• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

提前通知信可提高结直肠癌筛查的依从性:一项基于人群的随机试验。

Advance notification letters increase adherence in colorectal cancer screening: a population-based randomized trial.

机构信息

Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Erasmus University Medical Centre,'s Gravendijkwal 230, 3015 CE Rotterdam, The Netherlands.

出版信息

Prev Med. 2011 Jun;52(6):448-51. doi: 10.1016/j.ypmed.2011.01.032. Epub 2011 Mar 30.

DOI:10.1016/j.ypmed.2011.01.032
PMID:21457725
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

The population benefit of screening depends not only on the effectiveness of the test, but also on adherence, which, for colorectal cancer (CRC) screening remains low. An advance notification letter may increase adherence, however, no population-based randomized trials have been conducted to provide evidence of this.

METHOD

In 2008, a representative sample of the Dutch population (aged 50-74 years) was randomized. All 2493 invitees in group A were sent an advance notification letter, followed two weeks later by a standard invitation. The 2507 invitees in group B only received the standard invitation. Non-respondents in both groups were sent a reminder 6 weeks after the invitation.

RESULTS

The advance notification letters resulted in a significantly higher adherence (64.4% versus 61.1%, p-value 0.019). Multivariate logistic regression analysis showed no significant interactions between group and age, sex, or socio-economic status. Cost analysis showed that the incremental cost per additional detected advanced neoplasia due to sending an advance notification letter was € 957.

CONCLUSION

This population-based randomized trial demonstrates that sending an advance notification letter significantly increases adherence by 3.3%. The incremental cost per additional detected advanced neoplasia is acceptable. We therefore recommend that such letters are incorporated within the standard CRC-screening invitation process.

摘要

目的

筛查的人群获益不仅取决于检测的有效性,还取决于依从性,而结直肠癌(CRC)筛查的依从性仍然较低。预先通知信可能会提高依从性,但是,尚未进行基于人群的随机试验来提供这方面的证据。

方法

2008 年,对荷兰代表性人群(年龄在 50-74 岁)进行了随机分组。A 组中的所有 2493 名受邀者都收到了预先通知信,两周后再收到标准邀请。B 组中的 2507 名受邀者仅收到标准邀请。两组中的未回复者在邀请后 6 周都会收到提醒。

结果

预先通知信导致依从性显著提高(64.4%比 61.1%,p 值<0.019)。多变量逻辑回归分析显示,组与年龄、性别或社会经济地位之间没有显著的相互作用。成本分析表明,由于发送预先通知信而导致每增加一个检测到的高级肿瘤的增量成本为 957 欧元。

结论

这项基于人群的随机试验表明,发送预先通知信可使依从性显著提高 3.3%。每增加一个检测到的高级肿瘤的增量成本是可以接受的。因此,我们建议将此类信件纳入 CRC 筛查的标准邀请流程中。

相似文献

1
Advance notification letters increase adherence in colorectal cancer screening: a population-based randomized trial.提前通知信可提高结直肠癌筛查的依从性:一项基于人群的随机试验。
Prev Med. 2011 Jun;52(6):448-51. doi: 10.1016/j.ypmed.2011.01.032. Epub 2011 Mar 30.
2
An advance notification letter increases participation in colorectal cancer screening.提前通知信可提高结直肠癌筛查的参与率。
J Med Screen. 2007;14(2):73-5. doi: 10.1258/096914107781261927.
3
Cost-effectiveness of an advance notification letter to increase colorectal cancer screening.提前通知信增加结直肠癌筛查的成本效益。
Int J Technol Assess Health Care. 2013 Jul;29(3):261-8. doi: 10.1017/S0266462313000226. Epub 2013 Jun 19.
4
Cost-effectiveness of targeted and tailored interventions on colorectal cancer screening use.针对性和个性化干预措施对结直肠癌筛查应用的成本效益
Cancer. 2008 Feb 15;112(4):779-88. doi: 10.1002/cncr.23232.
5
A randomized controlled trial of the impact of targeted and tailored interventions on colorectal cancer screening.一项关于针对性和个性化干预对结直肠癌筛查影响的随机对照试验。
Cancer. 2007 Nov 1;110(9):2083-91. doi: 10.1002/cncr.23022.
6
[Colorectal cancer screening: advice from the Health Council of the Netherlands].[结直肠癌筛查:荷兰健康委员会的建议]
Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd. 2009;153:A1441.
7
Direct mailing of faecal occult blood tests for colorectal cancer screening: a randomized population study from Central Italy.直接邮寄粪便隐血试验用于结直肠癌筛查:来自意大利中部的一项随机人群研究。
J Med Screen. 2011;18(3):121-7. doi: 10.1258/jms.2011.011009.
8
Taishotoyama Symposium Barriers to colorectal cancer screening: economics, capacity and adherence.太白山研讨会:结直肠癌筛查的障碍——经济学、能力与依从性
J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2008 Dec;23 Suppl 2:S198-204. doi: 10.1111/j.1440-1746.2008.05556.x.
9
Costs and cost effectiveness of a health care provider-directed intervention to promote colorectal cancer screening among Veterans.一项由医疗服务提供者主导的促进退伍军人进行结直肠癌筛查干预措施的成本及成本效益
J Clin Oncol. 2005 Dec 1;23(34):8877-83. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2005.02.6278.
10
Theory-based modifications of an advanced notification letter improves screening for bowel cancer in men: A randomised controlled trial.基于理论对提前通知信进行修改可改善男性结直肠癌筛查:一项随机对照试验。
Soc Sci Med. 2016 Sep;165:1-9. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2016.06.036. Epub 2016 Jul 1.

引用本文的文献

1
Colorectal cancer prevalence in faecal immunochemical test non-returners: potential for health inequality in symptomatic referral pathways.粪便免疫化学试验未返回者中的结直肠癌患病率:症状转诊途径中健康不平等的潜在风险。
BJS Open. 2024 Sep 3;8(5). doi: 10.1093/bjsopen/zrae119.
2
A Postcard Primer Prior to Mailed Fecal Immunochemical Test Among Veterans: a Randomized Controlled Trial.邮寄粪便免疫化学试验前的明信片初步研究:一项随机对照试验。
J Gen Intern Med. 2023 Nov;38(14):3235-3241. doi: 10.1007/s11606-023-08248-7. Epub 2023 Jun 8.
3
What can We Learn From High-Performing Screening Programs to Increase Bowel Cancer Screening Participation in Australia?
从表现优异的筛查项目中,我们可以学到哪些经验来提高澳大利亚的结直肠癌筛查参与率?
Cancer Control. 2022 Jan-Dec;29:10732748221121383. doi: 10.1177/10732748221121383.
4
Effect of Patient Portal Messaging Before Mailing Fecal Immunochemical Test Kit on Colorectal Cancer Screening Rates: A Randomized Clinical Trial.患者门户消息传递对邮寄粪便免疫化学检测试剂盒前后对结直肠癌筛查率的影响:一项随机临床试验。
JAMA Netw Open. 2022 Feb 1;5(2):e2146863. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2021.46863.
5
The Effects of Different Invitation Schemes on the Use of Fecal Occult Blood Tests for Colorectal Cancer Screening: Systematic Review of Randomized Controlled Trials.不同邀请方案对粪便潜血试验用于结直肠癌筛查的影响:随机对照试验的系统评价
Cancers (Basel). 2021 Mar 25;13(7):1520. doi: 10.3390/cancers13071520.
6
Selection of patients for large mailed fecal immunochemical test colorectal cancer screening outreach programs: A systematic review.大规模邮寄粪便免疫化学试验用于结直肠癌筛查外展项目的患者选择:系统评价。
J Med Screen. 2021 Dec;28(4):379-388. doi: 10.1177/0969141321997482. Epub 2021 Mar 8.
7
Implementation Strategies for Interventions Aiming to Increase Participation in Mail-Out Bowel Cancer Screening Programs: A Realist Review.旨在提高邮寄式肠癌筛查项目参与率的干预措施实施策略:一项实效主义综述
Front Oncol. 2020 Sep 29;10:543732. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2020.543732. eCollection 2020.
8
The Effects of Differing Invitation Models on the Uptake of Immunological Fecal Occult Blood Testing.不同邀请模式对免疫粪便隐血检测参与率的影响。
Dtsch Arztebl Int. 2020 Jun 19;117(25):423-430. doi: 10.3238/arztebl.2020.0423.
9
Advanced Notification Calls Prior to Mailed Fecal Immunochemical Test in Previously Screened Patients: a Randomized Controlled Trial.邮寄粪便免疫化学试验前对既往筛查患者进行高级通知电话:一项随机对照试验。
J Gen Intern Med. 2020 Oct;35(10):2858-2864. doi: 10.1007/s11606-020-06009-4. Epub 2020 Aug 3.
10
Randomized Controlled Trial of Advance Notification Phone Calls vs Text Messages Prior to Mailed Fecal Test Outreach.随机对照试验:在邮寄粪便检测外展之前,电话通知与短信通知的效果比较。
Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2021 Nov;19(11):2353-2360.e2. doi: 10.1016/j.cgh.2020.07.053. Epub 2020 Jul 30.