• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

接受紧急医疗服务进行脊柱固定的患者的背板使用时间。

Backboard time for patients receiving spinal immobilization by emergency medical services.

作者信息

Cooney Derek R, Wallus Harry, Asaly Michael, Wojcik Susan

机构信息

Department of Emergency Medicine, SUNY Upstate Medical University, 550 East Genesee / EMSTAT Center, Syracuse, NY, 13202, USA.

出版信息

Int J Emerg Med. 2013 Jun 20;6(1):17. doi: 10.1186/1865-1380-6-17.

DOI:10.1186/1865-1380-6-17
PMID:23786995
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3691613/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Use of backboards as part of routine trauma care has recently come into question because of the lack of data to support their effectiveness. Multiple authors have noted the potential harm associated with backboard use, including iatrogenic pain, skin ulceration, increased use of radiographic studies, aspiration and respiratory compromise. An observational study was performed at a level 1 academic trauma center to determine the total and interval backboard times for patients arriving via emergency medical services (EMS).

FINDINGS

Patients were directly observed. Transport time was recorded as an estimate of initiation of backboard use; arrival time, nurse report time and time of removal from the backboard were all recorded. National Emergency Department Overcrowding Study (NEDOCS) score, Emergency Severity Index (ESI) and demographic information were recorded for each patient encounter. Forty-six patients were followed. The mean total backboard time was 54 min (SD ±65). The mean EMS interval was 33 min (SD ±64), and the mean ED interval was 21 min (SD ±15). The ED backboard interval trended inversely to ESI (1 = 5 min, 2 = 10 min, 3 = 25 min, 4 = 26 min, 5 = 32 min).

CONCLUSION

Patients had a mean total backboard time of around an hour. The mean EMS interval was greater than the mean ED interval. Further study with a larger sample directed to establishing associated factors and to target possible reduction strategies is warranted.

摘要

背景

由于缺乏数据支持其有效性,将背板用作常规创伤护理的一部分最近受到质疑。多位作者指出了与使用背板相关的潜在危害,包括医源性疼痛、皮肤溃疡、增加影像学检查的使用、误吸和呼吸功能受损。在一家一级学术创伤中心进行了一项观察性研究,以确定通过紧急医疗服务(EMS)送达的患者使用背板的总时长和间隔时长。

研究结果

对患者进行直接观察。记录转运时间作为使用背板起始时间的估计值;记录到达时间、护士报告时间和从背板上移除的时间。记录每次患者就诊的国家急诊科拥挤度研究(NEDOCS)评分、急诊严重程度指数(ESI)和人口统计学信息。共跟踪了46名患者。背板总平均时长为54分钟(标准差±65)。EMS平均间隔为33分钟(标准差±64),急诊室平均间隔为21分钟(标准差±15)。急诊室背板间隔与ESI呈负相关趋势(1级=5分钟,2级=10分钟,3级=25分钟,4级=26分钟,5级=32分钟)。

结论

患者背板总平均时长约为一小时。EMS平均间隔大于急诊室平均间隔。有必要进行更大样本量的进一步研究,以确定相关因素并制定可能的减少策略。

相似文献

1
Backboard time for patients receiving spinal immobilization by emergency medical services.接受紧急医疗服务进行脊柱固定的患者的背板使用时间。
Int J Emerg Med. 2013 Jun 20;6(1):17. doi: 10.1186/1865-1380-6-17.
2
Compulsory Use of the Backboard is Associated with Increased Frequency of Thoracolumbar Imaging.强制使用背板与胸腰椎成像频率增加有关。
Prehosp Emerg Care. 2018 Jul-Aug;22(4):506-510. doi: 10.1080/10903127.2017.1413465. Epub 2018 Feb 15.
3
Duration of patient immobilization in the ED.患者在急诊科的固定时间。
Am J Emerg Med. 2000 Jan;18(1):28-30. doi: 10.1016/s0735-6757(00)90043-3.
4
EMS spinal precautions and the use of the long backboard - resource document to the position statement of the National Association of EMS Physicians and the American College of Surgeons Committee on Trauma.紧急医疗服务(EMS)脊柱保护措施及长背板的使用——美国紧急医疗服务医师协会和美国外科医师学会创伤委员会立场声明的参考文件
Prehosp Emerg Care. 2014 Apr-Jun;18(2):306-14. doi: 10.3109/10903127.2014.884197. Epub 2014 Feb 21.
5
Comparison of a vacuum splint device to a rigid backboard for spinal immobilization.用于脊柱固定的真空夹板装置与刚性背板的比较。
Am J Emerg Med. 1996 Jul;14(4):369-72. doi: 10.1016/S0735-6757(96)90051-0.
6
EMS Providers' Beliefs Regarding Spinal Precautions for Pediatric Trauma Transport.急救医疗服务人员关于小儿创伤转运脊柱保护措施的看法。
Prehosp Emerg Care. 2017 May-Jun;21(3):344-353. doi: 10.1080/10903127.2016.1254696. Epub 2016 Dec 5.
7
Emergency Medical Services Utilization in EMS Priority Conditions in Beirut, Lebanon.黎巴嫩贝鲁特紧急医疗服务优先条件下的紧急医疗服务利用情况
Prehosp Disaster Med. 2016 Dec;31(6):621-627. doi: 10.1017/S1049023X16000972. Epub 2016 Sep 19.
8
The effect of trauma backboards on computed tomography radiation dose.创伤固定板对计算机断层扫描辐射剂量的影响。
Clin Radiol. 2016 May;71(5):499.e1-8. doi: 10.1016/j.crad.2016.01.006. Epub 2016 Feb 28.
9
Spinal Backboard-Necessity or Hazard? The IDF Clinical Practice Guidelines and Policy.脊柱背板:必需品还是危险物?IDF 临床实践指南与政策。
Mil Med. 2023 Jul 22;188(7-8):e1781-e1787. doi: 10.1093/milmed/usac279.
10
Emergency Resuscitation of Patients Enrolled in the US Diaspirin Cross-linked Hemoglobin (DCLHb) Clinical Efficacy Trial.参与美国双阿司匹林交联血红蛋白(DCLHb)临床疗效试验患者的紧急复苏
Prehosp Disaster Med. 2015 Feb;30(1):54-61. doi: 10.1017/S1049023X14001174. Epub 2014 Dec 15.

引用本文的文献

1
The multicenter impacts of an emergency physician lead on departmental flow and provider experiences.急诊医师主导对科室流程和医护人员体验的多中心影响。
CJEM. 2023 Mar;25(3):224-232. doi: 10.1007/s43678-023-00459-5. Epub 2023 Feb 15.
2
Prehospital care of spinal injuries: a historical quest for reasoning and evidence.院前脊柱损伤救治:推理与证据的历史探索。
Eur Spine J. 2018 Dec;27(12):2999-3006. doi: 10.1007/s00586-018-5762-2. Epub 2018 Sep 15.

本文引用的文献

1
Evaluation of the safety of C-spine clearance by paramedics: design and methodology.评估急救人员进行颈椎清除术的安全性:设计与方法。
BMC Emerg Med. 2011 Feb 1;11:1. doi: 10.1186/1471-227X-11-1.
2
Pre-hospital care management of a potential spinal cord injured patient: a systematic review of the literature and evidence-based guidelines.院前潜在脊髓损伤患者的护理管理:文献系统评价和循证指南。
J Neurotrauma. 2011 Aug;28(8):1341-61. doi: 10.1089/neu.2009.1168. Epub 2010 Jun 16.
3
Spine immobilization in penetrating trauma: more harm than good?穿透性创伤中的脊柱固定:弊大于利?
J Trauma. 2010 Jan;68(1):115-20; discussion 120-1. doi: 10.1097/TA.0b013e3181c9ee58.
4
Changes in physical examination caused by use of spinal immobilization.使用脊柱固定装置引起的体格检查变化。
Prehosp Emerg Care. 2002 Oct-Dec;6(4):421-4. doi: 10.1080/10903120290938067.
5
The effects of rigid collar placement on intracranial and cerebral perfusion pressures.硬质颈托放置对颅内压和脑灌注压的影响。
Anaesthesia. 2001 Jun;56(6):511-3. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2044.2001.02053.x.
6
Can an out-of-hospital cervical spine clearance protocol identify all patients with injuries? An argument for selective immobilization.院外颈椎清除方案能否识别所有受伤患者?支持选择性固定的观点。
Ann Emerg Med. 2001 Jun;37(6):609-15. doi: 10.1067/mem.2001.114409.
7
The use of the spinal board after the pre-hospital phase of trauma management.创伤院前管理阶段后脊柱板的使用。
Emerg Med J. 2001 Jan;18(1):51-4. doi: 10.1136/emj.18.1.51.
8
Duration of patient immobilization in the ED.患者在急诊科的固定时间。
Am J Emerg Med. 2000 Jan;18(1):28-30. doi: 10.1016/s0735-6757(00)90043-3.
9
Paramedic use of a spinal injury clearance algorithm reduces spinal immobilization in the out-of-hospital setting.
Prehosp Emerg Care. 1999 Jan-Mar;3(1):1-6. doi: 10.1080/10903129908958895.
10
The effects of neutral positioning with and without padding on spinal immobilization of healthy subjects.有衬垫和无衬垫中立位对健康受试者脊柱固定的影响。
Prehosp Emerg Care. 1998 Apr-Jun;2(2):112-6. doi: 10.1080/10903129808958853.