Suppr超能文献

低强度脉冲超声(LIPUS)可以减轻骨折不愈合的经济负担。

Low-intensity pulsed ultrasound (LIPUS) can decrease the economic burden of fracture non-union.

作者信息

Mehta Samir, Long Ken, DeKoven Mitch, Smith Elise, Steen R Grant

机构信息

Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of Pennsylvania , Philadelphia, PA , USA.

出版信息

J Med Econ. 2015;18(7):542-9. doi: 10.3111/13696998.2015.1019887. Epub 2015 Mar 18.

Abstract

OBJECTIVES

Few studies have evaluated the economic burden of surgical and conservative treatment of fracture non-union. An analysis was undertaken of aggregated payer data to determine economic costs of non-unions treated with surgery only vs non-unions treated conservatively with low-intensity pulsed ultrasound (LIPUS) only.

METHODS

This study used administrative claims from a health plan database including nearly 80 million people. Patients with a claim for non-union surgery or LIPUS for non-union were identified, from April 2007 until April 2010. A retrospective cohort was formed by pairwise demographic matching among patients who received 'Surgery Only' or 'LIPUS Only'. Date of the first non-union intervention (surgery or LIPUS) was defined as the index date. All medical costs were assessed over 12 months following the index date for the 'Surgery Only' and 'LIPUS Only' cohorts.

RESULTS

A total of 1158 matched patients were identified. 'Surgery Only' patients used significantly more healthcare services. In the year following intervention, 'Surgery Only' patients had total medical costs $6289 higher than 'LIPUS Only' patients (Mean = $11,276 vs $4986; p < 0.0001). Outpatient costs accounted for >68% of overall costs in both cohorts, and outpatient costs were significantly higher among the 'Surgery Only' cohort (Mean = $7682 vs $4196; p < 0.0001). Total inpatient costs were also significantly higher among the 'Surgery Only' cohort (Mean = $3302 vs $381; p < 0.0001).

LIMITATIONS

Limitations of this work are typical of all studies based on administrative claims data: errors in the database are assumed to distribute randomly between cohorts, and some patients may have been miscoded as to treatment received or costs billed.

CONCLUSIONS

'Surgery Only' patients used significantly and substantially more healthcare services in treatment of fracture non-union. Conservative treatment with 'LIPUS only' for fracture non-union could potentially result in cost savings projected to roughly $1 billion dollars [corrected].

摘要

目的

很少有研究评估骨折不愈合手术治疗和保守治疗的经济负担。对聚合支付方数据进行分析,以确定仅接受手术治疗的骨折不愈合与仅接受低强度脉冲超声(LIPUS)保守治疗的骨折不愈合的经济成本。

方法

本研究使用了一个包含近8000万人的健康计划数据库中的管理索赔数据。确定了2007年4月至2010年4月期间有骨折不愈合手术或LIPUS治疗骨折不愈合索赔的患者。通过对接受“仅手术”或“仅LIPUS”治疗的患者进行成对人口统计学匹配,形成了一个回顾性队列。首次骨折不愈合干预(手术或LIPUS)的日期被定义为索引日期。对“仅手术”和“仅LIPUS”队列在索引日期后的12个月内的所有医疗费用进行了评估。

结果

共识别出1158例匹配患者。“仅手术”患者使用的医疗服务显著更多。在干预后的一年中,“仅手术”患者的总医疗费用比“仅LIPUS”患者高6289美元(平均值分别为11276美元和4986美元;p < 0.0001)。两个队列中门诊费用均占总费用的68%以上,且“仅手术”队列的门诊费用显著更高(平均值分别为7682美元和4196美元;p < 0.0001)。“仅手术”队列的总住院费用也显著更高(平均值分别为3302美元和381美元;p < 0.0001)。

局限性

这项研究的局限性是所有基于管理索赔数据的研究共有的:假设数据库中的错误在队列之间随机分布,并且一些患者在接受的治疗或计费成本方面可能编码错误。

结论

“仅手术”患者在治疗骨折不愈合时使用的医疗服务显著更多且大量增加。骨折不愈合的“仅LIPUS”保守治疗可能会节省预计约10亿美元的成本[已修正]。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验