• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

与颈动脉支架置入术相关的栓塞发生率:开孔型支架与闭孔型支架。

Incidence of embolism associated with carotid artery stenting: open-cell versus closed-cell stents.

机构信息

Department of Radiology, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea.

出版信息

J Neurosurg. 2013 Sep;119(3):642-7. doi: 10.3171/2013.5.JNS1331. Epub 2013 Jun 21.

DOI:10.3171/2013.5.JNS1331
PMID:23790113
Abstract

OBJECT

Carotid artery stenting (CAS) can be an alternative option for carotid endarterectomy in the prevention of ischemic stroke caused by carotid artery stenosis. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the influence of stent design on the incidence of procedural and postprocedural embolism associated with CAS treatment.

METHODS

Ninety-six symptomatic and asymptomatic patients, consisting of 79 males and 17 females, with moderate to severe carotid artery stenosis and a mean age of 69.0 years were treated with CAS. The stent type (48 closed-cell and 48 open-cell stents) was randomly allocated before the procedure. Imaging, procedural, and clinical outcomes were assessed and compared. The symptomatic subgroup (76 patients) was also analyzed to determine the influence of stent design on outcome.

RESULTS

New lesions on postprocedural diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) were significantly more frequent in the open-cell than in the closed-cell stent group (24 vs 12, respectively; p = 0.020). The 30-day clinical outcome was not different between the 2 stent groups. In the symptomatic patient group, stent design (p = 0.017, OR 4.173) and recent smoking history (p = 0.036, OR 4.755) were strong risk factors for new lesions on postprocedural DWI.

CONCLUSIONS

Stent design may have an influence on the risk of new embolism, and selecting the appropriate stent may improve outcome.

摘要

目的

颈动脉支架置入术(CAS)可作为颈动脉内膜切除术的替代方案,用于预防颈动脉狭窄引起的缺血性卒中。本研究旨在评估支架设计对 CAS 治疗相关术中及术后栓塞事件发生率的影响。

方法

96 例症状性和无症状性颈动脉中重度狭窄患者(79 例男性,17 例女性),平均年龄 69.0 岁,接受了 CAS 治疗。在术前随机分配支架类型(48 枚密网支架和 48 枚开口支架)。评估并比较了影像学、手术过程和临床结果。还对症状性亚组(76 例患者)进行了分析,以确定支架设计对结果的影响。

结果

术后弥散加权成像(DWI)上新病灶在开口支架组明显多于密网支架组(分别为 24 例和 12 例;p=0.020)。两组 30 天临床结局无差异。在症状性患者组中,支架设计(p=0.017,OR 4.173)和近期吸烟史(p=0.036,OR 4.755)是术后 DWI 上新病灶的强烈危险因素。

结论

支架设计可能对新发栓塞的风险有影响,选择合适的支架可能改善结局。

相似文献

1
Incidence of embolism associated with carotid artery stenting: open-cell versus closed-cell stents.与颈动脉支架置入术相关的栓塞发生率:开孔型支架与闭孔型支架。
J Neurosurg. 2013 Sep;119(3):642-7. doi: 10.3171/2013.5.JNS1331. Epub 2013 Jun 21.
2
A diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging-based study of transcervical carotid stenting with flow reversal versus transfemoral filter protection.基于扩散加权磁共振成像的经颈内颈动脉支架置入术与经股动脉滤器保护的血流逆转研究。
J Vasc Surg. 2012 Dec;56(6):1585-90. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2012.05.107. Epub 2012 Sep 7.
3
Randomized clinical trial of open-cell vs closed-cell stents for carotid stenting and effects of stent design on cerebral embolization.随机临床试验:开环支架与闭环支架在颈动脉支架置入术中的应用比较,以及支架设计对脑栓塞的影响。
J Vasc Surg. 2011 Nov;54(5):1310-1316.e1; discussion 1316. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2011.05.013. Epub 2011 Jul 1.
4
A meta-analysis of the effect of stent design on clinical and radiologic outcomes of carotid artery stenting.支架设计对颈动脉支架置入术临床和影像学结局影响的荟萃分析。
J Vasc Surg. 2019 Jun;69(6):1952-1961.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2018.11.017.
5
Prevalence and clinical significance of stent fracture and deformation following carotid artery stenting.颈动脉支架置入术后支架断裂和变形的发生率及临床意义。
J Vasc Surg. 2011 Sep;54(3):685-90. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2011.03.257.
6
Society for Vascular Surgery Vascular Registry evaluation of stent cell design on carotid artery stenting outcomes.血管外科学会血管注册评估颈动脉支架置入术结果中支架细胞设计。
J Vasc Surg. 2011 Jul;54(1):71-9. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2010.12.054. Epub 2011 Mar 31.
7
Safety of latest-generation self-expanding stents in patients with NASCET-ineligible severe symptomatic extracranial internal carotid artery stenosis.新一代自膨式支架在不符合北美症状性颈动脉内膜切除术(NASCET)标准的重度症状性颅外颈内动脉狭窄患者中的安全性
Arch Neurol. 2004 Jan;61(1):39-43. doi: 10.1001/archneur.61.1.39.
8
Carotid artery stenting according to the tailored-CAS algorithm is associated with a low complication rate at 30 days: data from the TARGET-CAS study.根据定制化颈动脉支架术(CAS)算法行颈动脉支架置入术与 30 天内低并发症发生率相关:TARGET-CAS 研究的数据。
Kardiol Pol. 2012;70(4):378-86.
9
Comparing the embolic potential of open and closed cell stents during carotid angioplasty and stenting.比较颈动脉血管成形术和支架置入术中开放细胞支架和封闭细胞支架的栓塞潜能。
J Vasc Surg. 2012 Jul;56(1):89-95. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2011.12.077. Epub 2012 Mar 2.
10
Cerebral embolization in asymptomatic versus symptomatic patients after carotid stenting.无症状与有症状颈动脉支架置入术后患者的脑栓塞。
J Vasc Surg. 2012 Dec;56(6):1579-84; discussion 1584. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2012.06.074. Epub 2012 Oct 3.

引用本文的文献

1
Mobile Atheroma in the Left Internal Carotid Artery: A Case of Impending Doom!左颈内动脉活动粥样斑块:一例危在旦夕的病例!
Cureus. 2023 Dec 27;15(12):e51181. doi: 10.7759/cureus.51181. eCollection 2023 Dec.
2
Mid-Term Results of an Italian Multicentric Experience with the Roadsaver Dual-Layer Carotid Stent System.意大利多中心使用Roadsaver双层颈动脉支架系统的中期结果
Healthcare (Basel). 2024 Jan 4;12(1):120. doi: 10.3390/healthcare12010120.
3
Evaluation of the association between silent ischemic lesions and stent design in carotid stenting applications.
评估无症状性缺血性病灶与颈动脉支架置入术应用中支架设计之间的关联。
Rev Assoc Med Bras (1992). 2023 May 19;69(5):e20221437. doi: 10.1590/1806-9282.20221437. eCollection 2023.
4
Should we change our carotid stenting technique? Does balloon postdilatation increase periprocedural cranial embolism? A diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging study.我们应该改变颈动脉支架置入技术吗?球囊后扩张会增加围手术期颅内栓塞吗?一项弥散加权磁共振成像研究。
Postepy Kardiol Interwencyjnej. 2022 Mar;18(1):58-64. doi: 10.5114/aic.2022.115303. Epub 2022 Apr 11.
5
Asymptomatic Cerebral Emboli Following Carotid Artery Stenting: A Diffusion-Weighted MRI Study.颈动脉支架置入术后无症状性脑栓塞:一项弥散加权 MRI 研究。
Anatol J Cardiol. 2022 Apr;26(4):298-304. doi: 10.5152/AnatolJCardiol.2021.970.
6
Treatment of carotid stenosis: surgery and stent in comparison.颈动脉狭窄的治疗:手术与支架置入的比较
Eur Heart J Suppl. 2021 Oct 8;23(Suppl E):E91-E94. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/suab099. eCollection 2021 Oct.
7
Carotid artery stenting versus endarterectomy for treatment of carotid artery stenosis.颈动脉支架置入术与颈动脉内膜切除术治疗颈动脉狭窄的比较。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2020 Feb 25;2(2):CD000515. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD000515.pub5.
8
Secular Trends in Procedural Stroke or Death Risks of Stenting Versus Endarterectomy for Symptomatic Carotid Stenosis.症状性颈动脉狭窄支架置入术与内膜切除术的操作相关卒中或死亡风险的长期变化趋势。
Circ Cardiovasc Interv. 2019 Aug;12(8):e007870. doi: 10.1161/CIRCINTERVENTIONS.119.007870. Epub 2019 Aug 5.
9
Silent brain infarcts on diffusion-weighted imaging after carotid revascularisation: A surrogate outcome measure for procedural stroke? A systematic review and meta-analysis.颈动脉血运重建术后扩散加权成像上的无症状脑梗死:程序性卒中的替代结局指标?一项系统评价和荟萃分析。
Eur Stroke J. 2019 Jun;4(2):127-143. doi: 10.1177/2396987318824491. Epub 2019 Jan 15.
10
Real-world Experience of Carotid Artery Stenting in Japan: Analysis of 8458 Cases from the JR-NET3 Nationwide Retrospective Multi-center Registries.日本颈动脉支架置入术的真实世界经验:来自JR-NET3全国性回顾性多中心注册研究的8458例病例分析。
Neurol Med Chir (Tokyo). 2019 Apr 15;59(4):117-125. doi: 10.2176/nmc.st.2018-0264. Epub 2019 Mar 15.