCE, major bleeding, and vascular complication rates.

摘要

目的

本研究通过分析英国心血管介入学会数据库,旨在探讨在英国超过 5 年的时间里,大量接受经皮冠状动脉介入治疗(PPCI)的患者中,入路选择对死亡率、主要不良心脏和心血管事件(MACCE)、出血和血管并发症的影响。

背景

尽管抗栓和抗血小板治疗取得了进展,但急性 ST 段抬高型心肌梗死(STEMI)患者接受 PPCI 后出血并发症仍是发病率和死亡率的重要原因。此类出血并发症中有相当一部分与入路部位有关,采用桡动脉入路可能会减少这些并发症。这些益处以前尚未在接受 PPCI 的大型未选择的全国人群中进行研究。

方法

根据经股动脉(TFA)和经桡动脉(TRA)入路在 STEMI 患者 PPCI 中的应用,研究死亡率(30 天)、MACCE(由 30 天死亡率和院内再梗死、靶血管血运重建和脑血管事件组成的复合终点)以及出血和入路部位并发症。在 46128 例 PPCI 患者中研究了入路选择的影响;28091 例患者采用 TFA,18037 例患者采用 TRA。使用 Cox 回归校正潜在混杂因素,该回归考虑了行桡动脉或股动脉入路的倾向性。

结果

TRA 与 30 天死亡率降低独立相关(风险比 [HR]:0.71,95%置信区间 [CI]:0.52 至 0.97;p < 0.05),院内 MACCE(HR:0.73,95% CI:0.57 至 0.93;p < 0.05)、大出血(HR:0.37,95% CI:0.18 至 0.74;p < 0.01)和入路部位并发症(HR:0.38,95% CI:0.19 至 0.75;p < 0.01)。

结论

对大量 PPCI 手术的分析表明,TRA 的应用与死亡率、MACCE、大出血和血管并发症发生率的显著降低独立相关。

相似文献

1
Influence of arterial access site selection on outcomes in primary percutaneous coronary intervention: are the results of randomized trials achievable in clinical practice?经皮冠状动脉介入治疗中动脉入路选择对结果的影响:随机临床试验的结果能否在临床实践中实现?
JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2013 Jul;6(7):698-706. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2013.03.011. Epub 2013 Jun 14.
2
Impact of Access Site Practice on Clinical Outcomes in Patients Undergoing Percutaneous Coronary Intervention Following Thrombolysis for ST-Segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction in the United Kingdom: An Insight From the British Cardiovascular Intervention Society Dataset.英国经溶栓治疗的 ST 段抬高型心肌梗死患者行经皮冠状动脉介入治疗中穿刺部位操作对临床结局的影响:来自英国心血管介入学会数据集的见解。
JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2017 Nov 27;10(22):2258-2265. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2017.07.049.
3
Impact of Access Site on Bleeding and Ischemic Events in Patients With Non-ST-Segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction Treated With Prasugrel: The ACCOAST Access Substudy.经普拉格雷治疗的非 ST 段抬高型心肌梗死患者的入路部位对出血和缺血事件的影响:ACCOAST 入路亚研究。
JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2016 May 9;9(9):897-907. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2016.01.041.
4
Transfemoral approach with systematic use of FemoSeal™ closure device compared to transradial approach in primary angioplasty.在初次血管成形术中,经股动脉途径与经桡动脉途径相比,系统使用FemoSeal™闭合装置。
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2016 Apr;87(5):849-54. doi: 10.1002/ccd.26076. Epub 2015 Jun 23.
5
Access site practice and procedural outcomes in relation to clinical presentation in 439,947 patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention in the United kingdom.在英国,439947 例行经皮冠状动脉介入治疗的患者中,根据临床表现评估介入部位的应用情况和手术结果。
JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2015 Jan;8(1 Pt A):20-9. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2014.06.026.
6
Association of radial versus femoral access with contrast-induced acute kidney injury in patients undergoing primary percutaneous coronary intervention for ST-elevation myocardial infarction.在接受ST段抬高型心肌梗死直接经皮冠状动脉介入治疗的患者中,桡动脉与股动脉入路与对比剂诱导的急性肾损伤的相关性。
Cardiovasc Revasc Med. 2016 Dec;17(8):546-551. doi: 10.1016/j.carrev.2016.07.008. Epub 2016 Jul 21.
7
Transradial versus transfemoral approach for percutaneous coronary intervention in cardiogenic shock: A radial-first centre experience and meta-analysis of published studies.经桡动脉与经股动脉途径用于心源性休克患者的经皮冠状动脉介入治疗:来自桡动脉优先中心的经验及已发表研究的荟萃分析
Arch Cardiovasc Dis. 2015 Nov;108(11):563-75. doi: 10.1016/j.acvd.2015.06.005. Epub 2015 Sep 11.
8
Radial versus femoral access for primary percutaneous interventions in ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction patients: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.经桡动脉与股动脉入路行直接经皮冠状动脉介入治疗急性 ST 段抬高型心肌梗死患者的随机对照试验的荟萃分析
JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2013 Aug;6(8):814-23. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2013.04.010.
9
Relationship Between Femoral Vascular Closure Devices and Short-Term Mortality From 271 845 Percutaneous Coronary Intervention Procedures Performed in the United Kingdom Between 2006 and 2011: A Propensity Score-Corrected Analysis From the British Cardiovascular Intervention Society.2006年至2011年在英国进行的271845例经皮冠状动脉介入治疗中股动脉血管闭合装置与短期死亡率的关系:来自英国心血管介入学会的倾向评分校正分析
Circ Cardiovasc Interv. 2016 Jun;9(6). doi: 10.1161/CIRCINTERVENTIONS.116.003560.
10
Radial versus femoral access for percutaneous coronary intervention in ST-elevation myocardial infarction patients treated with fibrinolysis: Results from the randomized routine early invasive clinical trials.在接受溶栓治疗的ST段抬高型心肌梗死患者中,经皮冠状动脉介入治疗采用桡动脉入路与股动脉入路的比较:随机常规早期有创临床试验的结果
Cardiovasc Revasc Med. 2016 Jul-Aug;17(5):295-301. doi: 10.1016/j.carrev.2016.03.008. Epub 2016 Mar 28.

引用本文的文献

1
Effect of Peri-Interventional Blood Loss on In-Stent Thrombosis After Percutaneous Coronary Intervention in Patients with Acute Myocardial Infarction.急性心肌梗死患者经皮冠状动脉介入治疗期间失血对支架内血栓形成的影响
J Cardiovasc Dev Dis. 2025 Feb 12;12(2):67. doi: 10.3390/jcdd12020067.
2
Effect of Radial Artery Compression with a Novel Automatic Pressure-Controlled Radial Compression Device: A Short-Term Prospective Interventional Pilot Study.新型自动压力控制桡动脉压迫装置对桡动脉压迫效果的短期前瞻性介入性初步研究。
J Interv Cardiol. 2023 Mar 7;2023:7533702. doi: 10.1155/2023/7533702. eCollection 2023.
3
State-of-the-Art Endovascular Therapies for the Femoropopliteal Segment: Are We There Yet?
股腘段的先进血管内治疗:我们做到了吗?
J Soc Cardiovasc Angiogr Interv. 2022 Sep-Oct;1(5). doi: 10.1016/j.jscai.2022.100439. Epub 2022 Aug 20.
4
Association between operator volume and mortality in primary percutaneous coronary intervention.直接经皮冠状动脉介入治疗中术者手术量与死亡率的关系。
Open Heart. 2022 Oct;9(2). doi: 10.1136/openhrt-2022-002072.
5
Vascular Closure Devices versus Manual Compression in Cardiac Interventional Procedures: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.血管闭合装置与心脏介入手术中的手动压迫:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Cardiovasc Ther. 2022 Sep 9;2022:8569188. doi: 10.1155/2022/8569188. eCollection 2022.
6
Transradial versus transfemoral access for cardiac catheterization: a nationwide pilot study of training preferences and expertise in The United States.经桡动脉与经股动脉入路行心导管术:美国一项关于培训偏好和专长的全国性试点研究。
BMC Cardiovasc Disord. 2021 May 21;21(1):250. doi: 10.1186/s12872-021-02068-5.
7
Radial artery access is associated with lower mortality in patients undergoing primary PCI: a report from the SWEDEHEART registry.桡动脉入路与行直接经皮冠状动脉介入治疗的患者的死亡率降低相关:来自 SWEDEHEART 注册研究的报告。
Eur Heart J Acute Cardiovasc Care. 2020 Jun;9(4):323-332. doi: 10.1177/2048872620908032.
8
Comparison of acute kidney injury with radial vs. femoral access for patients undergoing coronary catheterization: An updated meta-analysis of 46,816 patients.冠状动脉导管插入术患者经桡动脉与股动脉入路急性肾损伤的比较:对46,816例患者的最新荟萃分析
Exp Ther Med. 2020 Nov;20(5):42. doi: 10.3892/etm.2020.9170. Epub 2020 Sep 2.
9
Comparison between radial versus femoral percutaneous coronary intervention access in Indonesian hospitals, 2017-2018: A prospective observational study of a national registry.2017 - 2018年印度尼西亚医院桡动脉与股动脉经皮冠状动脉介入治疗途径的比较:一项全国登记处的前瞻性观察研究
Int J Cardiol Heart Vasc. 2020 Mar 2;27:100488. doi: 10.1016/j.ijcha.2020.100488. eCollection 2020 Apr.
10
Radial artery access site complications during cardiac procedures, clinical implications and potential solutions: The role of nitric oxide.心脏手术中桡动脉穿刺部位并发症、临床意义及潜在解决方案:一氧化氮的作用
World J Cardiol. 2020 Jan 26;12(1):26-34. doi: 10.4330/wjc.v12.i1.26.