Department of Psychology, University of Illinois, Champaign, IL 61820, USA.
Behav Brain Sci. 2013 Aug;36(4):376-7. doi: 10.1017/S0140525X12002713. Epub 2013 Jun 24.
We agree with Pickering & Garrod's (P&G's) claim that theories of language processing must address the interconnection of language production and comprehension. However, we have two concerns: First, the central notion of context when predicting what another person will say is underspecified. Second, it is not clear that P&G's dual-mechanism model captures the data better than a single-mechanism model would.
我们同意 Pickering 和 Garrod（简称 P&G）的观点，即语言处理理论必须解决语言产生和理解的相互联系。然而，我们有两点担忧：第一，预测他人说话内容时所使用的“语境”这一核心概念没有得到明确说明。第二，目前尚不清楚 P&G 的双重机制模型是否比单一机制模型更能很好地捕捉数据。
