文献检索文档翻译深度研究
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
邀请有礼套餐&价格历史记录

新学期,新优惠

限时优惠:9月1日-9月22日

30天高级会员仅需29元

1天体验卡首发特惠仅需5.99元

了解详情
不再提醒
插件&应用
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
高级版
套餐订阅购买积分包
AI 工具
文献检索文档翻译深度研究
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2025

Laser doppler line scan burn imager (LDLS-BI): sideways move or a step ahead?

作者信息

Holland A J A, Ward D, La Hei E R, Harvey J G

机构信息

Discipline of Paediatrics and Child Health, Sydney Medical School, The University of Sydney, Australia; Burns Unit and The Children's Hospital at Westmead Burns Research Institute, Sydney, Australia; Douglas Cohen Department of Paediatric Surgery, The Children's Hospital at Westmead, Sydney, Australia.

Burns Unit and The Children's Hospital at Westmead Burns Research Institute, Sydney, Australia.

出版信息

Burns. 2014 Feb;40(1):113-9. doi: 10.1016/j.burns.2013.05.008. Epub 2013 Jun 14.


DOI:10.1016/j.burns.2013.05.008
PMID:23773790
Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To assess the accuracy of a Laser Doppler Line Scanner (LDLS) in predicting burn wound healing in children compared to conventional Laser Doppler Imaging (LDI). METHODS: A prospective study comparing a LDLS with a conventional LDI to assess burn wound Healing Potential (HP) was performed in 50 paediatric patients presenting to our institution between February 2010 and March 2011, as part of a multi-centre, international trial. Inclusion criteria were superficial to deep dermal burns that were able to be scanned between 42 h and 5 days of the burn. RESULTS: Of the 50 patients enrolled, one was excluded from subsequent analysis as they were unable to present for wound reviews at 14 and 21 days. Ninety scans were performed of 59 burn wounds in the remaining 49 patients. The mean age was 4 years and 9 months (range 8 months to 16 years) and the mean Total Body Surface Area burnt was 8.3% (range 0.1-15%). The most common mechanism of injury was a scald, followed by contact and flame burns. A limb was the most common site of injury. Overall accuracy of the scanners was 94.5% (LDI) and 95% (LDLS), with accuracy lowest for indeterminate burns that healed within 14-21 days. CONCLUSION: The LDLS was found to be as accurate as the LDI in predicting burn wound HP in children. Whilst the LDLS scan resolution was lower, with more scans of larger burns required, its smaller size and greater scan speed proved valuable in children.

摘要

相似文献

[1]
Laser doppler line scan burn imager (LDLS-BI): sideways move or a step ahead?

Burns. 2014-2

[2]
A new, fast LDI for assessment of burns: a multi-centre clinical evaluation.

Burns. 2014-11

[3]
Relationship between healing time and mean perfusion units of laser Doppler imaging (LDI) in pediatric burns.

Burns. 2009-9

[4]
Laser Doppler imaging in a paediatric burns population.

Burns. 2009-9

[5]
Burn wound healing time assessed by laser Doppler imaging (LDI). Part 1: Derivation of a dedicated colour code for image interpretation.

Burns. 2011-11-23

[6]
Laser Doppler imaging of paediatric burns: burn wound outcome can be predicted independent of clinical examination.

Burns. 2006-8

[7]
Friction burns in children: does laser Doppler imaging have a role?

J Burn Care Res. 2012

[8]
Ultrasound assessed thickness of burn scars in association with laser Doppler imaging determined depth of burns in paediatric patients.

Burns. 2010-6-22

[9]
The time factor in the LDI (Laser Doppler Imaging) diagnosis of burns.

Lasers Surg Med. 2015-2

[10]
Assessing paediatric scald injuries using Laser Speckle Contrast Imaging.

Burns. 2012-10-23

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

推荐工具

医学文档翻译智能文献检索