• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

日本颈动脉支架置入术的真实世界经验:来自JR-NET3全国性回顾性多中心注册研究的8458例病例分析。

Real-world Experience of Carotid Artery Stenting in Japan: Analysis of 8458 Cases from the JR-NET3 Nationwide Retrospective Multi-center Registries.

作者信息

Tokuda Ryo, Yoshimura Shinichi, Uchida Kazutaka, Yamada Kiyofumi, Satow Tetsu, Iihara Koji, Sakai Nobuyuki

机构信息

Department of Neurosurgery, Hyogo College of Medicine.

Department of Neurosurgery, National Cerebral and Cardiovascular Center.

出版信息

Neurol Med Chir (Tokyo). 2019 Apr 15;59(4):117-125. doi: 10.2176/nmc.st.2018-0264. Epub 2019 Mar 15.

DOI:10.2176/nmc.st.2018-0264
PMID:30880307
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6465528/
Abstract

We aimed to clarify the outcomes of carotid artery stenting (CAS) in the Japanese population. For this purpose, we reviewed data from the Japanese Registry of NeuroEndovascular Therapy 3 (JR-NET3), a retrospective, nation-wide, multi-center, observational study of neuroendovascular treatments in Japan. Of the 9207 patients who underwent CAS between January 2010 and December 2014, 8458 satisfied the inclusion criteria for our analysis. The outcome statistics of this JR-NET3 cohort were compared to those of JR-NET1 and 2 cohorts fitting the same inclusion criteria. Of the 8458 JR-NET3 patients analyzed, 8042 (95.1%) were treated by surgeons with board certification from the Japanese Society for NeuroEndovascular Therapy. Technical success was achieved in 8417 patients (99.5%), whereas 198 patients (2.3%) had clinically significant complications (CSCs). These findings mirrored those obtained for the JR-NET1 and 2 cohorts. On multivariate analysis, risk factors for CAS-associated CSC included symptomatic lesion [odds ratio (OR), 1.91; 95% confidence interval (CI), 1.23-3.00; P = 0.003] and hypoechoic lesion on carotid artery ultrasound (OR, 1.85; 95% CI, 1.21-2.84; P = 0.005), whereas use of closed-cell stents was a predictor of better outcome (OR, 0.53; 95% CI, 0.35-0.79; P = 0.002). The findings of JR-NET3 reflect good outcomes of CAS, but non-modifiable risk factors reflecting lesion characteristics remain of concern. Using closed-cell stents is advisable. Technological advances such as the introduction of new materials may help further improve CAS outcomes in Japanese patients.

摘要

我们旨在阐明日本人群中颈动脉支架置入术(CAS)的治疗结果。为此,我们回顾了来自日本神经血管内治疗注册研究3(JR-NET3)的数据,这是一项在日本进行的回顾性、全国性、多中心的神经血管内治疗观察性研究。在2010年1月至2014年12月期间接受CAS治疗的9207例患者中,8458例符合我们分析的纳入标准。将JR-NET3队列的结果统计数据与符合相同纳入标准的JR-NET1和2队列的结果进行比较。在分析的8458例JR-NET3患者中,8042例(95.1%)由获得日本神经血管内治疗学会认证的外科医生进行治疗。8417例患者(99.5%)技术成功,而198例患者(2.3%)出现临床显著并发症(CSC)。这些结果与JR-NET1和2队列的结果相似。多因素分析显示,与CAS相关的CSC的危险因素包括症状性病变[比值比(OR),1.91;95%置信区间(CI),1.23 - 3.00;P = 0.003]和颈动脉超声低回声病变(OR,1.85;95%CI,1.21 - 2.84;P = 0.005),而使用闭孔支架是预后较好的预测因素(OR,0.53;95%CI,0.35 - 0.79;P = 0.002)。JR-NET3的研究结果反映了CAS的良好疗效,但反映病变特征的不可改变的危险因素仍值得关注。建议使用闭孔支架。新材料的引入等技术进步可能有助于进一步改善日本患者的CAS治疗效果。

相似文献

1
Real-world Experience of Carotid Artery Stenting in Japan: Analysis of 8458 Cases from the JR-NET3 Nationwide Retrospective Multi-center Registries.日本颈动脉支架置入术的真实世界经验:来自JR-NET3全国性回顾性多中心注册研究的8458例病例分析。
Neurol Med Chir (Tokyo). 2019 Apr 15;59(4):117-125. doi: 10.2176/nmc.st.2018-0264. Epub 2019 Mar 15.
2
Real-world experience of carotid artery stenting in Japan: analysis of 7,134 cases from JR-NET1 and 2 nationwide retrospective multi-center registries.日本颈动脉支架置入术的真实世界经验:来自JR-NET1和2全国性回顾性多中心登记处的7134例病例分析。
Neurol Med Chir (Tokyo). 2014;54(1):32-9. doi: 10.2176/nmc.oa2013-0187. Epub 2013 Dec 5.
3
Real-world Experience of Carotid Artery Stentingin Japan: Analysis of 7,134 Cases from JR-NET1 and 2Nationwide Retrospective Multi-center Registries.日本颈动脉支架置入术的真实世界经验:对来自JR-NET1和2全国性回顾性多中心注册研究的7134例病例的分析。
Neurol Med Chir (Tokyo). 2014;54 Suppl 2:32-9.
4
The Current Status of Endovascular Treatment for Extracranial Steno-occlusive Diseases in Japan: Analysis Using the Japanese Registry of Neuroendovascular Therapy 3 (JR-NET3).日本颅外狭窄闭塞性疾病血管内治疗的现状:使用日本神经血管内治疗注册研究3(JR-NET3)进行的分析
Neurol Med Chir (Tokyo). 2020 Jan 15;60(1):1-9. doi: 10.2176/nmc.st.2018-0315. Epub 2019 Nov 21.
5
Real-World Outcomes of Carotid Artery Stenting in Symptomatic and Asymptomatic Patients With Carotid Artery Stenosis.有症状和无症状颈动脉狭窄患者颈动脉支架置入术的真实世界结局。
JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2024 May 13;17(9):1148-1159. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2024.03.014.
6
Current perioperative management of anticoagulant and antiplatelet use in neuroendovascular therapy: analysis of JR-NET1 and 2.神经血管内治疗中抗凝和抗血小板药物使用的当前围手术期管理:JR-NET1和2分析
Neurol Med Chir (Tokyo). 2014;54 Suppl 2:9-16.
7
A comparison of the prevalence and risk factors of complications in intracranial tumor embolization between the Japanese Registry of NeuroEndovascular Therapy 2 (JR-NET2) and JR-NET3.颅内肿瘤栓塞治疗中日本神经血管治疗登记研究 2 期(JR-NET2)和 3 期的并发症发生率和危险因素比较。
Acta Neurochir (Wien). 2019 Aug;161(8):1675-1682. doi: 10.1007/s00701-019-03970-w. Epub 2019 Jun 7.
8
Treatment Outcome of Intracranial Tumor Embolization in Japan: Japanese Registry of NeuroEndovascular Therapy 3 (JR-NET3).日本颅内肿瘤栓塞治疗的结果:日本神经血管内治疗登记处3(JR-NET3)。
Neurol Med Chir (Tokyo). 2019 Feb 15;59(2):41-47. doi: 10.2176/nmc.st.2018-0220. Epub 2019 Jan 26.
9
Long-Term Outcomes of Carotid Endarterectomy and Carotid Artery Stenting When Performed by a Single Vascular Surgeon.由单一血管外科医生实施颈动脉内膜切除术和颈动脉支架置入术的长期结果。
Vasc Endovascular Surg. 2019 Apr;53(3):216-223. doi: 10.1177/1538574418823379. Epub 2019 Jan 6.
10
Carotid artery stenting is associated with a higher incidence of major adverse clinical events than carotid endarterectomy in female patients.在女性患者中,与颈动脉内膜切除术相比,颈动脉支架置入术与主要不良临床事件的发生率更高相关。
J Vasc Surg. 2017 Sep;66(3):794-801. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2017.03.413. Epub 2017 May 11.

引用本文的文献

1
Antithrombotic Therapy in Carotid Artery and Intracranial Artery Stent.颈动脉和颅内动脉支架置入术中的抗栓治疗
J Neuroendovasc Ther. 2025;19(1). doi: 10.5797/jnet.ra.2024-0014. Epub 2024 Apr 16.
2
Clinical Outcomes of Carotid Artery Stenting for Carotid Artery Stenosis in Maintenance Hemodialysis Patients.维持性血液透析患者颈动脉狭窄行颈动脉支架置入术的临床结局
Neurol Med Chir (Tokyo). 2025 Jan 15;65(1):37-44. doi: 10.2176/jns-nmc.2024-0193. Epub 2024 Nov 25.
3
Safety and Risk Factors of Carotid Artery Stenting with Simple Distal Filter Protection: A Single-Center Retrospective Study.单纯远端滤网保护下颈动脉支架置入术的安全性和危险因素:一项单中心回顾性研究
J Neuroendovasc Ther. 2024;18(6):155-163. doi: 10.5797/jnet.oa.2023-0096. Epub 2024 Apr 8.
4
Short term outcomes of carotid surgery: the real-world experience of a single teaching center.颈动脉手术的短期疗效:单一教学中心的真实世界经验。
J Vasc Bras. 2024 Feb 5;23:e20230033. doi: 10.1590/1677-5449.202300332. eCollection 2024.
5
Transradial artery access for carotid artery stenting: A pooled analysis.经桡动脉入路行颈动脉支架置入术:汇总分析。
Neuroradiol J. 2024 Oct;37(5):546-555. doi: 10.1177/19714009231224410. Epub 2024 Jan 3.
6
Periprocedural Variability of Platelet Functions in Carotid Artery Stenting: An Analysis Using VerifyNow.颈动脉支架置入术中血小板功能的围手术期变异性:使用VerifyNow的分析
J Neuroendovasc Ther. 2021;15(8):505-516. doi: 10.5797/jnet.oa.2020-0170. Epub 2021 Jan 6.
7
Antiplatelet Loading Effects Prior to Endovascular Treatment: Carotid Artery Stenosis versus Unruptured Cerebral Aneurysms.血管内治疗前的抗血小板负荷效应:颈动脉狭窄与未破裂脑动脉瘤
J Neuroendovasc Ther. 2021;15(6):347-351. doi: 10.5797/jnet.oa.2019-0125. Epub 2021 Jan 15.
8
Strategy of carotid artery stenting as first-line treatment and carotid endarterectomy for carotid artery stenosis: A single-center experience.颈动脉支架置入术作为一线治疗策略及颈动脉内膜切除术治疗颈动脉狭窄:单中心经验
Surg Neurol Int. 2022 Nov 4;13:513. doi: 10.25259/SNI_820_2022. eCollection 2022.
9
Trans-cell Approach through Closed-cell Stent for Middle Meningeal Artery Embolization in Recurrent Chronic Subdural Hematoma.经闭合细胞支架的跨细胞方法用于复发性慢性硬膜下血肿的脑膜中动脉栓塞术
NMC Case Rep J. 2021 Dec 22;8(1):847-850. doi: 10.2176/nmccrj.cr.2021-0307. eCollection 2021.
10
Transradial approach for neurointerventions: a systematic review of the literature.经桡动脉入路神经介入治疗:文献系统评价。
J Neurointerv Surg. 2020 Sep;12(9):886-892. doi: 10.1136/neurintsurg-2019-015764. Epub 2020 Mar 9.

本文引用的文献

1
Risk of Stroke or Death Is Associated With the Timing of Carotid Artery Stenting for Symptomatic Carotid Stenosis: A Secondary Data Analysis of the German Statutory Quality Assurance Database.症状性颈动脉狭窄行颈动脉支架置入术的时间与卒中或死亡风险相关:德国法定质量保证数据库的二次数据分析。
J Am Heart Assoc. 2018 Mar 27;7(7):e007983. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.117.007983.
2
Carotid Endarterectomy and Carotid Artery Stenting in the US Medicare Population, 1999-2014.1999 - 2014年美国医疗保险人群中的颈动脉内膜切除术和颈动脉支架置入术
JAMA. 2017 Sep 19;318(11):1035-1046. doi: 10.1001/jama.2017.12882.
3
Early Endarterectomy Carries a Lower Procedural Risk Than Early Stenting in Patients With Symptomatic Stenosis of the Internal Carotid Artery: Results From 4 Randomized Controlled Trials.对于有症状的颈内动脉狭窄患者,早期动脉内膜切除术的手术风险低于早期支架置入术:4项随机对照试验的结果
Stroke. 2017 Jun;48(6):1580-1587. doi: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.116.016233. Epub 2017 Apr 28.
4
Randomized Trial of Stent versus Surgery for Asymptomatic Carotid Stenosis.无症状性颈动脉狭窄支架治疗与手术治疗随机试验
N Engl J Med. 2016 Mar 17;374(11):1011-20. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1515706. Epub 2016 Feb 17.
5
Real-world experience of carotid artery stenting in Japan: analysis of 7,134 cases from JR-NET1 and 2 nationwide retrospective multi-center registries.日本颈动脉支架置入术的真实世界经验:来自JR-NET1和2全国性回顾性多中心登记处的7134例病例分析。
Neurol Med Chir (Tokyo). 2014;54(1):32-9. doi: 10.2176/nmc.oa2013-0187. Epub 2013 Dec 5.
6
Incidence of embolism associated with carotid artery stenting: open-cell versus closed-cell stents.与颈动脉支架置入术相关的栓塞发生率:开孔型支架与闭孔型支架。
J Neurosurg. 2013 Sep;119(3):642-7. doi: 10.3171/2013.5.JNS1331. Epub 2013 Jun 21.
7
The risk of carotid artery stenting compared with carotid endarterectomy is greatest in patients treated within 7 days of symptoms.与颈动脉内膜切除术相比,在症状出现后 7 天内接受治疗的患者进行颈动脉支架置入术的风险最大。
J Vasc Surg. 2013 Mar;57(3):619-626.e2; discussion 625-6. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2012.08.107. Epub 2012 Dec 11.
8
A meta-analysis of proximal occlusion device outcomes in carotid artery stenting.颈动脉支架置入术中近端闭塞装置结局的荟萃分析。
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2012 Dec 1;80(7):1072-8. doi: 10.1002/ccd.24433. Epub 2012 Jul 23.
9
The PROFI study (Prevention of Cerebral Embolization by Proximal Balloon Occlusion Compared to Filter Protection During Carotid Artery Stenting): a prospective randomized trial.PROFI 研究(颈动脉支架置入术中近端球囊闭塞与滤器保护预防脑栓塞的前瞻性随机试验)。
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2012 Apr 10;59(15):1383-9. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2011.11.035. Epub 2012 Jan 25.
10
Microembolization during carotid artery stenting in patients with high-risk, lipid-rich plaque. A randomized trial of proximal versus distal cerebral protection.颈动脉支架置入术中高危、富含脂质斑块患者的微栓塞。近端与远端脑保护的随机试验。
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2011 Oct 11;58(16):1656-63. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2011.07.015.