• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

提前通知信增加结直肠癌筛查的成本效益。

Cost-effectiveness of an advance notification letter to increase colorectal cancer screening.

机构信息

Centre for Health Economics Research and Evaluation, Faculty of Business, University of Technology Sydney, NSW, Australia.

出版信息

Int J Technol Assess Health Care. 2013 Jul;29(3):261-8. doi: 10.1017/S0266462313000226. Epub 2013 Jun 19.

DOI:10.1017/S0266462313000226
PMID:23778152
Abstract

OBJECTIVES

The aim of this study is to evaluate the cost-effectiveness of a patient-direct mailed advance notification letter on participants of a National Bowel Cancer Screening Program (NBCSP) in Australia, which was launched in August 2006 and offers free fecal occult blood testing to all Australians turning 50, 55, or 65 years of age in any given year.

METHODS

This study followed a hypothetical cohort of 50-year-old, 55-year-old, and 65-year-old patients undergoing fecal occult blood test (FOBT) screening through a decision analytic Markov model. The intervention compared two strategies: (i) advance letter, NBCSP, and FOBT compared with (ii) NBCSP and FOBT. The main outcome measures were life-years gained (LYG), quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs) gained and incremental cost-effectiveness ratio.

RESULTS

An advance notification screening letter would yield an additional 54 per 100,000 colorectal cancer deaths avoided compared with no letter. The estimated cost-effectiveness was $3,976 per LYG and $6,976 per QALY gained.

CONCLUSIONS

An advance notification letter in the NBCSP may have a significant impact on LYG and cancer deaths avoided. It is cost-effective and offers a feasible strategy that could be rolled out across other screening program at an acceptable cost.

摘要

目的

本研究旨在评估澳大利亚国家肠癌筛查计划(NBCSP)中向参与者直接邮寄预先通知信的成本效益,该计划于 2006 年 8 月启动,为所有年满 50、55 或 65 岁的澳大利亚人提供免费粪便潜血检测。

方法

本研究采用决策分析马尔可夫模型对接受粪便潜血检测(FOBT)筛查的 50 岁、55 岁和 65 岁患者进行了假设队列研究。干预措施比较了两种策略:(i)预先通知信、NBCSP 和 FOBT 与(ii)NBCSP 和 FOBT。主要观察指标为获得的生命年数(LYG)、获得的质量调整生命年数(QALYs)和增量成本效益比。

结果

与没有通知信相比,预先通知筛查信可使每 10 万人结直肠癌死亡人数减少 54 人。估计的成本效益为每获得 1 个生命年 3976 美元,每获得 1 个质量调整生命年 6976 美元。

结论

在 NBCSP 中使用预先通知信可能会对 LYG 和癌症死亡人数的减少产生重大影响。它具有成本效益,并提供了一种可行的策略,可以以可接受的成本在其他筛查计划中推广。

相似文献

1
Cost-effectiveness of an advance notification letter to increase colorectal cancer screening.提前通知信增加结直肠癌筛查的成本效益。
Int J Technol Assess Health Care. 2013 Jul;29(3):261-8. doi: 10.1017/S0266462313000226. Epub 2013 Jun 19.
2
Health benefits and cost-effectiveness of a hybrid screening strategy for colorectal cancer.结直肠癌混合筛查策略的健康获益和成本效益。
Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2013 Sep;11(9):1158-66. doi: 10.1016/j.cgh.2013.03.013. Epub 2013 Mar 28.
3
Comparative effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of screening colonoscopy vs. sigmoidoscopy and alternative strategies.筛查结肠镜检查与乙状结肠镜检查和其他策略的比较效果和成本效益。
Am J Gastroenterol. 2013 Jan;108(1):120-32. doi: 10.1038/ajg.2012.380. Epub 2012 Dec 18.
4
Cost-effectiveness of screening for colorectal cancer in France using a guaiac test versus an immunochemical test.法国使用愈创木脂测试与免疫化学测试筛查结直肠癌的成本效益比较。
Int J Technol Assess Health Care. 2010 Jan;26(1):40-7. doi: 10.1017/S026646230999078X.
5
Advance notification letters increase adherence in colorectal cancer screening: a population-based randomized trial.提前通知信可提高结直肠癌筛查的依从性:一项基于人群的随机试验。
Prev Med. 2011 Jun;52(6):448-51. doi: 10.1016/j.ypmed.2011.01.032. Epub 2011 Mar 30.
6
Cost-effectiveness simulation and analysis of colorectal cancer screening in Hong Kong Chinese population: comparison amongst colonoscopy, guaiac and immunologic fecal occult blood testing.香港华人人群中结直肠癌筛查的成本效益模拟与分析:结肠镜检查、愈创木脂法和免疫粪便潜血检测的比较
BMC Cancer. 2015 Oct 15;15:705. doi: 10.1186/s12885-015-1730-y.
7
Cost-effectiveness analysis on screening for colorectal neoplasm and management of colorectal cancer in Asia.亚洲结直肠肿瘤筛查及结直肠癌管理的成本效益分析
Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 2008 Aug 1;28(3):353-63. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2036.2008.03726.x.
8
Cost effectiveness and projected national impact of colorectal cancer screening in France.法国结直肠癌筛查的成本效益和预期的全国影响。
Endoscopy. 2011 Sep;43(9):780-93. doi: 10.1055/s-0030-1256409. Epub 2011 May 27.
9
Comparison of mailed invitation strategies to improve fecal occult blood test participation in men: protocol for a randomized controlled trial.邮寄邀请策略对提高男性粪便潜血试验参与率的比较:一项随机对照试验方案。
Trials. 2013 Jul 31;14:239. doi: 10.1186/1745-6215-14-239.
10
Cost-effectiveness modeling of colorectal cancer: computed tomography colonography vs colonoscopy or fecal occult blood tests.结直肠癌的成本效益建模:计算机断层结肠成像与结肠镜检查或粪便潜血试验比较。
Eur J Radiol. 2012 Jul;81(7):1413-9. doi: 10.1016/j.ejrad.2011.03.027. Epub 2011 Mar 27.

引用本文的文献

1
Simulation modeling validity and utility in colorectal cancer screening delivery: A systematic review.模拟建模在结直肠癌筛查中的有效性和实用性:系统评价。
J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2020 Jun 1;27(6):908-916. doi: 10.1093/jamia/ocaa022.
2
Pre-notification and reminder SMS text messages with behaviourally informed invitation letters to improve uptake of NHS Health Checks: a factorial randomised controlled trial.行为信息邀请信的预通知和提醒短信以提高国民保健制度健康检查的参与率:一项析因随机对照试验。
BMC Public Health. 2019 Aug 22;19(1):1162. doi: 10.1186/s12889-019-7476-8.
3
Quantifying Queensland patients with cancer health service usage and costs: study protocol.
量化昆士兰癌症患者的医疗服务使用情况及费用:研究方案
BMJ Open. 2017 Jan 24;7(1):e014030. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2016-014030.
4
Comparative effectiveness of two outreach strategies for cervical cancer screening.两种宫颈癌筛查外展策略的比较效果
Prev Med. 2016 May;86:19-27. doi: 10.1016/j.ypmed.2016.01.016. Epub 2016 Jan 25.
5
Reasons for non-participation in the Northern Ireland Bowel Cancer Screening Programme: a qualitative study.不参与北爱尔兰肠癌筛查计划的原因:一项定性研究。
BMJ Open. 2015 Sep 9;5(9):e008266. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2015-008266.