• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

韩国癌症的失能权重。

Disability weights for cancers in Korea.

机构信息

Department of Social and Preventive Medicine, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Jangan-gu, Suwon, Korea.

出版信息

J Korean Med Sci. 2013 Jun;28(6):808-13. doi: 10.3346/jkms.2013.28.6.808. Epub 2013 Jun 3.

DOI:10.3346/jkms.2013.28.6.808
PMID:23772142
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3677994/
Abstract

This study renewed the estimation of disability weights for cancers in Korea, reflecting the nation's economic and medical-technological development during the past 10 yr. Thirty-two medical doctors evaluated disability weights for 24 major cancers based on the visual analogue scale (VAS) method. To check the intra-rater reliability, a correlation was calculated between 2011 and 2012 medians. To assess the inter-rater reliability, a correlation was estimated between oncologist and non-oncologist medians. To assess the inter-method reliability, a correlation was calculated between medians on VAS and Person-Trade-Off approaches. Moreover, findings in this study were compared to those in 2003 research. Spearman correlation was used and the 1% significance level was applied. Disability weights were relatively high for pancreas cancer (0.90), gallbladder cancer (0.81), mouth and oropharynx cancer (0.80), and esophagus cancer (0.80). Conversely, they were relatively low for breast cancer (0.37), prostate cancer (0.33) and thyroid cancer (0.10). All the inter-rater reliabilities were higher than 0.7. Indeed, the intra-rater and inter-method reliabilities were 0.752 and 0.927, respectively. Above all, disability weights for major cancers went down in Korea during 2003-2012, reflecting the progress of medical technology and the growth of cancer survival.

摘要

这项研究更新了韩国癌症残疾权重的估计,反映了过去 10 年来国家经济和医疗技术的发展。32 名医生根据视觉模拟量表(VAS)方法评估了 24 种主要癌症的残疾权重。为了检查内部评分者的可靠性,计算了 2011 年和 2012 年中位数之间的相关性。为了评估评分者间的可靠性,计算了肿瘤学家和非肿瘤学家中位数之间的相关性。为了评估跨方法的可靠性,计算了 VAS 和个人交易法中位数之间的相关性。此外,还将本研究的结果与 2003 年的研究进行了比较。使用 Spearman 相关系数,应用 1%的显著性水平。胰腺癌(0.90)、胆囊癌(0.81)、口腔和口咽癌(0.80)和食管癌(0.80)的残疾权重相对较高。相反,乳腺癌(0.37)、前列腺癌(0.33)和甲状腺癌(0.10)的残疾权重相对较低。所有评分者间的可靠性都高于 0.7。事实上,内部评分者和跨方法的可靠性分别为 0.752 和 0.927。最重要的是,2003-2012 年期间,韩国主要癌症的残疾权重下降,反映了医疗技术的进步和癌症生存率的提高。

相似文献

1
Disability weights for cancers in Korea.韩国癌症的失能权重。
J Korean Med Sci. 2013 Jun;28(6):808-13. doi: 10.3346/jkms.2013.28.6.808. Epub 2013 Jun 3.
2
Estimation of Disability Weights in the General Population of South Korea Using a Paired Comparison.使用配对比较法对韩国普通人群的残疾权重进行估计。
PLoS One. 2016 Sep 8;11(9):e0162478. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0162478. eCollection 2016.
3
Disability Weights Measurement for 228 Causes of Disease in the Korean Burden of Disease Study 2012.《2012年韩国疾病负担研究中228种疾病的残疾权重测量》
J Korean Med Sci. 2016 Nov;31 Suppl 2(Suppl 2):S129-S138. doi: 10.3346/jkms.2016.31.S2.S129.
4
Burden of cancer in Korea during 2000-2020.2000-2020 年韩国的癌症负担。
Cancer Epidemiol. 2013 Aug;37(4):353-9. doi: 10.1016/j.canep.2013.03.015. Epub 2013 Apr 30.
5
Updating Korean Disability Weights for Causes of Disease: Adopting an Add-on Study Method.更新韩国疾病伤残权重:采用附加研究方法。
J Prev Med Public Health. 2023 Jul;56(4):291-302. doi: 10.3961/jpmph.23.192. Epub 2023 Jun 26.
6
[Estimation of disability weights on malignant neoplasms in Shandong province].[山东省恶性肿瘤伤残权重估计]
Zhonghua Liu Xing Bing Xue Za Zhi. 2008 Dec;29(12):1208-12.
7
Disability Weights Measurement for 289 Causes of Disease Considering Disease Severity in Korea.考虑疾病严重程度的韩国 289 种疾病的残疾权重测量。
J Korean Med Sci. 2019 Feb 14;34(Suppl 1):e60. doi: 10.3346/jkms.2019.34.e60. eCollection 2019 Mar 26.
8
Inter-rater and intra-rater reliability of disability ratings based on the modified D Code of the ICIDH.基于国际功能、残疾和健康分类(ICIDH)修订版D编码的残疾评定的评定者间信度和评定者内信度
Int Disabil Stud. 1990 Jan-Mar;12(1):20-1. doi: 10.3109/03790799009166597.
9
Updating Disability Weights for Measurement of Healthy Life Expectancy and Disability-adjusted Life Year in Korea.更新韩国健康期望寿命和伤残调整生命年测量中的残疾权重。
J Korean Med Sci. 2020 Jul 13;35(27):e219. doi: 10.3346/jkms.2020.35.e219.
10
The relationship between government research funding and the cancer burden in South Korea: implications for prioritising health research.韩国政府研究资金与癌症负担之间的关系:对优先开展健康研究的启示。
Health Res Policy Syst. 2019 Dec 23;17(1):103. doi: 10.1186/s12961-019-0510-6.

引用本文的文献

1
A systematic literature review of disability weights measurement studies: evolution of methodological choices.残疾权重测量研究的系统文献综述:方法选择的演变
Arch Public Health. 2022 Mar 24;80(1):91. doi: 10.1186/s13690-022-00860-z.
2
Health Utility Book (HUB)-Cancer: Protocol for a Systematic Literature Review of Health State Utility Values in Cancer.健康效用手册(HUB)-癌症:癌症健康状态效用值系统文献综述方案
MDM Policy Pract. 2019 Aug 13;4(2):2381468319852594. doi: 10.1177/2381468319852594. eCollection 2019 Jul-Dec.
3
National Burden of Cancers Attributable to Secondhand Smoking in Indonesia.印度尼西亚因二手烟导致的癌症国家负担。
Asian Pac J Cancer Prev. 2018 Jul 27;19(7):1951-1955. doi: 10.22034/APJCP.2018.19.7.1951.
4
Disability Weights Measurement for 228 Causes of Disease in the Korean Burden of Disease Study 2012.《2012年韩国疾病负担研究中228种疾病的残疾权重测量》
J Korean Med Sci. 2016 Nov;31 Suppl 2(Suppl 2):S129-S138. doi: 10.3346/jkms.2016.31.S2.S129.
5
Estimation of Disability Weights in the General Population of South Korea Using a Paired Comparison.使用配对比较法对韩国普通人群的残疾权重进行估计。
PLoS One. 2016 Sep 8;11(9):e0162478. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0162478. eCollection 2016.

本文引用的文献

1
Disability weights for the korean burden of disease study: focused on comparison with disability weights in the Australian burden of disease study.韩国疾病负担研究的残疾权重:侧重于与澳大利亚疾病负担研究中的残疾权重进行比较。
J Prev Med Public Health. 2004 Feb;37(1):59-71.
2
Burden of disease due to cancer in England and Wales.英格兰和威尔士的癌症疾病负担。
J Public Health (Oxf). 2012 Jun;34(2):287-95. doi: 10.1093/pubmed/fdr093. Epub 2011 Dec 2.
3
Is health screening beneficial for early detection and prognostic improvement in pancreatic cancer?健康筛查对胰腺癌的早期检测和预后改善有益吗?
Gut Liver. 2011 Jun;5(2):194-9. doi: 10.5009/gnl.2011.5.2.194. Epub 2011 Jun 24.
4
Cancer statistics in Korea: incidence, mortality, survival, and prevalence in 2008.韩国癌症统计数据:2008 年的发病率、死亡率、生存率和患病率。
Cancer Res Treat. 2011 Mar;43(1):1-11. doi: 10.4143/crt.2011.43.1.1. Epub 2011 Mar 31.
5
[Economic burden of cancer in South Korea for the year 2005].[2005年韩国癌症的经济负担]
J Prev Med Public Health. 2009 May;42(3):190-8. doi: 10.3961/jpmph.2009.42.3.190.
6
Burden of disease due to cancer in Spain.西班牙癌症所致的疾病负担。
BMC Public Health. 2009 Jan 30;9:42. doi: 10.1186/1471-2458-9-42.
7
How do we improve outcomes for gastric cancer?我们如何改善胃癌的治疗效果?
J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2007 Jul;22(7):970-2. doi: 10.1111/j.1440-1746.2007.04956.x. Epub 2007 May 24.
8
Projections of global mortality and burden of disease from 2002 to 2030.2002年至2030年全球死亡率及疾病负担预测。
PLoS Med. 2006 Nov;3(11):e442. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.0030442.
9
[Estimating the burden of psychiatric disorder in Korea].[韩国精神疾病负担的评估]
J Prev Med Public Health. 2006 Jan;39(1):39-45.
10
Estimation of the burden of major cancers in Korea.韩国主要癌症负担的估算。
J Korean Med Sci. 2002 Oct;17(5):604-10. doi: 10.3346/jkms.2002.17.5.604.