School of Sport, Exercise and Health Sciences, Loughborough University, Leicestershire, England, UNITED KINGDOM.
Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2014 Jan;46(1):52-9. doi: 10.1249/MSS.0b013e3182a0537b.
This investigation quantified the effect of changes in plasma osmolality on the measurement of hematocrit (Hct) and the implications for the subsequent use of these data to calculate changes in plasma volume and application to the World Anti-Doping Agency Athlete Biological Passport.
Two groups of eight male volunteers visited the laboratory after an overnight fast. In study 1, a 20-mL blood sample was collected and aliquoted into collection tubes containing saline of varying concentrations to alter the sample osmolality. In study 2, plasma osmolality was manipulated in vivo through prolonged exercise. Samples were analyzed for hemoglobin concentration and Hct using manual methods and using an automated hematology analyzer (AHA).
Changes in blood, plasma, and red cell volumes were calculated. Although AHA Hct values did not change (P = 0.652), spun packed cell volume fell progressively as the osmolality of the sample increased (P < 0.001, study 1). Consequently, there was a significant increase in apparent plasma volume as osmolality increased (P < 0.001): regression analysis revealed that a 10 mOsm·kg change in plasma osmolality produced a difference of 0.8 Hct units and a 1.6% change in plasma volume. In study 2, exercise produced a 12 ± 3 mOsm·kg increase in plasma osmolality. No difference in Hct was apparent at rest (P = 0.659), but spun packed cell volume was 1.0 ± 0.9 Hct units lower during exercise compared with AHA data (P < 0.001). There was a difference in the degree of plasma volume change calculated, with a reduction of 8.7% ± 3.4% and 11.3% ± 3.5% reported with the manual and AHA methods, respectively (P = 0.002).
Conditions or interventions that result in a marked change in plasma osmolality produce a discrepancy in Hct measured using an AHA, consequently introducing errors into any calculation of changes in plasma volume using these data. These findings may also have implications for the measurement of Hct by World Anti-Doping Agency-accredited laboratories.
本研究定量评估了血浆渗透压变化对红细胞压积(Hct)测量的影响,并探讨了将这些数据用于计算血浆容量变化以及应用于世界反兴奋剂机构运动员生物护照的意义。
两组 8 名男性志愿者在禁食过夜后前往实验室。在研究 1 中,采集 20 毫升血样并等分至含有不同浓度生理盐水的采血管中,以改变样本渗透压。在研究 2 中,通过长时间运动来改变体内血浆渗透压。使用手动方法和自动血液分析仪(AHA)分析血红蛋白浓度和 Hct。
计算了血液、血浆和红细胞体积的变化。尽管 AHA 测定的 Hct 值没有变化(P=0.652),但随着样本渗透压的增加,离心后红细胞压积逐渐下降(P<0.001,研究 1)。因此,随着渗透压的增加,表观血浆容量显著增加(P<0.001):回归分析显示,血浆渗透压升高 10 mOsm·kg 会导致 Hct 差值为 0.8 个单位,血浆容量变化 1.6%。在研究 2 中,运动使血浆渗透压升高 12±3 mOsm·kg。在静息状态下,Hct 无明显差异(P=0.659),但与 AHA 数据相比,运动时离心后红细胞压积低 1.0±0.9 Hct 单位(P<0.001)。两种方法计算的血浆容量变化程度存在差异,使用手动法和 AHA 法分别报告的血浆容量减少 8.7%±3.4%和 11.3%±3.5%(P=0.002)。
导致血浆渗透压显著变化的情况或干预措施会导致使用 AHA 测量的 Hct 出现差异,从而导致使用这些数据计算的血浆容量变化出现误差。这些发现可能对世界反兴奋剂机构认可实验室测量 Hct 也有影响。