• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

西妥昔单抗联合化疗作为转移性结直肠癌一线治疗:KRAS 突变对台湾患者治疗效果的影响。

Cetuximab plus chemotherapy as first-line treatment for metastatic colorectal cancer: effect of KRAS mutation on treatment efficacy in Taiwanese patients.

机构信息

Taichung Veterans General Hospital, Taichung, Taiwan.

出版信息

Neoplasma. 2013;60(5):561-7. doi: 10.4149/neo_2013_073.

DOI:10.4149/neo_2013_073
PMID:23790176
Abstract

Cetuximab, either alone or in combination with chemotherapy, is approved for treatment of patients with metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC). We reviewed retrospectively records of 50 patients with mCRC from a single center in Taiwan. All patients had ECOG performance status grade 2, histological diagnosis of advanced CRC based on RECIST criteria, and were given at least three cycles of chemotherapy plus cetuximab. We compared the effectiveness of therapy in patients with wild-type and mutant KRAS genes, assessed the overall response (OR) rate of patients with locally advanced or metastatic non-resectable CRC, and assessed the progression-free survival (PFS) time. The ten patients with KRAS mutations had poorer response rates than the 40 patients with the wild-type KRAS gene. Patients with the wild-type and mutant genes had similar progression free survival (PFS) status and median time to PFS. The median overall survival time was significantly greater in patients with the wild-type gene than in those with the mutant gene (28.77 ± 6.43 months vs. 15.13 ± 0.50 months, p=0.014). Taiwanese patients with mCRC respond better to a cetuximab plus chemotherapy regime if their tumors have the wild-type KRAS gene.

摘要

西妥昔单抗,无论是单独使用还是与化疗联合使用,均被批准用于转移性结直肠癌(mCRC)患者的治疗。我们回顾性分析了来自台湾某单一中心的 50 例 mCRC 患者的记录。所有患者 ECOG 体能状态评分为 2 分,组织学诊断为基于 RECIST 标准的晚期 CRC,并且至少接受了三个周期的化疗加西妥昔单抗治疗。我们比较了 KRAS 基因野生型和突变型患者的治疗效果,评估了局部晚期或转移性不可切除 CRC 患者的总体缓解(OR)率,并评估了无进展生存期(PFS)。10 例 KRAS 突变患者的缓解率低于 40 例 KRAS 野生型基因患者。野生型和突变型基因患者的无进展生存(PFS)状况和中位 PFS 时间相似。野生型基因患者的中位总生存期明显长于突变型基因患者(28.77 ± 6.43 个月 vs. 15.13 ± 0.50 个月,p=0.014)。台湾 mCRC 患者如果肿瘤具有 KRAS 野生型基因,对西妥昔单抗联合化疗方案的反应更好。

相似文献

1
Cetuximab plus chemotherapy as first-line treatment for metastatic colorectal cancer: effect of KRAS mutation on treatment efficacy in Taiwanese patients.西妥昔单抗联合化疗作为转移性结直肠癌一线治疗:KRAS 突变对台湾患者治疗效果的影响。
Neoplasma. 2013;60(5):561-7. doi: 10.4149/neo_2013_073.
2
Association of KRAS G13D tumor mutations with outcome in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer treated with first-line chemotherapy with or without cetuximab.KRAS G13D 肿瘤突变与接受一线化疗联合或不联合西妥昔单抗治疗的转移性结直肠癌患者结局的关联。
J Clin Oncol. 2012 Oct 10;30(29):3570-7. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2012.42.2592. Epub 2012 Jun 25.
3
Phase II trial of cetuximab plus irinotecan for oxaliplatin- and irinotecan-based chemotherapy-refractory patients with advanced and/or metastatic colorectal cancer: evaluation of efficacy and safety based on KRAS mutation status (T-CORE0801).厄洛替尼联合伊立替康治疗奥沙利铂和伊立替康化疗耐药的晚期和/或转移性结直肠癌患者的 II 期临床试验:基于 KRAS 突变状态的疗效和安全性评估(T-CORE0801)。
Oncology. 2014;87(1):7-20. doi: 10.1159/000360989. Epub 2014 Jun 24.
4
PTEN expression and KRAS mutations on primary tumors and metastases in the prediction of benefit from cetuximab plus irinotecan for patients with metastatic colorectal cancer.原发性肿瘤和转移灶中PTEN表达及KRAS突变对转移性结直肠癌患者从西妥昔单抗联合伊立替康治疗中获益的预测作用
J Clin Oncol. 2009 Jun 1;27(16):2622-9. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2008.20.2796. Epub 2009 Apr 27.
5
Activating KRAS mutations and overexpression of epidermal growth factor receptor as independent predictors in metastatic colorectal cancer patients treated with cetuximab.KRAS 基因突变激活和表皮生长因子受体过表达是西妥昔单抗治疗转移性结直肠癌患者的独立预测指标。
Ann Surg. 2010 Feb;251(2):254-60. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0b013e3181bc9d96.
6
FOLFOX4 with cetuximab vs. UFOX with cetuximab as first-line therapy in metastatic colorectal cancer: The randomized phase II FUTURE study.FOLFOX4 联合西妥昔单抗对比 UFT/LV 联合西妥昔单抗一线治疗转移性结直肠癌的随机 II 期 FUTURE 研究。
Clin Colorectal Cancer. 2014 Mar;13(1):14-26.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.clcc.2013.11.009. Epub 2013 Nov 16.
7
Dual targeting of the epidermal growth factor receptor using the combination of cetuximab and erlotinib: preclinical evaluation and results of the phase II DUX study in chemotherapy-refractory, advanced colorectal cancer.表皮生长因子受体的双重靶向治疗:西妥昔单抗联合厄洛替尼的临床前评估和二线治疗化疗耐药的晚期结直肠癌的Ⅱ期 DUX 研究结果。
J Clin Oncol. 2012 May 1;30(13):1505-12. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2011.38.6599. Epub 2012 Mar 12.
8
Cetuximab plus capecitabine and irinotecan compared with cetuximab plus capecitabine and oxaliplatin as first-line treatment for patients with metastatic colorectal cancer: AIO KRK-0104--a randomized trial of the German AIO CRC study group.西妥昔单抗联合卡培他滨和伊立替康对比西妥昔单抗联合卡培他滨和奥沙利铂作为转移性结直肠癌一线治疗:德国 AIO CRC 研究组的 AIO KRK-0104 随机试验。
J Clin Oncol. 2011 Mar 10;29(8):1050-8. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2010.31.1936. Epub 2011 Feb 7.
9
Fluorouracil, leucovorin, and irinotecan plus cetuximab treatment and RAS mutations in colorectal cancer.氟尿嘧啶、亚叶酸钙和伊立替康联合西妥昔单抗治疗与结直肠癌的 RAS 突变。
J Clin Oncol. 2015 Mar 1;33(7):692-700. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2014.59.4812. Epub 2015 Jan 20.
10
Phase III trial of cetuximab with continuous or intermittent fluorouracil, leucovorin, and oxaliplatin (Nordic FLOX) versus FLOX alone in first-line treatment of metastatic colorectal cancer: the NORDIC-VII study.在转移性结直肠癌一线治疗中,西妥昔单抗联合连续或间断氟尿嘧啶、亚叶酸钙和奥沙利铂(北欧 FLOX)与 FLOX 单药治疗的 III 期临床试验:NORDIC-VII 研究。
J Clin Oncol. 2012 May 20;30(15):1755-62. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2011.38.0915. Epub 2012 Apr 2.

引用本文的文献

1
The impact of combining cetuximab with the traditional chemotherapy regimens on clinical effectiveness in metastatic colorectal cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis.西妥昔单抗联合传统化疗方案对转移性结直肠癌临床疗效的影响:一项系统评价和荟萃分析。
BMC Cancer. 2025 Feb 24;25(1):331. doi: 10.1186/s12885-025-13515-3.
2
Understanding the Role of Connexins in Hepatocellular Carcinoma: Molecular and Prognostic Implications.了解连接蛋白在肝细胞癌中的作用:分子及预后意义
Cancers (Basel). 2024 Apr 17;16(8):1533. doi: 10.3390/cancers16081533.
3
A Long-Term and Large-Scale Real-World Study in Taiwan: Efficacy of Target Therapy in Stage IV Colorectal Cancer.
台湾一项长期大规模真实世界研究:靶向治疗在IV期结直肠癌中的疗效
Front Oncol. 2022 Mar 17;12:808808. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2022.808808. eCollection 2022.
4
Is there an efficacy-effectiveness gap between randomized controlled trials and real-world studies in colorectal cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis.在结直肠癌中,随机对照试验与真实世界研究之间是否存在疗效-效果差距:一项系统评价和荟萃分析。
Transl Cancer Res. 2020 Nov;9(11):6963-6987. doi: 10.21037/tcr-20-2303.
5
Standard chemotherapy with cetuximab for treatment of colorectal cancer.使用西妥昔单抗的标准化疗用于治疗结直肠癌。
World J Gastroenterol. 2015 Jun 14;21(22):7022-35. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v21.i22.7022.
6
S-1 monotherapy as second line chemotherapy in advanced gastric cancer patients previously treated with cisplatin/infusional fluorouracil.S-1单药作为晚期胃癌患者二线化疗,这些患者先前接受过顺铂/氟尿嘧啶持续静脉滴注治疗。
Int J Clin Exp Pathol. 2014 Jun 15;7(7):4274-9. eCollection 2014.
7
S-1 monotherapy as second line chemotherapy in advanced gastric cancer patients previously treated with cisplatin/infusional fluorouracil.S-1单药作为晚期胃癌患者二线化疗,这些患者先前接受过顺铂/持续输注氟尿嘧啶治疗。
Int J Clin Exp Pathol. 2014 May 15;7(6):3293-8. eCollection 2014.