Department of Oncology, Oslo University Hospital, 0407 Oslo, Norway.
J Clin Oncol. 2012 May 20;30(15):1755-62. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2011.38.0915. Epub 2012 Apr 2.
The NORDIC-VII multicenter phase III trial investigated the efficacy of cetuximab when added to bolus fluorouracil/folinic acid and oxaliplatin (Nordic FLOX), administered continuously or intermittently, in previously untreated metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC). The influence of KRAS mutation status on treatment outcome was also investigated.
Patients were randomly assigned to receive either standard Nordic FLOX (arm A), cetuximab and FLOX (arm B), or cetuximab combined with intermittent FLOX (arm C). Primary end point was progression-free survival (PFS). Overall survival (OS), response rate, R0 resection rate, and safety were secondary end points.
Of the 571 patients randomly assigned, 566 were evaluable in intention-to-treat (ITT) analyses. KRAS and BRAF mutation analyses were obtained in 498 (88%) and 457 patients (81%), respectively. KRAS mutations were present in 39% of the tumors; 12% of tumors had BRAF mutations. The presence of BRAF mutations was a strong negative prognostic factor. In the ITT population, median PFS was 7.9, 8.3, and 7.3 months for the three arms, respectively (not significantly different). OS was almost identical for the three groups (20.4, 19.7, 20.3 months, respectively), and confirmed response rates were 41%, 49%, and 47%, respectively. In patients with KRAS wild-type tumors, cetuximab did not provide any additional benefit compared with FLOX alone. In patients with KRAS mutations, no significant difference was detected, although a trend toward improved PFS was observed in arm B. The regimens were well tolerated.
Cetuximab did not add significant benefit to the Nordic FLOX regimen in first-line treatment of mCRC.
NORDIC-VII 多中心 III 期试验研究了西妥昔单抗联合氟尿嘧啶/亚叶酸钙(FOLFOX)和奥沙利铂(Nordic FLOX)在未经治疗的转移性结直肠癌(mCRC)患者中的疗效,FOLFOX 方案分别以连续或间断方式给药。同时还研究了 KRAS 突变状态对治疗结果的影响。
患者被随机分配接受标准 Nordic FLOX(A 组)、西妥昔单抗联合 FLOX(B 组)或西妥昔单抗联合间断 FLOX(C 组)治疗。主要终点是无进展生存期(PFS)。次要终点包括总生存期(OS)、缓解率、R0 切除率和安全性。
571 例随机分配的患者中,566 例在意向治疗(ITT)分析中可评估。498 例(88%)和 457 例(81%)患者分别进行了 KRAS 和 BRAF 突变分析。肿瘤中存在 KRAS 突变的比例为 39%;12%的肿瘤存在 BRAF 突变。BRAF 突变的存在是一个强烈的预后不良因素。在 ITT 人群中,三组的中位 PFS 分别为 7.9、8.3 和 7.3 个月(无显著差异)。三组的 OS 几乎相同(分别为 20.4、19.7 和 20.3 个月),确认缓解率分别为 41%、49%和 47%。在 KRAS 野生型肿瘤患者中,西妥昔单抗与单独使用 FLOX 相比并未带来额外的获益。在 KRAS 突变患者中,未观察到差异,但 B 组 PFS 有改善趋势。这些方案均具有良好的耐受性。
在一线治疗 mCRC 中,西妥昔单抗并未为 Nordic FLOX 方案带来显著获益。