Suppr超能文献

非左前降支冠状动脉中桡动脉与隐静脉或右内乳动脉旁路移植桥的有效性的系统比较。

Systematic comparison of the effectiveness of radial artery and saphenous vein or right internal thoracic artery coronary bypass grafts in non-left anterior descending coronary arteries.

机构信息

Department of Cardiac Surgery, Ruijin Hospital, School of Medicine, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai, China.

出版信息

J Zhejiang Univ Sci B. 2011 Apr;12(4):273-9. doi: 10.1631/jzus.B1000241.

Abstract

Coronary artery bypass grafting surgery is increasingly being carried out on patients with multi-vessel coronary artery disease, but the best grafting candidate for non-left anterior descending coronary arteries is unclear. This research sought to systematically compare the efficacies and safeties of coronary bypass with radial artery and other available grafts. A systematic literature retrieval was performed for all clinical trials comparing the outcomes of coronary artery bypass surgery with radial artery and other grafts in PubMed, EMBASE, and the Cochrane Library. Seven eligible clinical studies, comparing radial artery and great saphenous vein grafts, were found between 1966 and 2010: one prospective non-randomized and six prospective randomized trials. The pooling analysis obtained a relative risk of 0.507 (P<0.05) of graft occlusion in radial arteries compared with great saphenous veins. There was a significantly lower infection rate in arms (i.e., harvest sites for radial arteries) relative to legs (harvest sites for veins), with a pooled relative risk of 0.140 (P<0.05). From the reports on mortality after follow-up ranging from one year to six years, there was no significant difference in mortality between the two graft types (P=0.927). In addition, four cohort controlled trials for radial and right internal thoracic artery grafts were included. The radial graft was associated with less cardiac related events relative to the right internal thoracic artery graft (P=0.014), but with comparable mortality and comparable rates of repeat percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty. Subjects with radial arteries seemed to have a lower occlusion rate and a lower graft harvest site infection rate than those with great saphenous veins. Moreover there were fewer cardiac related events with radial arteries relative to the right internal thoracic artery grafts. More studies are needed to confirm these findings concerning the favorable outcomes of coronary artery bypass grafting with radial arteries on long-term patency and mortality.

摘要

冠状动脉旁路移植术(CABG)越来越多地应用于多支冠状动脉疾病患者,但非左前降支冠状动脉的最佳移植候选者尚不清楚。本研究旨在系统比较冠状动脉旁路移植术采用桡动脉和其他可用移植物的疗效和安全性。在 PubMed、EMBASE 和 Cochrane Library 中对比较桡动脉与大隐静脉旁路移植术结果的所有临床试验进行了系统文献检索。1966 年至 2010 年期间发现了 7 项比较桡动脉和大隐静脉旁路移植术的合格临床研究:1 项前瞻性非随机研究和 6 项前瞻性随机研究。荟萃分析得到桡动脉与大隐静脉相比,桥血管闭塞的相对风险为 0.507(P<0.05)。与腿部(静脉采集部位)相比,手臂(桡动脉采集部位)的感染率显著降低,合并相对风险为 0.140(P<0.05)。从随访 1 年至 6 年的死亡率报告来看,两种移植物类型之间死亡率无显著差异(P=0.927)。此外,还纳入了 4 项桡动脉和右内乳动脉移植物的队列对照试验。与右内乳动脉移植物相比,桡动脉移植物与较少的心脏相关事件相关(P=0.014),但死亡率和再次经皮腔内冠状动脉成形术的发生率相当。与大隐静脉相比,桡动脉的闭塞率和移植部位感染率较低,心脏相关事件也较少。还需要更多的研究来证实这些关于桡动脉冠状动脉旁路移植术在长期通畅率和死亡率方面的有利结果的发现。

相似文献

8
Arterial grafts do not counteract target vessel occlusion.动脉移植物并不能对抗靶血管闭塞。
Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2013 Nov;44(5):e320-4. doi: 10.1093/ejcts/ezt417. Epub 2013 Aug 16.

引用本文的文献

2
The Use of Radial Artery for CABG: An Update.桡动脉在冠状动脉旁路移植术中的应用:更新。
Biomed Res Int. 2021 Apr 7;2021:5528006. doi: 10.1155/2021/5528006. eCollection 2021.
5
Current status of arterial grafts for coronary artery bypass grafting.冠状动脉旁路移植术用动脉移植物的现状。
Ann Cardiothorac Surg. 2013 Jul;2(4):427-30. doi: 10.3978/j.issn.2225-319X.2013.07.21.

本文引用的文献

2
Long-term patency of 1108 radial arterial-coronary angiograms over 10 years.1108例桡动脉冠状动脉造影10年的长期通畅情况。
Ann Thorac Surg. 2009 Jul;88(1):23-9; discussion 29-30. doi: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2009.03.086.
7
Does the radial artery provide better long-term patency than the saphenous vein?桡动脉的长期通畅性是否优于大隐静脉?
Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg. 2005 Aug;4(4):304-10. doi: 10.1510/icvts.2005.107490. Epub 2005 Apr 18.
9

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验