Watanabe Yoshinobu, Arai Yukihiro, Takenaka Nobuyuki, Kobayashi Makoto, Matsushita Takashi
Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Teikyo University School of Medicine, 2-11-1 Kaga, Itabashi-ku, Tokyo, 173-8605, Japan,
J Orthop Sci. 2013 Sep;18(5):803-10. doi: 10.1007/s00776-013-0415-0. Epub 2013 Jun 18.
If some predictable factors that affect the treatment results of low-intensity pulsed ultrasound (LIPUS) for delayed union or nonunion could be determined, these might provide us with suggestions for whether LIPUS should be used as an alternative treatment for surgery or an adjuvant therapy after surgery. Therefore, the objective of the present study was to determine what factors affected failure of fracture healing after LIPUS for delayed unions and nonunions.
A one-year observational retrospective cohort study was conducted with a consecutive cohort of 101 delayed unions and 50 nonunions after long bone fractures that were treated with LIPUS between May 1998 and April 2007. The main outcome measure was radiographic determination of osseous bone union status within one year after start of LIPUS therapy. Statistical evaluation was used to recognize predictable factors that affect treatment results of LIPUS for delayed union and nonunion.
Delayed union group (n = 101): Seventy-five delayed unions (74.3%) united without an additional major surgical intervention. Failure of LIPUS therapy was associated with types of nonunion (atrophic/oligotrophic vs. hypertrophic, relative risk 23.72 [95% CI 1.20-11.5], p < 0.01), instability at fracture site (unstable vs. stable, relative risk 3.03 [95% CI 1.67-5.49], p < 0.001), and maximum fracture gap size not less than 9 mm (relative risk 3.30 [95% CI 1.68-6.45]). Nonunion group (n = 50): Thirty-four nonunions (68.0%) united without an additional major surgical intervention. Failure of LIPUS therapy was associated with method of fixation (intramedullary nail vs. others, relative risk 4.50 [95% CI 1.69-12.00], p < 0.001), instability at fracture site (unstable vs. stable, relative risk 4.56 [95% CI 2.20-9.43], p < 0.0001), and maximum fracture gap size not less than 8 mm (relative risk 5.09 [95 % CI 1.65-15.67]).
LIPUS should be applied as an adjuvant therapy in combination with surgical intervention for an established atrophic nonunion with instability and/or with larger fracture gap.
如果能够确定一些影响低强度脉冲超声(LIPUS)治疗骨折延迟愈合或不愈合效果的可预测因素,这些因素可能会为我们提供关于LIPUS是否应作为手术替代治疗或术后辅助治疗的建议。因此,本研究的目的是确定哪些因素会影响LIPUS治疗骨折延迟愈合和不愈合后骨折愈合失败的情况。
对1998年5月至2007年4月期间接受LIPUS治疗的101例长骨骨折延迟愈合患者和50例不愈合患者进行了为期一年的观察性回顾性队列研究。主要观察指标是在开始LIPUS治疗后一年内通过影像学确定骨愈合状态。采用统计学评估来识别影响LIPUS治疗骨折延迟愈合和不愈合效果的可预测因素。
延迟愈合组(n = 101):75例延迟愈合(74.3%)在未进行额外重大手术干预的情况下实现了愈合。LIPUS治疗失败与不愈合类型(萎缩性/营养不足性与肥大性,相对风险23.72 [95%可信区间1.20 - 11.5],p < 0.01)、骨折部位不稳定(不稳定与稳定,相对风险3.03 [95%可信区间1.67 - 5.49],p < 0.001)以及最大骨折间隙尺寸不少于9 mm(相对风险3.30 [95%可信区间1.68 - 6.45])有关。不愈合组(n = 50):34例不愈合(68.0%)在未进行额外重大手术干预的情况下实现了愈合。LIPUS治疗失败与固定方法(髓内钉与其他方法,相对风险4.50 [95%可信区间1.69 - 12.00],p < 0.001)、骨折部位不稳定(不稳定与稳定,相对风险4.56 [95%可信区间2.20 - 9.43],p < 0.0001)以及最大骨折间隙尺寸不少于8 mm(相对风险5.09 [95%可信区间1.65 - 15.67])有关。
对于已确定的伴有不稳定和/或较大骨折间隙的萎缩性不愈合,LIPUS应作为手术干预的辅助治疗方法应用。