Heredia-Rizo Alberto Marcos, Oliva-Pascual-Vaca Angel, Rodríguez-Blanco Cleofás, Piña-Pozo Fernando, Luque-Carrasco Antonio, Herrera-Monge Patricia
Department of Physical Therapy, Faculty of Nursing, Physiotherapy and Podiatry, University of Sevilla, Sevilla, Spain.
J Manipulative Physiol Ther. 2013 Jun;36(5):310-8. doi: 10.1016/j.jmpt.2013.05.011. Epub 2013 Jun 14.
This study aimed to assess the immediate effects on masticatory muscle mechanosensitivity, maximal vertical mouth opening (VMO), and head posture in pain-free healthy participants after intervention with myofascial treatment in the temporalis and masseter muscles.
A randomized, double-blind study was conducted. The sample group included 48 participants (n=48), with a mean age of 21±2.47 years (18-29). Two subgroups were defined: an intervention group (n=24), who underwent a fascial induction protocol in the masseter and temporalis muscles, and a control group (n=24), who underwent a sham (placebo) intervention. The pressure pain threshold in 2 locations in the masseter (M1, M2) and temporalis (T1, T2) muscles, maximal VMO, and head posture, by means of the craniovertebral angle, were all measured.
Significant improvements were observed in the intragroup comparison in the intervention group for the craniovertebral angle with the participant in seated (P<.001; F1,23=16.45, R2=0.41) and standing positions (P=.012, F1,23=7.49, R2=0.24) and for the pressure pain threshold in the masticatory muscles, except for M2 (P=.151; M1: P=.003; F1,23=11.34, R2=0.33; T1: P=.013, F1,23=7.25, R2=0.23; T2: P=.019, F1,23=6.41, R2=0.21). There were no intragroup differences for the VMO (P=.542). Nevertheless, no significant differences were observed in the intergroup analysis in any of the studied variables (P>.05).
Myofascial induction techniques in the masseter and temporalis muscles show no significant differences in maximal VMO, in the mechanical sensitivity of the masticatory muscles, and in head posture in comparison with a placebo intervention in which the therapist's hands are placed in the temporomandibular joint region without exerting any therapeutic pressure.
本研究旨在评估颞肌和咬肌进行肌筋膜治疗后,对无疼痛的健康参与者咀嚼肌机械敏感性、最大垂直开口度(VMO)和头部姿势的即时影响。
进行了一项随机双盲研究。样本组包括48名参与者(n = 48),平均年龄为21±2.47岁(18 - 29岁)。定义了两个亚组:干预组(n = 24),在咬肌和颞肌接受筋膜诱导方案;对照组(n = 24),接受假(安慰剂)干预。测量了咬肌(M1、M2)和颞肌(T1、T2)两个部位的压痛阈值、最大VMO以及通过颅椎角测量的头部姿势。
干预组组内比较显示,颅椎角在参与者坐位时(P <.001;F1,23 = 16.45,R2 = 0.41)和站立位时(P =.012,F1,23 = 7.49,R2 = 0.24)有显著改善,咀嚼肌压痛阈值除M2外也有改善(P =.151;M1:P =.003;F1,23 = 11.34,R2 = 0.33;T1:P =.013,F1,23 = 7.25,R2 = 有显著差异。
与治疗师将手放在颞下颌关节区域但不施加任何治疗压力的安慰剂干预相比,咬肌和颞肌的肌筋膜诱导技术在最大VMO、咀嚼肌机械敏感性和头部姿势方面无显著差异。