• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

丹麦的工作场所健康促进活动是否覆盖了相关目标群体?

Does workplace health promotion in Denmark reach relevant target groups?

作者信息

Jørgensen Marie Birk, Villadsen Ebbe, Burr Hermann, Mortensen Ole Steen, Holtermann Andreas

机构信息

National Research Centre for the Working Environment, Lersø Parkallé 105, 2100 Copenhagen, Denmark

National Research Centre for the Working Environment, Lersø Parkallé 105, 2100 Copenhagen, Denmark.

出版信息

Health Promot Int. 2015 Jun;30(2):318-27. doi: 10.1093/heapro/dat041. Epub 2013 Jun 15.

DOI:10.1093/heapro/dat041
PMID:23770769
Abstract

The aim of the current study was to investigate whether Workplace Health Promotion (WHP) is available for workers with poor health status (overweight, musculoskeletal disorders, sickness absence and poor self-rated health) or health behaviour (smoking, poor diet and sedentarism) and whether they participate in WHP. In total, 9835 workers responded to questions regarding availability to 6 different types of WHP through The Danish Work Environment Cohort Study in 2010. Logistic regression analyses adjusted for age, gender and industry were performed to calculate odds ratios for availability and participation of WHP among groups with different health behaviours and health status. In general, poor health behaviours were associated with reduced availability of and participation in WHP. In contrast, poor health status was generally associated with higher availability of WHP and increased participation. However, poor self-rated health was associated with lower availability of several types of WHP and reduced participation. In general, workers with health challenges that are visible to others had WHP available, whereas workers with less visible health challenges had WHP less frequently available. Health challenges visible to others were associated with higher participation in WHP, whereas poor health behaviour and reduced self-rated health were associated with reduced participation in WHP programmes.

摘要

本研究的目的是调查工作场所健康促进(WHP)是否适用于健康状况不佳(超重、肌肉骨骼疾病、病假和自我健康评价差)或健康行为不良(吸烟、饮食不良和久坐不动)的工人,以及他们是否参与WHP。2010年,共有9835名工人通过丹麦工作环境队列研究回答了有关6种不同类型WHP可及性的问题。进行了年龄、性别和行业调整的逻辑回归分析,以计算不同健康行为和健康状况组中WHP可及性和参与度的比值比。总体而言,不良健康行为与WHP可及性降低和参与度降低相关。相比之下,健康状况不佳通常与WHP可及性较高和参与度增加相关。然而,自我健康评价差与几种类型WHP的可及性较低和参与度降低相关。一般来说,有他人可见健康问题的工人可获得WHP,而有较难察觉健康问题的工人获得WHP的频率较低。他人可见的健康问题与更高的WHP参与度相关,而不良健康行为和自我健康评价降低与WHP项目参与度降低相关。

相似文献

1
Does workplace health promotion in Denmark reach relevant target groups?丹麦的工作场所健康促进活动是否覆盖了相关目标群体?
Health Promot Int. 2015 Jun;30(2):318-27. doi: 10.1093/heapro/dat041. Epub 2013 Jun 15.
2
Does employee participation in workplace health promotion depend on the working environment? A cross-sectional study of Danish workers.员工对工作场所健康促进的参与度是否取决于工作环境?一项针对丹麦工人的横断面研究。
BMJ Open. 2016 Jun 8;6(6):e010516. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2015-010516.
3
Barriers and facilitators to participation in workplace health promotion (WHP) activities: results from a cross-sectional survey of public-sector employees in Tasmania, Australia.参与工作场所健康促进(WHP)活动的障碍与促进因素:澳大利亚塔斯马尼亚州公共部门员工横断面调查结果
Health Promot J Austr. 2017 Dec;28(3):225-232. doi: 10.1071/HE16052.
4
Does workplace health promotion reach shift workers?工作场所健康促进活动能覆盖倒班工人吗?
Scand J Work Environ Health. 2015 Jan;41(1):84-93. doi: 10.5271/sjweh.3469. Epub 2014 Nov 24.
5
An Overview of State Policies Supporting Worksite Health Promotion Programs.支持工作场所健康促进项目的国家政策概述。
Am J Health Promot. 2017 May;31(3):232-242. doi: 10.4278/ajhp.141008-QUAN-505. Epub 2016 Jan 5.
6
Time and participation in workplace health promotion: Australian qualitative study.时间与工作场所健康促进的参与:澳大利亚定性研究。
Health Promot Int. 2018 Jun 1;33(3):436-447. doi: 10.1093/heapro/daw078.
7
Does workplace health promotion contribute to job stress reduction? Three-year findings from Partnering Healthy@Work.工作场所健康促进是否有助于减轻工作压力?来自“携手健康@工作”项目的三年研究结果。
BMC Public Health. 2015 Dec 24;15:1293. doi: 10.1186/s12889-015-2625-1.
8
Why do managers allocate resources to workplace health promotion programmes in countries with national health coverage?在拥有全民医保的国家,为何管理者会为职场健康促进项目分配资源?
Health Promot Int. 2007 Jun;22(2):102-11. doi: 10.1093/heapro/dam002. Epub 2007 Mar 5.
9
Association between workplace health promotion service utilisation and depressive symptoms among workers: a nationwide survey.工作场所健康促进服务利用与工人抑郁症状之间的关联:一项全国性调查。
Public Health. 2024 Jun;231:64-70. doi: 10.1016/j.puhe.2024.03.001. Epub 2024 Apr 17.
10
Patterns and predictors of workplace health promotion: cross-sectional findings from a company survey in Germany.工作场所健康促进的模式与预测因素:德国一项公司调查的横断面研究结果
BMC Public Health. 2015 Apr 9;15:343. doi: 10.1186/s12889-015-1647-z.

引用本文的文献

1
In or out of reach? Long-term trends in the reach of health assessments in the Swedish occupational setting.是否可及?瑞典职业环境中健康评估覆盖范围的长期趋势。
Scand J Work Environ Health. 2024 Dec 1;50(8):641-652. doi: 10.5271/sjweh.4192. Epub 2024 Oct 21.
2
Cognitive Job Demands and Sports Participation among Young Workers: What Moderates the Relationship?认知型工作要求与青年工人的运动参与:什么因素调节了这种关系?
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2024 Jan 28;21(2):144. doi: 10.3390/ijerph21020144.
3
Worksite Health Promotion and Work Performance: Both Awareness and Use Matter.
工作场所健康促进与工作绩效:意识与应用同样重要。
J Occup Environ Med. 2023 Nov 1;65(11):949-957. doi: 10.1097/JOM.0000000000002942. Epub 2023 Aug 12.
4
How much do we know about the effectiveness of warm-up intervention on work related musculoskeletal disorders, physical and psychosocial functions: protocol for a systematic review.我们对热身干预对工作相关肌肉骨骼疾病、身体和心理社会功能的有效性了解多少:一项系统评价方案
BMJ Open. 2020 Nov 26;10(11):e039063. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-039063.
5
Can Childcare Work Be Designed to Promote High Intensity Physical Activity for Improved Fitness and Health? A Proof of Concept Study of the Goldilocks Principle.儿童保育工作能否通过设计来促进高强度的身体活动,以提高健康和体能?金氏原则的概念验证研究。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020 Oct 12;17(20):7419. doi: 10.3390/ijerph17207419.
6
Can childcare work be designed to promote moderate and vigorous physical activity, cardiorespiratory fitness and health? Study protocol for the Goldilocks-childcare randomised controlled trial.托育工作能否设计成促进适度和剧烈身体活动、心肺适能和健康? Goldilocks 托育随机对照试验研究方案。
BMC Public Health. 2020 Feb 17;20(1):237. doi: 10.1186/s12889-020-8291-y.
7
Worksite health promotion and social inequalities in health.工作场所健康促进与健康方面的社会不平等。
SSM Popul Health. 2020 Jan 17;10:100543. doi: 10.1016/j.ssmph.2020.100543. eCollection 2020 Apr.
8
Does employee participation in workplace health promotion depend on the working environment? A cross-sectional study of Danish workers.员工对工作场所健康促进的参与度是否取决于工作环境?一项针对丹麦工人的横断面研究。
BMJ Open. 2016 Jun 8;6(6):e010516. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2015-010516.
9
Patterns and predictors of workplace health promotion: cross-sectional findings from a company survey in Germany.工作场所健康促进的模式与预测因素:德国一项公司调查的横断面研究结果
BMC Public Health. 2015 Apr 9;15:343. doi: 10.1186/s12889-015-1647-z.
10
How needs and preferences of employees influence participation in health promotion programs: a six-month follow-up study.员工的需求和偏好如何影响健康促进项目的参与度:一项为期六个月的随访研究。
BMC Public Health. 2014 Dec 15;14:1277. doi: 10.1186/1471-2458-14-1277.