Department of Otolaryngology, Georgia Skull Base Center, Georgia Regents University School of Medicine, 1120 15th St, BP-4109, Augusta, GA, 30912, USA,
Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2014 Apr;271(4):787-94. doi: 10.1007/s00405-013-2581-2. Epub 2013 Jun 15.
Recent advances in endonasal endoscopy have facilitated the surgical access to the lateral skull base including areas such as Meckel's cave. This approach has been well documented, however, few studies have outlined transantral specific access to Meckel's. A transantral approach provides a direct pathway to this region obviating the need for extensive endonasal and transsphenoidal resection. Our aim in this study is to compare the anatomical perspectives obtained in endonasal and transantral approaches. We prepared 14 cadaveric specimens with intravascular injections of colored latex. Eight cadavers underwent endoscopic endonasal transpterygoid approaches to Meckel's cave. Six additional specimens underwent an endoscopic transantral approach to the same region. Photographic evidence was obtained for review. 30 CT scans were analyzed to measure comparative distances to Meckel's cave for both approaches. The endoscopic approaches provided a direct access to the anterior and inferior portions of Meckel's cave. However, the transantral approach required shorter instrumentation, and did not require clearing of the endonasal corridor. This approach gave an anterior view of Meckel's cave making posterior dissection more difficult. A transantral approach to Meckel's cave provides access similar to the endonasal approach with minimal invasiveness. Some of the morbidity associated with extensive endonasal resection could possibly be avoided. Better understanding of the complex skull base anatomy, from different perspectives, helps to improve current endoscopic skull base surgery and to develop new alternatives, consequently, leading to improvements in safety and efficacy.
经鼻内镜技术的进步使得颅底外侧区域(如 Meckel 腔)的手术入路变得更加容易。虽然这种方法已经有了很好的记录,但是很少有研究概述了经蝶窦入路到 Meckel 腔的具体方法。经蝶窦入路为到达该区域提供了直接途径,避免了广泛的经鼻和经蝶窦切除术。我们在这项研究中的目的是比较经鼻和经蝶窦入路获得的解剖学视角。我们用彩色乳胶对 14 具尸体标本进行了血管内注射。8 具尸体标本接受了经鼻内镜经翼突入路到 Meckel 腔的手术。另外 6 个标本接受了同样区域的经鼻内镜经蝶窦入路手术。为了进行回顾,我们获得了照片证据。对 30 个 CT 扫描进行了分析,以测量两种方法到达 Meckel 腔的比较距离。经鼻内镜入路可以直接到达 Meckel 腔的前下部。然而,经蝶窦入路需要的器械更短,并且不需要清除经鼻通道。这种方法可以看到 Meckel 腔的前视图,使得后部解剖更加困难。经蝶窦入路到 Meckel 腔的方法提供了与经鼻入路相似的通道,具有最小的侵袭性。可能可以避免与广泛的经鼻切除术相关的一些发病率。从不同的角度更好地了解复杂的颅底解剖结构有助于提高当前的内镜颅底手术水平,并开发新的替代方法,从而提高安全性和疗效。