Suppr超能文献

随机对照试验比较早期家庭生物反馈物理治疗与骨盆底运动治疗三度撕裂伤(EBAPT 试验)。

Randomised controlled trial comparing early home biofeedback physiotherapy with pelvic floor exercises for the treatment of third-degree tears (EBAPT Trial).

机构信息

National Maternity Hospital, Dublin, Ireland.

出版信息

BJOG. 2013 Sep;120(10):1240-7; discussion 1246. doi: 10.1111/1471-0528.12194. Epub 2013 Jun 19.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To compare early home biofeedback physiotherapy with pelvic floor exercises (PFEs) for the initial management of women sustaining a primary third-degree tear.

DESIGN

Single centre, randomised trial.

SETTING

National Maternity Hospital, Dublin, Ireland.

POPULATION

A total of 120 women sustaining a primary third-degree tear.

METHODS

Women were randomised in a one to three ratio: 30 to early postpartum home biofeedback physiotherapy and 90 to PFEs.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Differences in anorectal manometry results, Cleveland Clinic continence scores and Rockwood faecal incontinence quality of life scale scores after 3 months of postpartum treatment.

RESULTS

The mean anal resting pressure was 39 ± 13 mmHg in the early biofeedback physiotherapy group and 43 ± 17 mmHg in the PFE group. The mean anal squeeze pressure was 64 ± 17 mmHg in the biofeedback group and 62 ± 23 mmHg in the PFE group. There was no significant difference in anal resting and squeeze pressure values between the groups (P = 0.123 and P = 0.68, respectively). There were no differences in symptom score and quality of life measurements between the groups.

CONCLUSIONS

This study demonstrates no added value in using early home biofeedback physiotherapy in the management of women sustaining third-degree tears. Poor compliance may have contributed because women found it difficult to designate time to using biofeedback.

摘要

目的

比较产后早期家庭生物反馈物理治疗与骨盆底运动(PFEs)对初次发生三度会阴撕裂的女性的初始管理效果。

设计

单中心、随机试验。

地点

爱尔兰都柏林国家妇产医院。

人群

共有 120 名初次发生三度会阴撕裂的女性。

方法

将女性随机分为三组,比例为 1:3:30 名接受产后早期家庭生物反馈物理治疗,90 名接受 PFEs。

主要观察指标

产后 3 个月治疗后肛门直肠测压结果、克利夫兰临床失禁评分和 Rockwood 粪便失禁生活质量量表评分的差异。

结果

早期生物反馈物理治疗组的平均肛门静息压力为 39±13mmHg,PFEs 组为 43±17mmHg。生物反馈组的平均肛门收缩压为 64±17mmHg,PFEs 组为 62±23mmHg。两组的肛门静息和收缩压值无显著差异(P=0.123 和 P=0.68)。组间症状评分和生活质量测量无差异。

结论

本研究表明,在三度会阴撕裂的管理中,产后早期家庭生物反馈物理治疗没有额外价值。由于女性发现很难专门安排时间使用生物反馈,因此可能是由于依从性差导致。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验