Suppr超能文献

接受紧急医疗服务进行脊柱固定的患者的背板使用时间。

Backboard time for patients receiving spinal immobilization by emergency medical services.

作者信息

Cooney Derek R, Wallus Harry, Asaly Michael, Wojcik Susan

机构信息

Department of Emergency Medicine, SUNY Upstate Medical University, 550 East Genesee / EMSTAT Center, Syracuse, NY, 13202, USA.

出版信息

Int J Emerg Med. 2013 Jun 20;6(1):17. doi: 10.1186/1865-1380-6-17.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Use of backboards as part of routine trauma care has recently come into question because of the lack of data to support their effectiveness. Multiple authors have noted the potential harm associated with backboard use, including iatrogenic pain, skin ulceration, increased use of radiographic studies, aspiration and respiratory compromise. An observational study was performed at a level 1 academic trauma center to determine the total and interval backboard times for patients arriving via emergency medical services (EMS).

FINDINGS

Patients were directly observed. Transport time was recorded as an estimate of initiation of backboard use; arrival time, nurse report time and time of removal from the backboard were all recorded. National Emergency Department Overcrowding Study (NEDOCS) score, Emergency Severity Index (ESI) and demographic information were recorded for each patient encounter. Forty-six patients were followed. The mean total backboard time was 54 min (SD ±65). The mean EMS interval was 33 min (SD ±64), and the mean ED interval was 21 min (SD ±15). The ED backboard interval trended inversely to ESI (1 = 5 min, 2 = 10 min, 3 = 25 min, 4 = 26 min, 5 = 32 min).

CONCLUSION

Patients had a mean total backboard time of around an hour. The mean EMS interval was greater than the mean ED interval. Further study with a larger sample directed to establishing associated factors and to target possible reduction strategies is warranted.

摘要

背景

由于缺乏数据支持其有效性,将背板用作常规创伤护理的一部分最近受到质疑。多位作者指出了与使用背板相关的潜在危害,包括医源性疼痛、皮肤溃疡、增加影像学检查的使用、误吸和呼吸功能受损。在一家一级学术创伤中心进行了一项观察性研究,以确定通过紧急医疗服务(EMS)送达的患者使用背板的总时长和间隔时长。

研究结果

对患者进行直接观察。记录转运时间作为使用背板起始时间的估计值;记录到达时间、护士报告时间和从背板上移除的时间。记录每次患者就诊的国家急诊科拥挤度研究(NEDOCS)评分、急诊严重程度指数(ESI)和人口统计学信息。共跟踪了46名患者。背板总平均时长为54分钟(标准差±65)。EMS平均间隔为33分钟(标准差±64),急诊室平均间隔为21分钟(标准差±15)。急诊室背板间隔与ESI呈负相关趋势(1级=5分钟,2级=10分钟,3级=25分钟,4级=26分钟,5级=32分钟)。

结论

患者背板总平均时长约为一小时。EMS平均间隔大于急诊室平均间隔。有必要进行更大样本量的进一步研究,以确定相关因素并制定可能的减少策略。

相似文献

1
Backboard time for patients receiving spinal immobilization by emergency medical services.
Int J Emerg Med. 2013 Jun 20;6(1):17. doi: 10.1186/1865-1380-6-17.
2
Compulsory Use of the Backboard is Associated with Increased Frequency of Thoracolumbar Imaging.
Prehosp Emerg Care. 2018 Jul-Aug;22(4):506-510. doi: 10.1080/10903127.2017.1413465. Epub 2018 Feb 15.
3
Duration of patient immobilization in the ED.
Am J Emerg Med. 2000 Jan;18(1):28-30. doi: 10.1016/s0735-6757(00)90043-3.
5
Comparison of a vacuum splint device to a rigid backboard for spinal immobilization.
Am J Emerg Med. 1996 Jul;14(4):369-72. doi: 10.1016/S0735-6757(96)90051-0.
6
EMS Providers' Beliefs Regarding Spinal Precautions for Pediatric Trauma Transport.
Prehosp Emerg Care. 2017 May-Jun;21(3):344-353. doi: 10.1080/10903127.2016.1254696. Epub 2016 Dec 5.
7
Emergency Medical Services Utilization in EMS Priority Conditions in Beirut, Lebanon.
Prehosp Disaster Med. 2016 Dec;31(6):621-627. doi: 10.1017/S1049023X16000972. Epub 2016 Sep 19.
8
The effect of trauma backboards on computed tomography radiation dose.
Clin Radiol. 2016 May;71(5):499.e1-8. doi: 10.1016/j.crad.2016.01.006. Epub 2016 Feb 28.
9
Spinal Backboard-Necessity or Hazard? The IDF Clinical Practice Guidelines and Policy.
Mil Med. 2023 Jul 22;188(7-8):e1781-e1787. doi: 10.1093/milmed/usac279.
10
Emergency Resuscitation of Patients Enrolled in the US Diaspirin Cross-linked Hemoglobin (DCLHb) Clinical Efficacy Trial.
Prehosp Disaster Med. 2015 Feb;30(1):54-61. doi: 10.1017/S1049023X14001174. Epub 2014 Dec 15.

引用本文的文献

1
The multicenter impacts of an emergency physician lead on departmental flow and provider experiences.
CJEM. 2023 Mar;25(3):224-232. doi: 10.1007/s43678-023-00459-5. Epub 2023 Feb 15.
2
Prehospital care of spinal injuries: a historical quest for reasoning and evidence.
Eur Spine J. 2018 Dec;27(12):2999-3006. doi: 10.1007/s00586-018-5762-2. Epub 2018 Sep 15.

本文引用的文献

1
Evaluation of the safety of C-spine clearance by paramedics: design and methodology.
BMC Emerg Med. 2011 Feb 1;11:1. doi: 10.1186/1471-227X-11-1.
3
Spine immobilization in penetrating trauma: more harm than good?
J Trauma. 2010 Jan;68(1):115-20; discussion 120-1. doi: 10.1097/TA.0b013e3181c9ee58.
4
Changes in physical examination caused by use of spinal immobilization.
Prehosp Emerg Care. 2002 Oct-Dec;6(4):421-4. doi: 10.1080/10903120290938067.
5
The effects of rigid collar placement on intracranial and cerebral perfusion pressures.
Anaesthesia. 2001 Jun;56(6):511-3. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2044.2001.02053.x.
7
The use of the spinal board after the pre-hospital phase of trauma management.
Emerg Med J. 2001 Jan;18(1):51-4. doi: 10.1136/emj.18.1.51.
8
Duration of patient immobilization in the ED.
Am J Emerg Med. 2000 Jan;18(1):28-30. doi: 10.1016/s0735-6757(00)90043-3.
10
The effects of neutral positioning with and without padding on spinal immobilization of healthy subjects.
Prehosp Emerg Care. 1998 Apr-Jun;2(2):112-6. doi: 10.1080/10903129808958853.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验